January 31, 2019: Submission. February 2, 2019: Technical Modification. February 13, 2019: Submit to the journal. February 14, 2019: With editor. February 17, 2019: Under review. March 7, 2019: Under review (status data). March 28, 2019: Under editor's evaluation. March 29, 2019: Decision in process. March 30, 2019: Major revision (30-day period). April 27, 2019: Resubmission to the journal. April 27, 2019: With editor. May 3, 2019: Under review. May 8, 2019: Required reviews. May 13, 2019: Decision in process. May 13, 2019: Accept. The quality of the revised article has been greatly improved. I finally waited for the results today, and I have more confidence in my future scientific research, and the pressure of doctoral graduation is much less than before. Thanks to Stefano Passerini, the editor-in-chief, and the reviewers, and thanks to my girlfriend for her continuous care and love.

(30) Thank | Louis_liu

February 25, 2019, submitted to journal. February 28, 2019, with editor. March 1, 2019, under review. March 9, 2019, under editor evaluation. March 12, 2019, reject but suggest resubmit. Two reviewers, the first reviewer suggested major revision, but the second one rejected the manuscript incomprehensibly. April 11, 2019, resubmitted. April 13, 2019, with editor. April 16, 2019, under review. April 19, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 22, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 24, 2019, under editor evaluation. April 24, minor revise. There were four reviewers, the first reviewer suggested direct acceptance, and the other three reviewers suggested minor revision. On May 4, revision submitted. On May 6, with editor. On May 07, under review. On May 07, required reviews completed. On May 08, accept.

(3) Thank | daiviee

The editor and reviewers are very friendly. It is my first accepted paper. I am graceful. It took 4 months from submission to acceptance. With editor lasted one month. I guessed he was looking for the reviewers. It took one month for making the decisions for the first review. I was given one month to make major revision and supplement the experiments. I revised it for one month. It was reviewed for another month after submission, and then accepted. The following is the whole process, for your information. I submitted on September 30, 2018. The result returned on October 2, 2018, technical revision; I revised and resubmitted it on the same day. It was with editor on November 3, 2018, under review on November 6, 2018, and under editor evaluation on November 26, 2018. The result of first review came out on December 4, 2018, major revision, it was just one month. Revision submitted to the journal on December 29, 2018. It was sent back on December 31, 2018, and the editor asked to revise the highlights. Revision submitted to journal on December 31, 2018. It was under review on January 2, 2019. Required reviews completed on January 30, 2019. The decision of acceptance was made on February 2, 2019.

(148) Thank | SCUTWG

The cycle difference is really big. Our laboratory has submitted papers for the journal three times. One paper was accepted but two were rejected. I was told by other researchers that their review comments were returned very quickly, and there would be opinions in a month or so; however, the response was very slow in my experience. Indeed, as everyone said, the reviewers raised the issue of language. They recommended that I  find a native speaker. JPS is very fond of dyeing sensitized solar cells and quantum dot sensitized solar cells.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Please pay attention to organizing the format of the article, including line numbers, image pixels, drawing data, etc.
In the field of electrochemistry, it feels like it has been well received after the impact factor has been lowered. I should aim for a higher-level journal next time.
Submitted on 4.25
First round of review feedback on 5.7
Revised submission on 5.17
Second round of review on 6.2
Accepted on 6.14

(0) Thank | 方方

Formal acceptance on 6.16, estimated proof this week.

(0) Thank | 电池工人小闫

6.12 agreed to accept with minor formatting revisions, 6.13 submitted revised draft

(0) Thank | 电池工人小闫

2.25 submission
2.28 formatting review requires title format change
3.7 UR 11-5
3.13 RRC
3.24 Three minor revisions result in rejection
4.29 Revision
6.3 RRC Reviewers have all submitted, still no news

(0) Thank | 电池工人小闫

It has been a month since my manuscript was sent back for revisions and I still haven't received any updates. The reviewers have all approved it, but it seems to be stuck with the editor.

(0) Thank | 电池工人小闫

After JPS was transferred to the third district by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it felt like the editorial department had gone downhill. It's been a month and a half, and they still haven't dealt with it.

(0) Thank | 小菜博

I have been at RRC for half a month.

(0) Thank | CSH8

Hello, have you accepted it?

(0) Thank | 芜湖快接收

How long does RRC take to accept?

(0) Thank | 芜湖快接收

Dipped, hard to stretch.

(0) Thank | leleup

After changing the time once, we have not changed our status. Today we are already prepared to transition to Dip.

(0) Thank | leleup

Hello, I have also received a major revision, and the editor mentioned that a major revision usually indicates a high possibility of rejection. Have you also been told the same by the editor?

(0) Thank | 再瘦30斤

Please do not waste time on articles that use artificial intelligence methods to solve problems. Please reject them directly without sending them for review.

(0) Thank | energy-1

Throw up, the review process was really slow. After a major revision, it took a total of 5 months to be accepted.

(0) Thank | 剑九

Surprisingly slow, it takes at least a month each time to return for revisions after receiving feedback. If things don't go well, it could take over 10 months from submission to acceptance, and the editors seem not to care. This journal feels like it's going downhill...

(0) Thank | Jerry233

What's going on, bro? Is the journal particularly slow?

(0) Thank | SCIee

The journal is not being managed properly.

(0) Thank | 道克特尔刘

It has been half a month since the second review of RRC, all reviewers' comments have been received, how much longer do we have to wait??

(0) Thank | SCIee

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 

"f"

(0) Thank | SCIee

2024.12.28 submitted
2024.12.30 Technical check
2024.12.31 submit to journal
2025.01.06 Under review
2025.02.08 major revision (two reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision, 13 comments)
2025.02.28 submit to journal
2025.03.09 Under review
2025.03.27 minor revision
2025.03.28 submit to journal
2025.04.06 minor revision r3
Couldn't find comments, my advisor kept delaying and telling me to ask, couldn't get a result until the deadline and submitted directly
2025.04.18 submit to journal
2025.04.20 Accept
Wishing everyone a speedy acceptance.

(0) Thank | regaleo

Brothers with ability!

(0) Thank | SCIee