The Chinese Academy of Sciences dares to put all kinds of water journals in the first district, without impact factor and influence, and no contribution to the development of the discipline of ecology. It's not about worshiping foreign things or looking down on Chinese journals. In terms of influence and discipline development, compared with journals like American Naturalist, Ecological Monograph, British Ecological Society, and the Royal Society of the United Kingdom, which have been downgraded to the second district, are they worthy of taking off people's shoes?

(0) Thank | dijfioiojio

NB, crush ecology and MEE and other journals.

(0) Thank | 爱吃冰淇淋

It seems that it's not even close to 3, the five-year impact factor is only 2.5.

(0) Thank | senhai

The impact factor is only 3, which other first zone journal has such a low impact factor?

(0) Thank | 六一儿童杰

No matter how you look at it, it's not at the level of a first-tier city. It's ridiculous.

(0) Thank | 六一儿童杰

Top in District One.

(0) Thank | 抵押灵魂*

What's the situation now, has the editor been assigned?

(0) Thank | zlc66

The reviewer's comments were sharp and direct, leading to rejection.

(0) Thank | 科研狗狗.

May I ask how much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | guobaba

Great news! Finally fell into the third tier.

(0) Thank | forestry

A journal on ecology, unexpectedly affiliated with forestry and botany, has become a second-tier journal in the distorted classification system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This journal has become a backyard for some prominent macro-ecologists in China (whenever their projects cannot be concluded or their articles cannot be published, they submit them to this journal, where the editors ask acquaintances to review them and they get accepted and published within minutes). This year, while the impact factors of ecological journals have generally increased, the impact factor of this journal has decreased to just over 1, which is truly laughable. It is advised for non-editorial board members to be cautious when submitting articles.

(2) Thank | forestry

The top journal in the field, which has an impact factor of 10, at least went through peer review. I made some changes based on the feedback and submitted this JPE, but it was not peer-reviewed. Haha. I agree with what the 5th floor said.

(3) Thank | 杰哥

A junk journal with a self-citation rate of 100%, its impact factors are all made by itself.If you have nothing to do with the editor, or if you have a bad relationship, you are advised not to select.

(0) Thank | PLANTA

Online submission URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jpe

(0) Thank | Anonymous

journal is good, the review speed is also very fast, generally 2 months have news

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://jpe.oxfordjournals.org/

(0) Thank | Anonymous

editor Very patient questions, all kinds of questions are very carefully ~ also compareTolerance, will give you the opportunity to modify

(0) Thank | Anonymous