Research Creative   My Account   Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 436284 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ PHYS D APPL PHYS
ISSN0022-3727
E-ISSN1361-6463
h-index172
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.800.6810.916
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Q18 / 44
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q178 / 434
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q130 / 132
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q165 / 284

Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021)9.30%
期刊简介Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Official Websitehttp://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://atom.iop.org/atom/usermgmt.nsf/EGWebSubmissionWelcome?OpenForm&ISSN=0022-3727
Open AccessNo
PublisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1970
Annual Article Volume730
Gold OA文章占比
OA期刊相关信息
WOS期刊SCI分区
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-3727%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 85%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS: Write a review
Author: aa606


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-10-06 00:13:47
I submitted an article in the direction of optical inspection and received a rejection email after 4 hours. When you submit to this journal, only the following directions can be chosen, and the other directions may be directly rejected: Applied magnetism; 2. Semiconductors and photonics; 3. Low-temperature plasmas; 4. Condensed matter; 5. Applied biophysics; 6. Energy.

(5) Thank | aa606

Author: LightFloater


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-05-30 22:03:49
It took 1 month for the first review, both reviewers gave good reviews, both required minor revisions, and the editor requested a moderate revision. The revision was returned to the two reviewers for a second review, and both reviewers directly accepted it, but it also took 11 days. A total of 1.5 months should be considered relatively fast, but I feel that the editing efficiency is not as fast as when I submitted to ACS journals. The Manuscript Received status usually lasts for a week, and the Awaiting Decision takes four or five days, maybe because this is a Journal. If the editing speed is as fast as the processing speed of the ACS journals, it should be accepted in less than a month.

(7) Thank | LightFloater

Author: 你点赞东哥很喜欢,你要踩,东哥不高兴


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-02 12:16:24
After APL did not send it for review, I transferred it here. The article is all about calculation and simulation, without experimental verification; 4/12/2018 submitted to journal; 24/12/2018 major revision (due date: 21/01/2019). Two reviewers asked a few questions of medium difficulty. Reviewer 1 thought it was a general article; Reviewer 2 thought it was with good opinion, but experiment was strongly required. There would be a high probability of failure if just to find a similar reference as evidence to support if there is no way to do experiment. During the revision, they would notify me to submit the paper one week earlier. I emailed to the journal that the paper delayed to 04/02/2019. 04/02/2019 R1 submitted to journal; 19/02/2019 minor revision. The reviewer requested me to add his literature. But this version was not accepted by editor after adding. 21/02/2019 R2 submitted to journal; 21/02/2019 Accept; 28/02/2019 check and proof; 17/03/2019 published

(6) Thank | 你点赞东哥很喜欢,你要踩,东哥不高兴

Author: 907390036@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-15 15:06:57
After being rejected, the letter was changed to a paper.  After the comments were addressed, the editorial department returned to the original reviewer but they only said that the topic was not suitable for publication in the journal, that it was more suitable for journals of materials. It can be said that the journal is very responsible, and overall, I feel the process is very efficient. The initial review was 15 days, and the subsequent review was within 5 days.

(7) Thank | 907390036@qq.com

Author: Leilonghui


Subject Area: 材料科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-04-17 15:29:56
4.15 Submitted
4.17 Awaiting Referee Reports

4.15 已提交
4.17 等待评审报告
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Leilonghui

Author: fsafasf


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-04-09 23:13:54
Excuse me, when submitting a revised manuscript to this journal, is the final exported PDF only the revised manuscript with annotations? Why does the PDF I exported not include my response letter and SI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fsafasf

Author: fsafasf


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-04-09 23:12:26
Excuse me, does the PDF exported when submitting the revised manuscript to this journal only contain my modified manuscript with track changes? Why does the PDF I exported only include my modified manuscript?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fsafasf

Author: fsafasf


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-04-09 23:11:21
May I ask, when submitting a revised manuscript to this journal, will the final PDF exported only include the revised version with tracked changes? Does it not include the response letter and SI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fsafasf

Author: Leilonghui


Subject Area: 材料科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-03-27 21:35:46
3.27 Major Revision A major revision was assigned by the editor, with a deadline of one month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Leilonghui

Author: Leilonghui


Subject Area: 材料科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-03-26 18:29:59
Record the submission process:
3.6 Manuscript Received
3.11 Awaiting Referee Reports
3.24 Awaiting Decision
3.24 evening Awaiting Referee Reports
3.26 Awaiting Decision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Leilonghui

Author: 脉冲技术


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-03-26 12:13:26
Could you please tell me where to download the copyright form? I have been preliminarily accepted, but they said I don't have a copyright form.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 脉冲技术

Author: lovehny


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-03-21 23:28:57
The first review took more than 40 days, and then requested major revisions. It was returned within a month, just a few days before the deadline. However, it was sent back to the original reviewer and after another month, there was still no feedback. When checking the status, it was said that feedback would be provided within a month, but why haven't I received any feedback after more than a month? Has anyone experienced the same situation? Should I follow up with the editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lovehny

Author: 王哈哈


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-27 22:12:42
Hello classmates, the journal sent an email requesting transfer of copyright and confirmation of choosing between OA and non-OA. Is this the normal procedure? I have already made revisions and resubmitted, may I ask if you received the copyright transfer request when the paper was accepted for publication? Or am I overthinking it?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 王哈哈

Author: L3960


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-26 15:58:52
2.26 Still Awaiting Referee Reports.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | L3960

Author: 阿克琉克


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-25 17:59:01
Will it be reflected in the letter whether it is a major repair or a minor repair.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 阿克琉克

Author: 脉冲技术


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-22 13:18:23
Bro, how do you see if the reviewer suggested major revisions or minor revisions? It doesn't show whether the reviewer recommended major or minor revisions for mine.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 脉冲技术

Author: 阿克琉克


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-21 10:05:09
Submitted on December 13, 2024.
Sent for review on December 19, 2024, with 3 reviewers submitting their comments intermittently due to editorial decisions in between.
Received review comments on January 14, 2025, with 2 reviewers suggesting minor revisions and 1 suggesting major revisions, with the editor granting a month for major revisions.
Revisions submitted on February 10, 2025, with delays due to the Chinese New Year, causing a response only close to the deadline.
On February 13, 2025, the third reviewer provided additional comments for minor revisions.
Revisions submitted on February 15, 2025.
Provisionally accepted on February 20, 2025.
The entire process took a little over 2 months, which is considered relatively fast for a classic physics journal. Despite being in the third tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences journals, it is highly recognized compared to material journals and is worth investing in.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 阿克琉克

Author: L3960


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-11 16:23:24
Hello, may I ask what is your current situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | L3960

Author: L3960


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-11 16:21:00
I don't know if the opinions of the two reviewers are different, or if the second reviewer has not yet reviewed it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | L3960

Author: L3960


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-11 16:19:35
2025.1.16 Submission
2025.2.5 Status as shown in the figure
2025.2.6 Awaiting Referee Reports (as indicated in the figure out to reviewers)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | L3960

Author: LIQINGKAI


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-10 19:33:23
Submitted on November 5, 2024
Revision deadline on December 10, 2024
Revised on January 8, 2025
Minor revision on January 14, 2025
Revised on January 17, 2025
Minor revision on January 21, 2025
Revised on January 22, 2025
Provisionally accepted on January 28, 2025
Accepted on January 30, 2025
Proofreading on February 4, 2025
Official publication on February 10, 2025

From submission to initial acceptance took 84 days, with 36 days spent on my own revisions. It could have been faster if I had not procrastinated. The editor was very helpful, with the first submission resulting in one reviewer rejecting it and one accepting it, leading to major revisions. The subsequent two revisions addressed the first reviewer's concerns, with the third revision being necessary due to a small oversight on my part. The third revision could have been avoided if everything had been done correctly in the first place. Overall, if everything had gone smoothly, it could have been accepted in less than two months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | LIQINGKAI

Author: O;AIHV


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-02-10 15:24:50
I am in the same situation as you. After receiving the review comments, the editor sends them back to the reviewers. Will the reviewers, like you, also have different opinions? Did you only find out that the opinions of the two reviewers were inconsistent after receiving the review report?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | O;AIHV

Author: tt


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-01-20 14:50:15
Submit a major revision one month, requiring a response to be completed within one month, with the review to be completed within one week after response. Currently waiting for the editor's decision.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tt

Author: 123hwl


Subject Area: 材料科学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2025-01-17 09:32:53
Hello, may I ask if there will still be any revisions after receiving the copyedited version?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 123hwl

Author: 急毕业


Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2024-12-20 10:48:42
How long will it take to hear back after resubmitting a rejected manuscript? I received feedback for revisions, resubmitted it after 40 days, will there be any updates before the end of the year?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 急毕业

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/8)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS]:







© 2010-2025  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Servic