It is a very good journal in the field of operational optimization. The attitude of the editor is very rigorous, and the comments are very professional. However, the review cycle is relatively long and the speed is relatively slow.

(11) Thank | 想发顶刊

Now there are online submissions! In my 2009 submission, the previous editor said that the two experts who returned it did not give feedback.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Cannot see status without communication.

(0) Thank | 平虑草

Have you received any response to this follow-up or has it gone unnoticed?

(0) Thank | 科研混子

The quality of articles in this field is quite high, with very strong readability, much stronger than some higher-level sections

(2) Thank | asfev

11.27 Under Review

(0) Thank | 顺利毕业丫

10.21 Under review

(0) Thank | 顺利毕业丫

10.13 Under Review

(0) Thank | 顺利毕业丫

8.13 submitted to Journal
8.16 with editor
8.21 with editor
(with editor for 50 days, sent a reminder email on 10.11, received a reply stating that it is in with editor status, the editor will make a decision or send it for review, standard reply

(0) Thank | 顺利毕业丫

The second district is where JOTA should be located.

(5) Thank | 研究者

Obviously, the extensive criticism of this journal is unfair, and I oppose it.

(3) Thank | 我是笨鸟要先飞

Combining my long-term reading experience of articles published in this journal and my own submission experience, I also disagree with your viewpoint. I also believe that JOTA is one of the best magazines outside the top three journals in the industry.

(0) Thank | 沽名钓誉不可取

Based on my personal experience of submitting articles, I believe this journal is a very rigorous and high-quality journal. One of my articles went through six rounds of revisions, spanning over four years. During this process, the review comments from the reviewers in the first four rounds were all more than two pages long. Most of the suggested revisions were both professionally sound and comprehensive, contributing significantly to the improvement of the article's quality. I was fortunate enough to encounter two very diligent, responsible, professional, meticulous reviewers. I have seen someone commenting that this journal is inferior, comparing it to JMAA and so on. I disagree with their viewpoint, perhaps because they did not have the luck to encounter responsible and diligent reviewers like I did, or perhaps due to other reasons... which resulted in their negative submission experience. However, on the other hand, even the best journals (without explicitly giving examples, most peers can observe this with their own discerning eyes) occasionally include articles of average quality. But we should not deny a journal solely based on this.

(20) Thank | 沽名钓誉不可取

The magazine is good!

(18) Thank | wwywang

This comment is completely incorrect. JOTA is the best magazine after the top three journals in the industry. It is on par with COAP.

(0) Thank | 方城寺住持

"Excuse me, how can I modify the font size of the LaTeX template provided by JOTA?"

(0) Thank | 杰锋

One of the top journals in the field of operational optimization, the theoretical requirements are very high, and the review comments are very professional and difficult.Stronger than JoGO, but less than COAP

(4) Thank | 科研腊肉

Compare the journals of water, most of the articles are low.The overall level is not as good as JoGO, but not as COAP

(3) Thank | 浩如烟海

is good.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Compared with JMAA

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage: http://www.springer.com/mathematics/journal/10957

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Still quite difficult

(0) Thank | Anonymous

likes long texts, the overall level of the article is still okay, but there are also very general articles accepted for publication.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Optimization theory and application, seemingly good to select.

(0) Thank | Anonymous