Received major revisions from the peer reviewers that were incredibly detailed but nonetheless constructive. We edited our paper and sent it back to the editor. One reviewer was very satisfied with the revised draft. Another reviewer thought that one of the questions was still not answered appropriately. Five months later and we are still waiting for a final decision… slow.

(0) Thank | PCR

Too harsh! With such a big drop, who dare to invest in the future?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Submitted in March 2015, notified of major revision in mid-June, review comments showed experts were very rigorous. Submitted revised manuscript on July 10, received feedback at the end of August. One reviewer was very satisfied with the revisions, while another reviewer felt a previous issue was still not addressed properly. Re-submitted revised manuscript on August 31, currently waiting for further review. Found the review process relatively slow, and reviewers and editors had very high standards. Suggest submitting when not under tight time constraints

(0) Thank | 孤云梓露

From submission to external review took two months, and after one month of external review, unfortunately, it was rejected

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

One month for external audit, one month for modifications, then acceptance after the second audit. Online one month later

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Previously selectd 1 review, review 2About a month, the notice is accepted, minor revision.I feel that a reviewer is very friendly, because the article is quite bad in English, and gives very very detailed language guidance.It is enough to just follow the revisions of those opinions.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It was really slow, I waited over 7 months for the first trial to finish

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The pace is very slow, with high demands for English proficiency and low submission volume

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁