This journal is a good journal for pharmacology, so standards for all aspects are relatively high. For example, the level of writing English, the level of activity of compounds, the number of compounds, and the structure-activity relationships, etc., have relatively high requirements. Of course, whether the structure of compounds is new or not is more critical. Review cycle is one and a half months. If two reviewers have different opinions, the journal may find another reviewer, and then the review time will be extended, but don't believe that the longer the time means your article will be accepted; it is very likely that after four months, it may still be rejected.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Hello, is there a high chance of the manuscript being asked to make revisions after submission to this journal?

(0) Thank | 王梦琪

Beloved Journal

(0) Thank | AdamChok

Is there a high chance of being approved after the editorial review?

(0) Thank | 是春玲吖

Hello, how can I know if the manuscript has been sent for review? I have assigned an editor for a week now, but still no news. Thank you!

(0) Thank | 杰里米弗格森

I also submitted it. The revision was due on September 20th, with four reviewers: one rejection, two minor revisions, and one major revision. We conducted additional experiments and made changes to the article until December 27th, when it was finally submitted. It is still under review until now. I hope it will be accepted, as it has consumed a lot of energy.

(0) Thank | miracleF

May I ask how many days it will take for the edited version to be submitted for review?

(0) Thank | 努力啊大海桃

The editor-in-chief is really very friendly

(0) Thank | 千花文科

JMC is a top journal in the field of medicinal chemistry, representing the highest level in the field. I submitted an article and received the review results within a month, and it was accepted after the revision. The submission process for JMC is very simplified, without the need to upload high-resolution images, etc. The review speed is fast, with a response generally within three weeks. The reviewers are highly knowledgeable and provide constructive suggestions. Overall, JMC seems to prioritize innovative and comprehensive research results. This is my first article in JMC, and I hope to have more publications in the future. I also wish everyone success in their research!

(15) Thank | 惘闻

I feel that ordinary universities are okay, but they are not able to reach the level of being classified as "211" or "985" universities. Currently, the competition in domestic education is intense.

(0) Thank | 5ontheroad

Pharmaceutical Chemistry Top 1 journal

(0) Thank | 5ontheroad

According to the requirements of the journal, but not all journals have the same requirements

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Graphical Abstract can be translated as "图文摘要". The function of the Graphical Abstract is similar to that of the abstract of a paper, but it does not need to be as detailed. It focuses more on highlighting the highlights or attractive points in the article, attracting readers to help them understand the entire text at a glance and serve as a certain promotional effect

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is a Graphical abstract?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Accept after one month, Online

(0) Thank | 孤云元勋

Do submissions have to include a graphical abstract?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

First submission to JMC, with five reviewers in the first round, one minor revision, three major revisions, and one rejection. The editor requested major revisions. Received feedback after two months, and received notification of minor revisions from two reviewers after three weeks. One acceptance and two minor revisions. Waiting for the next steps the following day

(0) Thank | 孤云元勋

Submitted for modification after one month and accepted within two weeks. Hoping the first article will increase JMC to 10

(0) Thank | 北国光临

Review speed: 1.0
Emphasized research direction: Experience sharing in medicinal chemistry
Submitted twice, first time rejected instantly; second time added more data, editor-in-chief Lindsley sent it for review that night, got feedback quickly after 3 weeks, three reviewers, one major revision and two minor revisions, given 2 months to make changes. Actually finished revising in one week, but submitted a month later. Now waiting for news

(0) Thank | 北国光临

I communicated with a judge before. They are friendly. The combination of chemistry and biomedical science is promising for publication

(0) Thank | 血天谷云

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: First review took 6 weeks, with three reviewers requesting major revisions and one rejection. Editor provided two months for revisions. Second review took 7 weeks, with two reviewers agreeing to accept and one still rejecting. Editor provided two months for revisions. Third review took 3 weeks, with the chief editor providing personal feedback instead of sending it out for external review. One month was given for revisions. Fourth review was accepted in 5 days

(0) Thank | Regan John

I have completed my second round of revisions, taking nearly 7 weeks

(0) Thank | Regan John

It's only 2-3 weeks before the second trial, but it feels so slow recently

(0) Thank | 暴风秀越

Five weeks have passed since the revised manuscript was submitted, but still no news

(0) Thank | Regan John

We can only wait again, hopefully good luck!

(0) Thank | 暴风秀越