2020.1.6 the manuscript was submitted; 2020.1.7 deputy editor assigned; 2020.2.23 first review comments received: four reviewers, three required minor revisions, with 15 revision comments and evaluation as top 5%; one rejected the manuscript and suggested resubmission, with an evaluation as top 15%, and 32 review comments were raised. The editor gave us 2 months for revision. 2020.4.22 revision for the first review was returned, with more than 11,000 words for the main text, and more than 13,000 words for the response letter. 2020.4.28 the second review comments were received; no reviewers were found and the format was required to be revised. 2020.5.4 revision for the second review was returned, (I got married on 5.3, so it was almost endless for a week, being busy with the marriage and revising the manuscript at the same time). 2020.5.6 received the mail that requested again to modify the format (editor-in-chief). 2020.5.9 received the mail that requested again to modify the format (associate editor). 2020.5.13 The article was accepted. This is my first SCI article. The boss and the editor requested me to make a total of 20 revisions, and it was finally accepted in May. Hope it will be published in 5.20! Thanks to my boss, my wife and my family. It’s a bit regretful that one sentence in Acknowledgements could not be shown to her on the day of 5.3: In addition, *** wants to thank, in particular, the patience, care and support from Ms. **.

(222) Thank | Mojo

Publication History: Received: 8 December 2019 (sent for review the next day); Revised requested: 27 December 2019 (three reviewers, with included 1 big and 2 small opinions); Revised submitted: 26 January 2020 (sent to the reviewer who required a major revision, and no new reviewer was invited); Prepared to accept: 21 February 2020 (No comments for the reviewer that required a major revision previously, but the editor required us to modify the format); Accept: 26 February 2020; Published online: 26 February 2020. Title: Heterostructured NiS2/ZnIn2S4 Realizing Toroid-Like Li2O2 Deposition in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries with Low-Donor-Number Solvents. The link is: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.9b09646

(15) Thank | Anjun Hu

Submitted to Nano on December 29, 2018, and it was assigned to Prof. Wolfgang Parak, the associate editor. I received the comments of the first review on January 11, 2019. The editor gave two months to make up the experiment and revise the manuscript. There were 4 reviewers. The first reviewer required a major revision and raised 12 questions. The second reviewer rejected the manuscript and questioned the originality of the article. The third reviewer required a minor revision and raised 4 questions. The fourth reviewer required a minor revision and raised 6 questions. I submitted the revised manuscript on March 2, 2019, and I received the reviewers’ comments again on March 20, 2019, the paper was arbitrated, and the manuscript was reviewed for the second time. The editor gave a month to us for revising and resubmitting. All the three reviewers agreed to accept it directly in the first review. So other four reviewers were invited. Three reviewers gave the comments of minor revision and one rejected it. The article was revised and submitted on April 15, 2019 and I received the email of the ready for pre-acceptance of this article on the morning of April 18, 2019. On the morning of April 23, 2019, I received an email requesting to revise the format and at four o'clock in the next day’s afternoon, I submitted the revised one. The article was officially accepted on April 25, 2019. Nano is of high quality and rigorous, which was reviewed by 8 reviewers during the time. I was very excited at the acceptance from our small research team and thanks to the editor of Prof. Wolfgang Parak. Just want to commemorate my first article on Nano. if necessary, you can contact me with my WeChat of t642991874 with the verification information of Nano submission consultation, otherwise the request will not be approved.

(415) Thank | ZhangXingdqwc

I submitted my manuscript at the end of May; it was assigned that day to Editor Wolfgang Parak. Three days later the manuscript was sent out to three reviewers. After one month, the reviews came back asking for minor revision, which were to be returned within two months. After I submitted the revision, the editor sent the manuscript back to the original reviewers and two additional reviewers. This time the review time took several months. One of the original reviewers made a very unreasonable request. The other two reviewers asked for minor revisions. The allowed another two months for revision. In the end the manuscript was accept. It had a total of 5 reviewers, 4 good and 1 bad. I feel that the requirements for this journal are quite high.

(29) Thank | minghai

The submission has been reviewed, but I can't see the status right now. However, the review comments came back, and it was still rejected.

(0) Thank | greedyboy

Accepting non-commissioned work, be bold and submit your ideas. However, will the grammar of "everybodies" be written out?

(0) Thank | superceng

The response is really nice: I have been in "Awaiting decision" status for 3 days now. The review should be almost done. It's too slow. It has been almost a month and a half since the second review. It's agonizing.

(0) Thank | yanluo123

Reply to yanluo123: The display of "in peer review" on 7.8 is not because it was submitted for review on 7.8, but rather because the system was updated on 7.8, which is why these detailed statuses are now showing. Before the update, submissions would only show as "under review."

(0) Thank | 我真的很不错腻

Indeed, the recent changes I made took more than forty days to review, which is indeed very unusual.

(0) Thank | hewenfeng

It may really need to wait for 52 days for the review.

(0) Thank | hewenfeng

No, it's just that the editing process for the submission was only completed a week ago.

(0) Thank | Acarboner

It has been several days, what does this state represent? Is it waiting for the editorial comments to come back and make a decision?

(0) Thank | hewenfeng

How many days does the editorial review usually take? It has been in this status for six or seven days, wasn't it supposed to have a decision within 1-4 days?

(3) Thank | Acarboner

My paper has been handed over to the editor for Huliangbing, currently undergoing editorial review. Is this for submission or not yet? It has been 16 days already.

(0) Thank | 子沐

Under review for one month, why hasn't it been sent for final review yet? Is the editor overwhelmed with too many submissions?

(0) Thank | yanluo123

It has been over a month, but should this situation have already been decided for submission but the reviewer has not been found yet?

(0) Thank | hewenfeng

The same situation, has been in "received" status for over a month, not sure what's going on.

(0) Thank | hewenfeng

6.11 Returned after review revisions
6.11-7.8 In the past month, it shows under review
7.8--- It shows in peer review (should this be the status before submission for review?)
Has the editor not submitted for a second review in the past month???

(0) Thank | yanluo123

Hello host, may I ask how your article is coming along?

(0) Thank | paofu

24 June Submited
28 June Editor assigned 
09 July In peer review

(0) Thank | Graphene Man

The submission was made on May 28th and assigned to editor Il-Doo Kim on June 3rd. However, the ACS publication center still shows "submission received" and Paragon shows "under review." Can I confirm whether it has been a month and the submission has not been sent for review yet, or is it just that the status cannot be seen at the moment?

(0) Thank | greedyboy

May I ask how long does it take for your appeal to be processed? It has been forty days already and I have not heard anything yet.

(0) Thank | Yinzong

Hello, may I ask how long does it take for you to receive the result of your appeal?

(0) Thank | Yinzong

Likewise, I also just assigned it to Dean Ho. How long did it take you to decide at that time?

(0) Thank | 中中中22

Likewise, I also chose her, but it's been four days and I still haven't been assigned to her. I don't know what's going on. Have you been assigned yet?

(0) Thank | 中中中22