The reviewer's comments are rather detailed, and it had been accepted after careful replied.

(0) Thank | cherry304

The editor is very professional and the efficiency is quite high. The three reviewers providd detailed comments. This is a good journal. The number of articles accepted is only about 1%.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Could you please tell me at what stage is this magazine in process status?

(1) Thank | Derrick Virginia

Sent an email to inquire about the status, and received a rejection two days later, suggesting to resubmit. ?

(0) Thank | 璃月雅致

Generally speaking, waiting a few weeks is relatively normal. If you are concerned about any changes in the submission status, you may consider contacting the editorial department through the contact information provided on the journal's website to inquire about the status of your submission

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Research Focus: Infectious Diseases Experience Sharing: How long has this magazine been with the editor? It has been half a month since submission and it is still with the editor

(0) Thank | 璃月雅致

When explaining your innovative point, it is important to focus on describing the deficiencies of past research, and articulate your solution clearly and comprehensively. Innovation requires the use of introduction skills to highlight content that is beneficial to you. In order to emphasize the innovation of your research, it is necessary to choose among numerous citations ways that can highlight the differences and characteristics of your research. For example: (1) time issues; (2) research methods issues; (3) research area issues; (4) uncertainty; (5) propose your own hypotheses to verify

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Introduction includes all or some of the following five elements: introduction of the background of the research field, its significance, current development (insufficient), the purpose of this research, and a summary of the research content

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How is the innovation in the introduction of the article reflected?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

What should be included in the introduction?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

May I ask if you need the original data?

(0) Thank | t

Do we need to pay for the layout of this magazine?

(0) Thank | 凌霄玉环

Do we need to pay for the layout of this magazine, or can we choose non-OA?

(0) Thank | 凌霄玉环

This magazine has been called by this name since 1904, abbreviated as JID, a top journal in the field of infectious diseases

(0) Thank | Douglas Wolf

Submitted on Jun 08, 2021, for review on the 10th, looking forward to the editorial feedback

(0) Thank | Will Ellen

Submit for review and revision after half a month of submission, two months for revisions. Returned the day before and received it early the next morning. The editors and assistant editors are very nice, and their response speed is really fast, unexpectedly so. The magazine has many restrictions on the quantity of text and images, but it also promotes the optimization and integration of my articles.

(2) Thank | wenjing77

Are only one corresponding author allowed now? I didn't see it in the guidelines. It's been almost a month since submission, still under review. wmw90 2017-09-03

(0) Thank | Steward Jackson

Instant 4.77

(0) Thank | 辉夜碧秋

Can you take on this case?

(0) Thank | 天罡弘雅

Has this journal changed its name? Was it previously called Immunology and Infectious Diseases?

(0) Thank | 蒂芙尼德莱塞

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The reviewer's comments were quite detailed, and after a careful response, the submission was accepted

(0) Thank | 五轮耀兴

A very good magazine, although it was rejected. The editor quickly decided to send it for review after submission, and about a month later, two external review opinions were received. Perhaps my article was poorly written, and the editor ultimately rejected it. However, the reviewers' comments were still quite good and were very helpful for revising the article

(0) Thank | 金梅小可爱

Very good journal, although rejected.After the submission, the editor decided to submit the review soon. About one month later, two external opinions were obtained.It may be that the article was written too badly, and the editor finally rejected the manuscript.But the reviewer's opinion is still quite good.For the modification of the article is very helpful

(0) Thank | 爱吃水果糖

Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: The editors are very professional. As my research is on Treponema pallidum, a niche area of study, I expected some challenges. However, the editors provided very professional comments on the manuscript. The first round of revisions was returned within two weeks of submission, and after a month of further revisions, the paper was accepted for publication. The efficiency of the process was exceptional

(0) Thank | Moses Norton

The editor is very professional. Because of the research related to Treponema pallidum, it belongs to niche research, but the editor still provides very very professional review opinions.The submission will return to the first revision in two weeks, and will be returned after one month of modification. After returning, the editor will directly accept, which is very efficient.

(1) Thank | 191404543@qq.com