Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J EXP BOT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0022-0957 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1460-2431 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 6.20% | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://academic.oup.com/jxb | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://submit-jxb.oxfordjournals.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1950 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 466 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-0957%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY: | Write a review |
Author: 邓昌平 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-06-25 09:29:06 The editor was very serious and responsible. There were a lot of comments raised by the reviewers, and each comment was meaningful. 21 Jan 2020, submission. One round of major revision, and two rounds of minor revision; 15 Jun 2020, accept. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 连雨飘 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-03-31 21:52:28 The article was submitted in September last year. More than one month later, it was recommended to be rejected and resubmitted. It was resubmitted and accepted at the end of March. It has been 6 months. It was affected by Christmas, Chinese New Year and the pandemic during the period. However, the overall speed was slow. It was mainly because I met an associate editor who processed slowly. The minor revision during the period will not be processed until half a month later. The speed of the reviewers and editors is average. The requirements of the associate editor are strict, and various minor grammatical issues must be revised one by one. But after all, it was accepted. Luck in misfortune. ![]() ![]() |
Author: wznn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-03-15 03:03:38 I submitted once, and the manuscript was rejected in less than a month. I had better luck with my second submission. I quite like the journal. The editor is very serious. If you like plant science, you can follow the "Forefront of Plant Science." ![]() ![]() |
Author: Booooooo Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-17 11:00:12 You, a medical professional, came here to comment... You're in the wrong place, aren't you? ![]() ![]() |
Author: agatecatcat Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-02 23:05:00 May I ask all the teachers, how long have you all been waiting for the submitted status, and is there any action needed for this status? ![]() ![]() |
Author: zsxx Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-25 15:38:33 Publishing repetitive or marginal research lacking innovation. ![]() ![]() |
Author: hcbb Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-25 15:37:08 The review speed is slow, the research methods are not rigorous, and the citation rate is low. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ncbsaavb Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-25 15:33:26 It is reasonable to lower it to the second district. ![]() ![]() |
Author: hgdfsdfas Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-25 15:31:22 The actual level is average, and the review process is lengthy. ![]() ![]() |
Author: dxzz Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-25 15:18:47 Frustrating, wishing you get worse and worse. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 马哥 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-23 19:00:12 Looking back, it's really a bitter journey, from submission to acceptance took 10 months. 2022.12.10 Submitted 2023.3.24 Reject Resubmit 2023.4.26 Revision returned 2023.7.26 Received revision comments, didn't specify major or minor 2023.8.26 Revision returned 2023.9.12 Accepted In my research field, JXB is a well-known old journal with good reputation. Its status in the field is indeed lower than NewP and PP, occasionally on par with PJ and PCE. Calling it a first-tier gatekeeper is reasonable, but demoting it to second-tier is a bit excessive... The Chinese Academy of Sciences' categorization is really like playing a game. ![]() ![]() |
Author: amp Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-07 19:40:12 The second district feels very reasonable, much better than Plant Journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: Gene+Model+Wheat Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-24 02:20:30 Why was my paper rejected again this year? Is there still hope if I resubmit it? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 茜54655 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-12-25 18:57:38 One third of the articles are review articles, with the rest being other types. The impact factor is raised by reviews. The actual quality is very mediocre ![]() ![]() |
Author: 辉夜新柔 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-26 16:15:52 After waiting for over ten days, my status changed to under review ![]() ![]() |
Author: 蒋振忠 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-25 20:43:10 How long does the initial editing review take? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 大白兔 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-22 14:43:03 The quality of the journal is fine, but the review process is a bit slow. The first round of review took 4 months, and after revisions were submitted, the second round of review took 8 months. The feedback in the second round was even worse than the first, and I feel that it has delayed too much time. I'm sorry for any inconvenience, but I have decided not to resubmit the revised manuscript. I have lost interest ![]() ![]() |
Author: wangqi77 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-21 13:22:23 Too slow ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北海洪飞 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-19 21:11:05 After my revision, it is under review. Is it sent for review or under peer review? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 北海洪飞 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-19 11:35:08 The assistant editor found a problem with the image during the rework, so we made the changes and resubmitted. Will this have any impact? ![]() ![]() |
Author: narzy Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-18 11:11:03 It's just slow, my paper was rejected after 4 months of review, now I have been waiting in the queue for 4 months to submit to another journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: narzy Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-18 11:09:12 It took a super long time for the review, and it took a full 4 months for the feedback to come back. It was rejected, and then it took 4 months before being accepted for PJ ![]() ![]() |
Author: 界静 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-09 22:38:52 Two months have passed since the submission and it is still under peer review, with no news yet ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一颗冰糖心 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-08-26 23:58:41 The first submission, I don't know how the speed will be, I hope it will be accepted. If rejected, please reject it quickly. I have seen comments below saying it's very slow, with an average waiting period of 6 months. It's terrifying ![]() ![]() |
Author: xiao李 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-08-19 17:28:37 Too slow ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page |