The publication volume of this journal is extremely low, and most of the articles published are basically products of the same circle. My senior sister's work was published on OCF for 7 months, and a work with more than 80% repetition was published on it, which is ridiculous. My senior brother's work on OBC, after two months, a catalyst work that is exactly the same appeared on it, basically the same work. I admire the current big shots in China, is it not good to put the self-entertainment skills in scientific research?

(0) Thank | qwe309

I'm not trying to badmouth this journal, but more than half of the articles are from people with connections, including various instances of plagiarism and redundant publications. It's really not as good as some second-tier journals, because those journals also have many outstanding works. My senior colleague and I once submitted an article to this journal, but it was rejected without any review comments after submission. Two articles from our research group were also rejected by this journal, but the impact factor is not high. Our boss directly said that this journal is low quality.

(0) Thank | qwe309

How can a journal with an impact factor of over 8 be considered as a tier 3 or 4 journal? You can't just insist on being rejected, can you?

(0) Thank | 陈志龙

The trash in the garbage is actually a magazine of only 3 or 4 districts.

(0) Thank | zkylj2025