This journal mainly focuses on the combination of engineering application, calculation and theory, and pays certain attention to the depth of theoretical methods. Each round of review lasted about 2 months, and the reviewers were relatively serious.

(0) Thank | MeyoungLC

Limited number of articles. Somewhat difficult.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Bro, is there no "we" stage for this? You went straight to "UR" on the first day, is this for review?

(0) Thank | z2

5.12 was for major repairs, and on 5.31 it had to go back for rework.

(0) Thank | wujiemc

Hello, may I ask if the review comments have come back yet?

(0) Thank | 大牛侍卫

Hello, may I ask if you have received your current opinion back?

(0) Thank | 大牛侍卫

01/21/2025 Decision - Accept As Is
01/02/2025 Revised Submission Sent to Journal
12/23/2024 Decision - Revise for Re-Review
11/24/2024 Revised Submission Sent to Journal
11/05/2024 Decision - Revise for Re-Review
09/19/2024 New Submission Sent to Journal Office
09/19/2024 Manuscript Number Assigned

(0) Thank | jack in the box

The feeling is cumulative.

(0) Thank | wujiemc

Without the "we" status, submitting is "stj," and then it is "ur" when under review.

(0) Thank | wujiemc

Hi, may I ask if this journal has a "with editor" status, or is it directly under review (UR)?

(0) Thank | 美女杰青

Two days later, it was directly rejected by the editor. Oh well, it's not easy to deal with now.

(0) Thank | jedel

20250303 submitted to journal
20250304 under review

(0) Thank | wujiemc

The submission made on the 20th is currently in the "Submitted to Journal" status. I don't know what will happen next.

(0) Thank | jedel

Is the number the amount of submissions for the current year or is it cumulative? If it's for the current year, it seems like a lot compared to the annual publication volume.

(0) Thank | tumbler

How long does it take to get the results after submitting the manuscript? I have been receiving "under review" status since I submitted it, and it has been over a month now.

(1) Thank | wujiemc

After the initial review of the submission, it will be returned for revisions, and if accepted, it will be published directly after two months.

(0) Thank | 魏晓晓晓

Has the editor agreed to start over?

(0) Thank | 古神仁修

This is my first post, giving some encouragement for continuing research in the future.Three reviewers, two feel very serious, and the third also said that it does not match the journal.Because of the many things, it took a dozen days to modify it, and submitted it before the deadline, I was very embarrassed.But it was accepted in about a month.I am talking about the publication now.

(1) Thank | siyuurai

My submission experience is a bit more complicated: the first shot, 3 reviewers, the first two gave a lot of comments, can be seen to be carefully read; the third reviewer metamorphosis, saidThe scope does not match the journal, and the simple two sentences are directly rejected.Estimated that it was not seen, time is not enough, just find a reason to refuse.At that time, he was jealous of him: reviewer mainly looked at the quality of the article, and the editor let you review it, indicating that the scope is consistent, so what is the reason for it?In the end, the editor integrated the opinions of the three reviewers and gave a direct rejection.But we still don't give up, argue with the editor, saying that the scope is consistent, can we re-submit.Ed

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://ascelibrary.org/cpo/

(0) Thank | Anonymous