I am the one on the sixth floor. The article rejected by Journal of Biomechanics was transferred to Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, and it was accepted in 3 months. I spent 8 months here, which is really annoying.

(7) Thank | 半城~

I was replied that this journal only accepted 25% articles, and many other words were said; in a word, it was rejected. The comments of the reviewers were simple, that is, they didn’t interest in it. I feel that it is not easy to be accepted. It is easier to be accepted by journals whose impact factors are 1 or much more points higher than this.

(9) Thank | 兔兔兔

I submitted an article before which was rejected after I waited for more than 3 months; because I really want to have an article in JoB, I submitted another one recently. It's been almost 3 months... Anxious.

(2) Thank | Paper5505

1 month for a rejection.

(0) Thank | xz0003@surrey.ac.uk

Hello, may I ask if you have a submission template for this journal? Could you please share a copy? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 郭寒媛

Submitted on 19th November 2024, the manuscript was rejected after the first review on 3rd January 2025. One reviewer provided four minor revision suggestions, which were considered quite helpful. However, the other reviewer's comments were simply to refer to the attached file, even though there was no attachment in the rejection letter from the editor. Despite sending multiple emails, there has been no response, leaving a sense of irresponsibility.

(0) Thank | proc

In the field of biomechanics, this is a well-established top player, although the influence is a bit low, it is definitely recognized in the field. Having been engaged in biomechanics for more than 5 years, this is the first JoB article. According to the boss, I have truly entered the threshold of biomechanics. The reviewers are absolutely professional. In the first major revision, two reviewers raised 39 questions, and it took 26 pages for revisions. The second minor revision, the second reviewer raised minor issues with 3 images, and then the editor directly accepted it. The timeline is as follows for reference by outstanding colleagues:
7.30 Submission
9.10 First major revision (only one major revision opportunity, otherwise rejection)
11.4 Major revision returned
12.2 Second minor revision (accepted after minor revision)
12.4 Minor revision returned
12.9 Accepted

(0) Thank | Britton

@H Brother, how is your article going? I also submitted a JOB, and it has been with the editor for 11 days. The deadline has changed once during this time.

(0) Thank | xyxy17sgs

10.26 Submission
12.14 Major Revision, many review comments but still quite friendly
2.11 Minor Revision
3.31 Response to Review: Accepted after minor revision
4.10 Acceptance

(0) Thank | 灌水臭臭

@Guanshuishou, my revisions have also been returned to the reviewers, not accepted by the editor's decision

(0) Thank | VFLNN

@H, it seems that the reviewers have provided their comments but not all of them have been returned yet

(0) Thank | VFLNN

Hello, I would like to ask if there is a review after the minor repairs

(0) Thank | 灌水臭臭

Hello, I have a question. My submission to With Editor has been about 1 month (the time in between changed once). What is the situation? Has a reviewer not been assigned yet?

(0) Thank | H

10.24 submission (returned once due to formatting)
12.05 major revisions given 8 weeks, reviewer comments friendly and non-trivial (feels quite challenging to balance both)
1.21 revised and resubmitted, wrote 20 pages of response
1.29 decision: minor revisions accepted
2.05 revised and resubmitted
2.20 decision: accepted after proof submission
Summary: Finally got a JBM paper, although the impact factor is low, but can't resist the boss always saying biomechanics is hard without this
I feel that it is slightly harder to publish in JBM compared to CMPB and CBM, the strict length limits and requirement for innovation seem to block a lot of articles

(0) Thank | neu老皮仔

MDPI was rejected, but this one made a lot of money

(0) Thank | gogogogoing

Brother, can you please check on my article? It's currently in "With Editor" status, but the deadline has changed twice. Is it with the associate editor or already in the peer review process?

(0) Thank | H

What else can be said about the top journal in the field of biomechanics?

(0) Thank | bsustan

Submitted on September 11, 2023, with two reviewers assigned. Revised on October 18, 2023, and received positive feedback. Accepted on December 14, 2023. The editor-in-chief mentioned in the revision comments that the journal only allows one round of revisions, so revisions must be carefully considered

(17) Thank | Feng

Submitted on September 11, 2023, and reviewed by two reviewers. 
Revised on October 18, 2023, with positive feedback. 
Accepted on December 14, 2023. 
The editor-in-chief mentioned in the revision feedback that the journal only allows one major revision. If the revision is not satisfactory, the submission will be rejected. Therefore, it is important to make the most of the revision

(0) Thank | Feng

This journal is considered a top journal in biomechanics, but its impact factor is relatively low. It does not have an advantage in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' ranking. It is possible that journals with higher impact factors are more likely to be accepted. However, for those in the field of biomechanics, they always hope to have an article published in this journal with high recognition, so they can only bite the bullet and submit

(1) Thank | gogogogoing

Really found out, if a few sentences do not meet the journal's format, they will be rejected.

(0) Thank | gogogogoing

Hello, I resubmitted after major revisions about a month ago. The current status is "Required Reviews Completed". I would like to know how much longer I need to wait to receive a definite reply. How long did it take for you to receive a response after resubmission? Thank you!

(0) Thank | 犀利的橘子

I would like to ask, is the requirement of 3500 words strict? Should it include references and captions for figures?

(0) Thank | soxbai

I happened to catch up with the internal transition of the journal with this article, which took a long time. It was submitted on August 4th, 2019 and accepted on May 28th, 2020. During this period, it went through a major revision and was reviewed by two reviewers. One reviewer accepted it directly, while the other, possibly a junior colleague, raised some sharp questions. The editorial department only provided one opportunity for revision, stating that if the modifications were done well, it would be accepted; otherwise, it would be rejected. My advisor felt like giving up, but I really wanted to publish in a top journal like this. Finally, after putting in a lot of effort, it passed. I suggest not only focusing on the impact factor, as this year's impact factor indicates that it may be artificially manipulatable. It's better to consult your advisor or experienced researchers in your field to determine which journals are more recognized.

(7) Thank | 坚实的蛋壳

Normal, with a high volume of submissions, waiting for two months is not excessive, please be patient

(0) Thank | 孤云春荷