The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is a very good journal.

(0) Thank | Dafydd

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: 50% submission rate, rejected within a week.

(0) Thank | 心意清妙

What happened afterwards?

(0) Thank | 重阳秋寒

I'm afraid mine might end up in tragedy too

(0) Thank | 重阳秋寒

Yesterday I revised a paper, and it took one month for review. Very nice

(0) Thank | 腾逸baby

Please please (ಥ_ಥ

(0) Thank | Dominic Blume

Submitted an article today in hopes of good luck

(0) Thank | Dominic Blume

How should I go about finding reviewers for this?

(0) Thank | 太山以蓝

Present the research results in the order of research questions and hypotheses, or in the order of research methods. Using chronological order as the arrangement order, arranging according to importance, or categorizing by different themes are all effective methods. When deciding on the presentation structure of research results, one must consider the readers, the basis, and the most important research objectives

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Figures or charts must be numbered and organized according to the sequence mentioned in the paper

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What kind of logical order is needed to organize the results during the sorting process?

(0) Thank | 陶宜三岁啦

During the sorting process, which charts should be placed together?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

During the process of submitting a manuscript, it asks for recommended reviewers. How should I fill this out if I don't want my affiliation to be revealed? Urgent, thank you

(0) Thank | 彭泽Sama

I have a question regarding the process of submitting a manuscript. There is a section for recommending reviewers, but I am not sure how to fill it out. I do not want my employer to know about this, so I am in a hurry. Thank you

(0) Thank | 彭泽Sama

Two days after submission, the status "decision in process" usually suggests bad news

(0) Thank | Dawn Moulton

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: One week after submission, the editor provided major revisions, and after submission, it was reviewed in 5 days by 3 reviewers. Nearly 20 suggestions were given, focusing on statistics, language, and the theme of the article. After major revisions, it took 14 days for minor revisions, and another 14 days after resubmission for acceptance. The review comments were fair and nice, with a fairly high efficiency

(0) Thank | 树柏大叔

It belongs to a very good journal in geriatrics, and I wrote an article this year that I think is pretty good and I want to try to submit it!

(0) Thank | 是你的紫安呀

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I submitted a clinical article to a highly efficient journal, and it only took one month from the first review to acceptance. The feedback was constructive, and as long as the revised article is of interest, there is a chance of acceptance, even if major revisions are required

(0) Thank | 刚捷可爱吗

The past was good, but it's frightening how much it has fallen now. I hope to get back to a 3-point level next year, but it may be really difficult

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Research focus: Mental disorders; Schizophrenia

(0) Thank | 七伤依萱