It took two months for review, and accepted one month after revision. Submitted on Aug 2019; approved on Nov 2019; published online on Mar 2020.

(2) Thank | ChuckyZhang

This journal belongs to the upper middle and upper reaches of the aerospace field, and the number of articles published in the periodical year is very small. The review result of first review was given in 10 months, and it was accepted after 2 months of second review. All the journals in Aerospace professional are slow, and the 12-month cycle is fast.

(2) Thank | amen2100

3 reviewers. Very fast. Detailed feedback.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

It may be a new method, with 7 experts agreeing to review. The first round of review took 7 months, with feedback received from 6 reviewers. Responses were provided one by one. The second round of review lasted for six months, with 4 reviewers agreeing and 2 reviewers having disputes. Continued responses were made, and over a month later, the 2 reviewers had further comments, but the Associate Editor (AE) approved, so only the AE needed to see the third round of revisions. The manuscript was returned on a Friday, possibly during a holiday, and no one handled it over the weekend. However, it changed to "Under review" on Monday night, and was directly accepted on Tuesday night.

Special thanks to the AE for the opportunity. It was a tough submission process, and the reviewers' comments were very professional, some of which exceeded the author's abilities, but every effort was made to resolve and explain them, ultimately gaining the AE's approval. Will continue to submit in the future.

There is a 12-hour time difference with the AE, and typically receive review decisions in the midnight and early morning hours.

20230602 submitted
20240104 revisions
20240208 submitted
20240829 revisions
20240905 submitted
20241025 minor revisions (revise for Editor only)
20241102 submitted
20241105 accepted

(0) Thank | Shaw009

Excuse me, where can I download this Word template? Please let me know.

(0) Thank | 雷小瞎

Same question, are the figures and tables not included in the main text but rather placed directly after the references?

(0) Thank | canglangzhige

The journal has strict formatting requirements, and the editorial review and reviewer feedback are prompt, making it a good old-fashioned journal!

(0) Thank | 叶开123

How long does it take from application to hiring?

(0) Thank | rrrsd

Hello, is the final submission in Word format?

(0) Thank | 爆炸猪

Is the title list of this picture a table for drawing a picture? Or is the picture listed behind the manuscript? It should just be a list of pictures, right?

(0) Thank | 人工智能小菜鸡

Journals have strict requirements for formatting and uploading methods, so it is recommended to take them seriously

(0) Thank | 鹤顶红

20230607 submitted,
20230609 under review,
20240118 revise requested, 3 reviewers' comments, comments are professional, 2 reviewers gave positive feedback on initial submission, 1 reviewer gave negative feedback
20240121 revised submitted
20240222 accepted
Review process was very slow, possibly due to difficulty in finding reviewers in the specific field. Detailed explanations were provided for reviewers who leaned towards rejection. Reviewers' comments were all professional, with different focuses. After revisions, the paper was accepted, but unfortunately the subject area of aerospace is rated relatively low

(0) Thank | 鹤顶红

After being hired, they are asking me to remove the images from the manuscript, and also to reference the images by file name. What does this mean?

(0) Thank | 炒鸡无敌大魔王

This journal has been downgraded to Tier 4, which corresponds to the difficulty level of Tier 2. Let's strive for Tier 4!

(1) Thank | Cooper

Major repair + minor repair
Accepted on 2023.12.19
Lasted 5 months

(0) Thank | Hongze Du

Sorry, typed wrong, Under Review

(0) Thank | 大白猴

23.04.12 Under Reviewer
I have been reviewing the manuscript and am still waiting for a response. Please wait patiently

(0) Thank | 大白猴

20220412 Submission,
20220413 Under review,
20220630 Notice of major revisions, given 45 days, opinions from 3 reviewers, professional opinions, favorable evaluation of the initial draft
20220813 Return of major revisions
20220923 Second round of reviews received, given 15 days, opinions from 3 reviewers, few issues
20221005 Return of second revisions
20221124 Official website status shows "accept as is," then according to email requirements, modify the formatting and submit a final draft on the website along with relevant materials.
20221213 Editor sends email officially notifying acceptance,
During the Production phase, the author needs to check the website daily to view the status of the paper and assist in making necessary revisions. Prompt replies are required.
Overall, the process from submission to finding reviewers was completed in 2 days, which is very fast. If the revision process is even faster, the overall time can be shortened. The opinions of the reviewers were very reasonable and helpful in improving the paper. The process took 8 months in the field of aerospace, which cannot be considered slow but also not fast compared to 5 to 6 months in the field of robotics and automation control.
I am preparing to submit to this journal again in the future.

(2) Thank | taibudong

20220412 Submission
20220413 Under review
20220630 Notification of major revisions, given 45 days, 3 reviewers' comments, comments are professional, overall positive evaluation of the initial draft
20220813 Major revisions returned
20220923 Second round of reviewer comments received, given 15 days, few issues mentioned
20221005 Second revisions returned
20221124 Official website status shows "accept as is," then according to email requirements, modify the format and submit a final draft and relevant materials on the website.
20221213 Later, the editor sends an email formally notifying acceptance.
Later, in the production stage, the author needs to log in to the official website every day to check the status of the paper. You will be asked to assist in modifying the journal's proofreading, and timely responses are necessary until the galley proofs are sent for your confirmation.
Overall, the process from submission to finding reviewers was completed in 2 days, which is very fast. If the return for revisions is faster, the overall time can be shortened. The reviewers' comments were very helpful in improving the paper. The entire process in the aerospace field took 8 months, which cannot be considered slow, but compared to the 5 to 6 months in the robotics field for classmates, it is not fast.
I am planning to submit to this journal again in the future.

(1) Thank | taibudong

Hello, when I was returning the item for repair, the system kept saying that the file I uploaded was not in accordance with the guide. However, the guide on the official website is written very vaguely. I would like to ask for your advice. Sorry for the trouble.

(0) Thank | wyccbit

Here is the translation of the text into English:

"Here comes another water thesis."
09/14/2022 New Submission Sent to Journal Office
01/04/2023 Decision - Revise for Re-Review
01/07/2023 Revised Submission Sent to Journal
04/20/2023 Decision - Accept As Is

(0) Thank | magic98

At that time, the second trial lasted about three months and has now been hired.

(0) Thank | wrc

I have been waiting for the second review for 12 months now, and it is said that they cannot find the previous reviewer.

(0) Thank | 于小七

May I ask how long it took for the final review to be accepted? Thank you for providing the information. My second review has been under review for over two months.

(0) Thank | 2022_haha

Received the first round of comments after one month of submission, made minor revisions and directly accepted.

(1) Thank | 老木头