Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | AM J BOT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0002-9122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1537-2197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 7.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.amjbot.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/AJB | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | BOTANICAL SOC AMER INC, PO BOX 299, ST LOUIS, USA, MO, 63166-0299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0002-9122%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Fast, 2-4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-19 19:48:00 The American Journal of Botany is the flagship journal for botonists. AJB is an internationally recognized journal, published monthly since 1914, and accepts research about various aspects of plant biology. AJB publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, and important research that is suitable for a wide range of audiences and plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systems science), all levels of plant tissue (molecular ecosystems), as well as all allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). ![]() ![]() |
Author: karaeco Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-13 02:52:53 Although the impact factor is not high, this journal is the official publication of the American Botanical Society. Despite its low publication volume, the review process is very strict with expert reviewers and editors. After submitting in April of the 23rd year, the manuscript was rejected in October. However, both reviewers and editors were very interested in the research, and invited a resubmission after revisions. Following their suggestions, the revisions involved major changes and some additional analysis. The revised manuscript was resubmitted in November and accepted in February of the 25th year. The editor was very responsible and was able to identify even minor issues, greatly improving the quality of the article. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 14:03:26 The main task of the introduction is to outline the basic content and structure of the entire text for the author. It is important to comprehensively summarize the past and present situation in the field, especially the latest developments and references to classic literature from the past. Analyze the limitations of past research and clarify the innovative points of one's own research ![]() ![]() |
Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 08:40:20 The content of the introduction is arranged in three to four levels of paragraphs ![]() ![]() |
Author: 八坂篷蔚 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-28 16:28:10 How to write an introduction? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Oswald Edie Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-27 13:04:00 How many paragraphs are generally included in an introduction? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 米开朗基罗 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-07-13 07:29:17 Classic journals in the field of botany, with a history of over a hundred years, publish approximately 150 articles per year. The rejection rate is around 80-85%. The initial review process is relatively fast, with feedback for major revisions provided within two to three months. After submitting the revised manuscript, minor revisions are typically requested within a month. It takes another month for the revised manuscript to be accepted. The publication process is slow, with online publication occurring six months after acceptance. Both the editor-in-chief and the associate editor encountered during the submission process were very helpful. The overall communication throughout the submission process was very pleasant. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 赶路的人 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-07-07 14:55:42 Has anyone submitted recently? Can you share your experience? ![]() ![]() |
Author: matthew Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-11 13:25:44 Minor repair. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 雪梦公子 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-11-11 13:02:22 Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: Minor revisions ![]() ![]() |
Author: 文德小姐姐 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-07-13 11:48:12 Can I ask if the review process is fast? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 虎鹤英悟 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-27 14:23:44 Just submitted an article. Hope it gets accepted! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Werner MacPherson Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-19 19:37:07 Just submitted an article, hoping it will be accepted! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 塞缪尔兰斯洛特 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-22 12:25:01 Can it be strengthened? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-18 10:10:32 3分边缘,希望能维持稳定,略有上升也不错。 : 3 points ahead, hoping to maintain stability, a slight increase would also be nice ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-09-12 16:07:20 The review process is too slow ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-06-19 12:10:31 Review speed: 2.0 Experience sharing: My first submission, the editor and reviewer were both very careful and attentive. It was rejected, but I have made revisions and resubmitted. Currently under review ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-04-17 12:23:08 Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0. Sharing of experiences: The magazine has a very good reputation, the editor is very responsible, especially the editor of plant biochemistry technology, who is very dedicated and communicates well. The review process is fast, with a first review cycle of 29 days and feedback for major revisions given within one week. The tentative accept feedback typically involves minor details and layout adjustments, with a request for revisions within ten days. The revised version is accepted the next day. A very fast and responsible magazine. Great! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-12 23:54:51 The section for primer has been separated, other categories are not good for submission anymore~ It has been taken advantage of by more than fifty articles in 12 years ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-09 10:41:31 Why can't the impact factor of this journal increase? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-07 21:05:57 The molecular direction is relatively fast, while the others are very slow ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-11-28 13:06:32 Next year we should be able to reach third place ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-11-28 09:42:59 Can we score 3 points next year? Let's discuss it ![]() ![]() |
Author: 中原诗蕊 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-18 09:32:33 Which direction are you leaning towards? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-17 12:03:05 My article was accepted, it depends on whether the logic is good. As long as the logic is clear and the reasoning is well explained, it should be accepted without difficulty. Of course, it also depends on whether there is an interesting phenomenon. The more interesting it is, the clearer it should be explained, the better ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 Next Last (To Page |