There are certain innovation requirements for work. If the innovation is not great, the reviewer will give a major revision if he is in a good mood. But the major revision is the most troublesome, and the reviewers take the problem very seriously. Although not comparable to Inverse Problems, it is also an authoritative journal in the field of inverse problems. The review time is very long. I don’t suggest submitting manuscripts to this journal if you are anxious to graduate and want to publish papers soon. It is easy to be accepted for the manuscript of great innovation. 2018-9-10 Submission. 2019-2-2 Major revision, 3 reviewers. 2019-4-3 Submission. 2019-5-30 Major revisions were required. A reviewer agreed, 2 reviewers required major revisions. 2019-7-13 Submission. 2019-12-1 major revisions were required, a reviewer agreed, 2 required major revisions. 2020-5-18, submit. 2020-7-2, accept.

(3) Thank | schoolstudyboy

Irresponsible. 1 year review. No response to queries and a direct rejection.

(0) Thank | 小北风

The review process is really slow, without any result for 6 months. The review cycle is very long, very long.

(0) Thank | ald

slow journal published every month!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

For the journals with partial mathematics, the symbolic expression must be clear. The reviewer's questions must be answered one by one.Submission summary: http://quxiaobo.blog.edu.cn/2010/536938.html

(0) Thank | Anonymous