After waiting for nearly two months, the review comments returned to the editor-in-chief. It is estimated that the editor-in-chief must deal with a lot of manuscripts, and we haven’t received the result yet.

(3) Thank | winnerche

Submitted: 23-Sep-2019; Under review: 24-Sep-2019. The status has kept until now. During the period, I urged administrator. The administrator said very tactfully, saying that she couldn’t control the review speed of the reviewers. The first review speed of this journal was a bit slow.

(4) Thank | winnerche

It is a very good and rigorous journal which is worth being submitted to. The first review lasted 8 months and major revision was required. The second review lasted 4 months and the minor revision was required. The reviewers gave many detailed suggestions.

(0) Thank | Chris

Very slow and cautious review. 3 months. 2 months for the second review. The review comments are very meticulous and serious, and they are important for improving the article. Raised my opinion of the overall quality and rigor of the journal.

(5) Thank | 汤姆

I have been in this state for three months...

(0) Thank | Mr.X/

Could you please confirm if this journal has an "under review" process? It has been with the editor for over 20 days.

(0) Thank | uaena1

16-Jun-2024 submitted
21-Sep-2024 Major Revision
20-Nov-2024 resubmitted
26-Feb-2025 Accept

(0) Thank | C-Y L

Revised on March 5th, there is still no result now. May I ask which DP you are referring to?

(1) Thank | IMhao

Submitted on October 22, 2024
Major revision on January 13, 2025
Revised on March 3, 2025
Accepted on March 30, 2025
The process was quite fast, and the editor was very responsible. The opinions of the five reviewers were sharp and directly pointed out the key points, which greatly helped improve the quality of the paper. We replied to each of the 20 pages of revision comments and the paper was accepted directly. My advisor said that this journal is relatively well-recognized in the industry and hopes that it can be upgraded in terms of classification.

This is my first paper during my doctoral studies and it has milestone significance. I hope that your journal will continue to improve.

(0) Thank | 丁冉

The journal review process is quite fast. The submission was made on August 1, 2024, returned for revisions on October 18, 2024, revised on December 2, 2024, and accepted on February 9, 2025. The whole process took 6 months in total.

(0) Thank | tr

The normal procedure is as follows, just wait and don't worry about it.

(0) Thank | 十年水流东

Sure, just wait patiently. I have been waiting for this status for two months.

(0) Thank | 南~~

Please provide the URL for data submission, and write in the manuscript that data is available upon reasonable request. I noticed that recent publications have not provided data.

(0) Thank | I~KUN

I have submitted it for almost a week, and it is also in the hands of the journal editor.

(0) Thank | mu_bai

Excuse me, how long has your status been with the journal administrator? Do we need to send a reminder letter?

(0) Thank | YQBP525

How long is the decision pending?

(0) Thank | 暮烟水

请问你们有什么特别的需求或者要求吗？

(0) Thank | 光翟

It has been under external review all the time, and the time change is the time when I log into the system, without duplicate review; and this is the time when the first review comes out.

(0) Thank | wangmu

My status has been "with journal administrator" for almost a month now, what's going on?

(0) Thank | n60r3

Why has it been three weeks and the status is still "With Journal Administrator"?

(0) Thank | 暮烟水

Could you please clarify what is meant by the journal requiring the DOI of the uploaded data?

(0) Thank | winwin

Does this journal have a requirement for plagiarism check?

(0) Thank | 不发Natura我是苟

I hope that the classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences can be upgraded this year, and the journal in the controlled field is still relatively recognized.

(0) Thank | 公渡

The article took nearly six months to complete and is finally ready to be shared with everyone

(1) Thank | 金3201

The host's reviews are very accurate and on point!

(57) Thank | 科研大佬。