In review for 4 months.

(3) Thank | qiaochangkai

Buddy, if you're having a hard time at Sichuan University, we're in even more trouble.

(0) Thank | tential

Traditional sediment direction. The journal will be OA from 2024, and the journal's reputation is very good within the industry.
2023.09.30 submit
2023.11.14 R1 minor revisions
2023.11.28 resubmit
2024.01.06 R2 minor revisions
2024.01.10 resubmit
2024.02.07 R3 minor revisions (Detailed proof by Executive Editor in advance)
2024.03.28 Accept

(1) Thank | adrian1993

Starting in 2024, all open access, with a layout fee of 9800 RMB.
2023-09-18 Submission (related experimental research on reservoir sediment)
2023-10-30 First review (major revisions, deadline for submission is before November 28)
2023-11-02 Submitted revised draft
2023-12-16 Second review (no reviewer comments, only format changes required, deadline for submission is before December 30)
2023-12-23 Submitted revised draft
Then no updates with editor, no progress for over two months
2024-03-06 Urged once, immediately received feedback, requiring format changes and some language corrections (articles, conjunctions, punctuation).
2024-03-11 Accept

(2) Thank | huan hu an

The manuscript submitted in January 2022, and it was under review after 7 days. There were several reviewers involved during the process, which took a whole year!! It was unbelievably slow!! Then in January 2023, they rejected my submission with less than 10 comments. I suspect that the reviewers didn't take it seriously, and their suggestions made me both laugh and cry. It wasted a whole year of my time, and I'm really grateful for that! If they publish so few articles in a year, they should review them promptly instead of dragging it out for so long! I urge everyone to be cautious when submitting to this journal. I have been hurt by this experience!!!

(5) Thank | Advance_Lv

One month after submission for revision, the content of the reviewers is mediocre. I feel that this journal is overly obsessed with the formatting of the articles.
For the second revision, there were only a few scattered suggestions to change the image format. After completing the revisions and submitting them to the editor, there was no change for two months.
For the third revision, a few more images were changed, and finally it was accepted.
Overall, it's okay, but the speed of the editor's handling of the manuscript is sometimes fast and sometimes slow. The article took six months from submission to acceptance, with half of the time spent in the hands of the editor.

(3) Thank | 浮游

General Journal

(0) Thank | 2341235@qq.com

Review is very strict, the journal paper is also good, mainly published with water conservancy projects soil and water conservation sedimentEngineering hydrology paper 2011 impact factor 1.082

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal homepage URL: http://www.waser.cn/journal/journal-main.asp

(0) Thank | Anonymous