The earliest domestic authors recorded by Web of Science: 1. Jilin University, Qiu, XD et al. 1995; 2. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Liu, Yunhui et al. 1998; 3. Chongqing University, Li, P. et al. 1999; 4. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sun, Dong et al. 1999; 5. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Chu, YX et al. 1999; 6. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Xiong, Caihua et al. 1999; 7. University of Electronic Science and Technology, Fu, Hongguang and Chengdu Institute of Computing Technology, Yang, Lu and Zhang, Jingzhong, 1999; 8. Yanshan University, Huang, Zhen et al. 1999.

(14) Thank | zarathustr

The team of Caihua Xiong, Han Ding, and Youlun Xiong published here in 1999 and it was one of the earliest domestic authorities. See: Xiong, C.-H., Li, Y.-F., Ding, H., …

(4) Thank | zarathustr

Best in the robotics field. There are only a handful of papers from emerging countries published on it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Is it being reviewed again? Or what is the status?

(0) Thank | xx1107

Yes, the first submission was directly accepted by the chief editor, with both reviewers providing some writing suggestions. The chief editor has given a two-week revision period, and it seems like it's heading towards the Associate Editor now. There might be another round of external review.

(0) Thank | kyle-001

Did it get directly conditionally accepted? How are the comments from the reviewers? Do we still need to send it for external review after conditional acceptance?

(0) Thank | xx1107

11.28 Submission
12.02 Under SE Review
12.04 Awaiting AE Assignment
12.04 Under Review
02.03 Conditional Accept

02.14 R1 Revision Submitted
02.16 Under SE Review
02.23 Under Review

(0) Thank | kyle-001

How long does the first-instance trial take?

(0) Thank | xx1107

Brother, are you back? This is taking too long.

(0) Thank | xx1107

Tried submitting on June 27th, went directly under review. It's December 25th today and still under review, a bit slow.

(0) Thank | kai zhou

11.06 has been submitted for review. Is the submission rate high for IJRR?

(0) Thank | 科研民工2024

The major repair was rejected, too strict, why is that?

(0) Thank | 科研民工2024

Got rejected later xdm

(0) Thank | xiaoro

Just trying it out, already submitted on 10.26.

(0) Thank | 科研民工2024

2023.08.31 Submission of initial draft
2023.12.17 Major revision (Two reviewers, one editor, asked about 50 questions, very fair and objective)
2024.01.31 Submission of revised draft (supplemented with experiments, simulations, almost a complete rewrite of the first chapter, experiments section reorganized)
The editor and reviewers are very skilled, their feedback greatly helped the article. Due to the Christmas holiday, an extension was requested for submitting the revised draft

(0) Thank | xiaoro

Is this the big boss? Awesome

(0) Thank | piggy_one

The submission is for a regular issue and has not been published yet

(0) Thank | 北冥有鱼123

Cow, big shot, did you submit a special issue or a regular issue? Share the title for us to learn

(0) Thank | 青蛙爱吃醋

Amo is right

(0) Thank | GuidCon

2023.04.06 Submit initial draft
2023.06.15 Major revision
2023.07.30 Submit revised manuscript
2023.09.04 Conditional acceptance
2023.09.08 Submit revised manuscript
2023.10.01 Acceptance
The efficiency of the editing work is very high, and the review speed is surprisingly fast. The first review took two months, the second review took one month, and with the time for revisions, it took a total of 6 months. The attitudes of the three reviewers were very friendly yet their opinions were sharp, pointing out the crucial points. Through careful preparation in responding to and making revisions to meet the reviewers' opinions and the editor's requirements, it was accepted smoothly

(2) Thank | 北冥有鱼123

Not suitable for those who are impatient for results and beginners, but suitable for those who have accumulated certain knowledge in their academic field and have summarizing academic insights.

(3) Thank | 青蛙爱吃醋

The experts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences are amazing.

(0) Thank | Tony

Unbelievable, completely clueless, it turns out that the goal of our struggle is a third-tier journal.

(0) Thank | xuxuan

Has the Chinese Academy of Sciences appointed experts to review the journal IJRR? It is not in the top three sections, which is truly hilarious.

(149) Thank | 落空

Record: In the upgraded version of the 2021 Chinese Academy of Sciences new division, IJRR has been classified into the third tier. Hahaha, I'm laughing so much that I'm losing my teeth.

(158) Thank | piggy_one