The paper is on the direction of deep learning semantic segmentation. 2020.8.31 Submission. 2020.9.30 First review: a major revision was required. There were two reviewers. The first reviewer raised some conceptual and detailed questions in the article, and the second reviewer raised technical questions and asked to supplement some experiments. The comments of the two reviewers were relatively positive. 2020.11.9 Resubmission. 2020.12.6 Minor revision was required in the second review. However, it was a small issue, so it was submitted on the same day. 2020.12.8 Acceptance. Summary: The review turnaround time is okay, the reviewers have a good attitude, and the editor is also very serious.

(2) Thank | qlxxdgs

The paper has made some new extensions on conventional issues in the field of remote sensing. It was accepted after major revisions and minor revisions. The first review took four months, including 2 months of looking for reviewers. It was sent for the second review after major revision was made, and after reviewed for about one and a half months, a minor revision was required. Then it got accepted in another 10 days. It took a total of more than 6 months for review and revisions. There were many opinions each time (dozens of opinions for major revision). Comments involved professionalism and format, and required high requirements for the scientificity and preciseness. If the article is innovative enough, you can try to submit it to this journal.

(0) Thank | 金龙

2018.05.30–2018.10.31 Submission to first review: major revision. Comments of three reviewers were more reliable; 2018.11.01–2019.01.23 Revision to submission of the revised manuscript: I mainly added two experiments; 2019.01.23–2019.01.26 Submission of the revised manuscript to suggested accepting; 2019.02.27–2019.03.05 Revised the formant of manuscript to final acceptance.

(6) Thank | flopf

Received two expert review opinions. About a year and a half from submission to publication. Relatively easy acceptance.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Hello, I would like to submit to this journal. Should the figures and tables be saved separately? If they are saved separately, should the figure captions and table captions be placed at the end of the paper? Should the figures and tables also be saved in a separate folder? Lastly, which files should be submitted during the submission process?

(0) Thank | gjkl

May I ask if the figures and tables of this journal should be saved separately? If saved separately, should the figure captions and table captions be placed at the end of the paper? Should the figures and tables be saved in separate folders? Also, what files should be submitted when submitting?

(0) Thank | gjkl

Hello, I would like to ask a somewhat bold question regarding the submission process. Should the figures and tables for this journal be saved separately? If they are to be saved separately, should the figure captions and table captions be placed at the end of the paper? Should the figures and tables be saved in separate folders? Also, which files should be submitted when submitting the paper?

(0) Thank | gjkl

Hello, should the figures and tables of the journal be saved separately? If saved separately, should the figure captions and table captions be placed after the paper, and should the figures and tables be saved in separate folders? Also, what files should be submitted when submitting?

(0) Thank | gjkl

Hello, I would like to submit an article to this journal. I would like to inquire about the submission process. Should the figures and tables of the journal be saved separately? If they are saved separately, should the figure captions and table captions be placed at the end of the paper? Should the figures and tables be saved in separate folders? Also, what files should be submitted during the submission process?

(0) Thank | gjkl

It's been two months already, and the reviewer still hasn't been assigned. Sending emails doesn't work either as there is no response. It's useless.

(0) Thank | wddxsy

It has been two weeks since submission, but the status is still showing as "ED: Not Assigned" and "ADM: Not Assigned", indicating that it is still awaiting admin processing. How long is a normal wait time for this stage? Should I send an email to inquire about the status with the journal?

(0) Thank | 1

2024-8-21 submitted
2024-12-18 resubmitted
2025-1-30 major revision
2025-3-4 revision submitted
2025-3-26 accept

(0) Thank | yiwangzhuzu

It has been over a month, and the editor is still selecting and inviting reviewers. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | wddxsy

Hello, may I ask if you are OA or non-OA?

(0) Thank | 猪妹

It's been over twenty days and it still hasn't been submitted for review. Sending emails is useless, if it's not through the OA, it's slow.

(0) Thank | 我的心里住着一个你

Are there any friends who are still awaiting admin processing like me and have not been submitted for review yet?

(0) Thank | 我的心里住着一个你

Submission on August 24, 2024
Major revision on December 3, 2024
Revised on December 26, 2024
Accepted on February 2025
A good journal is one that accepts submissions!

(0) Thank | 伊荑旖昳

Submission in August 2024
Major revision in October 2024
Minor revision in November 2024
Acceptance in January 2025

(0) Thank | Zzxxhh

2025.01.054 - ED: Not Assigned ADM: Not Assigned Awaiting Admin Processing
It has been in the submission status all along, when will it change status?

(0) Thank | jiaojiao5201

2024-6-25 submitted
2024-8-9 major revision
2024-9-20 revision submitted
2024-10-9 accept

(0) Thank | okfine123

Hey, can I ask about submission related matters? Thank you ?

(0) Thank | zzzzmmm

Hey bro, have you submitted your work? I wanted to ask about some things regarding the submission.

(0) Thank | zzzzmmm

I want to ask who has a template, the template he gave is a bit abstract and I can't understand it very well. I don't quite understand it for the first time I submitted it. Thank you, thank you all.

(0) Thank | zzzzmmm

Hello, I would like to ask about the reference citation section. Do I need to turn the year of the cited references into hyperlinks? I noticed that the references cited in the published papers are linked, but those generated by the given LaTeX template are not linked.

(0) Thank | bellohh

I would like to ask about the references section. Do I need to turn the years of the cited references into hyperlinks? I noticed that the references cited in the published papers are already hyperlinked, but the ones generated by the LaTeX template provided do not have hyperlinks.

(0) Thank | bellohh