31-Dec-2019, submission; 09-Feb-2019, major revision; 01-Mar-2020, accept. It is my first SCI article, and it was smooth. The comments given by the two reviewers are critical issues.

(27) Thank | LeoZY

The manuscript was sent for review three days after the submission, required revision two months later, and accepted directly after the revised manuscript was returned. The efficiency is very high.

(2) Thank | 挚爱梧桐

15.05.19 Submission; 30.06.19 Major revision; 02.08.19 Accept.

(8) Thank | Chen H.

Under review for a few months. Uses both foreign and domestic reviewers.

(1) Thank | lleikkai

Submitted on August 5th, received major revisions on October 5th. The third reviewer suggested one minor revision and two major revisions. Returned on November 5th, made minor revisions on December 2nd. Returned again on December 3rd, accepted on December 5th. The submission consisted of the remaining data from another top-tier article published in the second district, without any overlap between the two articles. The journal was very friendly, and I originally thought it would be rejected. Thank you. Keep up the good work, appreciate the data, conduct experiments, and strive to impact the top-tier district.

(0) Thank | 灌水老先生

Reviewed for 5 months, no news~~~

(2) Thank | Pengpeng

2020.10.16 Submission
2021.01.04 Major revision
2021.02.05 Revised
2021.02.07 Accept

The submission was reviewed within three days, followed by a major revision two and a half months later. The opinions of the five reviewers were detailed and their requirements were quite high, resulting in around 70 to 80 suggestions. I made diligent revisions for a month and the acceptance came back quickly. The efficiency was very high. I hope it continues to improve.

(4) Thank | tqy

2018.02.02 Submission2018.05.08 overhaul2018.05.18 repaired back2018.07.03 Receive

(0) Thank | SCU

2016/11/07Submission2016/12/27 rejection or re-submitment2017/1/21 re-submitment2017/5/30 Overhaul2017/6/21 repaired back2017/7/11 overhaulReceived on 2017/7/16.The first SCI article may be related to the poor writing of oneself, and there are always many language problems.But it doesn't matter, as long as the journal gives you the opportunity to submit or modify, you have the opportunity to receive it.

(6) Thank | CSU

reviewer's request is still quite high, but as long as it is modified, it will be accepted.

(5) Thank | 鹏鹏

Review time is very long, I don't know if it is because of the review.The reviewer's opinion is very good.

(3) Thank | 彩虹

Review time is very long, I don't know if it is because of the review.The reviewer's opinion is very good.

(0) Thank | songyu14@lzu.edu.cn

This journal affects shadow instability, 2011 1.9More points, in 2012 directly fell to more than 1.2 points, the decline is too big, the risk of submiting in this journal is too big

(0) Thank | Anonymous

70d gives review comments, received after 6d minor repair.The review speed is normal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous