Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 07.29 Submitted to Journal; 07.31 With Editor; 08.02 With Editor; 08.04 Under Review; 08.08 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.10 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.13 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.18 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.20 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.25 Under Editor Evaluation; 08.27 Revised (There were seven reviewers, all required major revisions, and 20 days were given for revision and supplementing experiments and testing. After communicating with the editor via email, they agreed to extend 20 days); 10.07 Submitted to Revised; 10.08 Under Review; 10.10 Required Reviews Completed; 10.30 Accepted.

(31) Thank | LGCALL

2020.3.29 submitted to journal; 2020.4.2 with editor; 2020.4.5 with editor; 2020.4.27 under review; 2020.5.28 revision (two reviewers, with two minor revisions); 2020.6.5 revision submitted to journal; 2020.6.6 with editor; 2020.6.17 under review; 2020.7.13 revision (one reviewer suggested to accept it directly, and the other one suggested to accept it after updating a few new references and revise a few contents in introduction); 2020.7.15 revision submitted to journal; 2020.7.16 with editor; 2020.7.20 under review (a month later, we sent an email to inquire about the status); 2020.8.27 accept. I don’t know if it’s the cause of the epidemic. The submission cycle is relatively long. This journal requires patience for waiting for the results. Every time when I thought there was no hope, the status was updated suddenly and there was hope again. I had been waiting for five months. Finally, the result was good. Thank you. Hope the journal is getting better and better!

(4) Thank | asdfghjkl

The paper was submitted on December 26th, unfortunately in time for Christmas in the West, the paper has been in the status of “submit to journal”, and it was finally numbered on January 7th. On January 10th it changed to “with editor”. On January 14th, the editor returned the manuscript and let me modify the language and supplement the graphic abstract on January 18th. On January 23rd it was with editor again. On February 27th it finally changed to under review. On March 23rd “required reviewers completed” and the review results (minor revision) returned on the same day. There are three reviewers. One recommended direct acceptance, one recommended acceptance after citing a few references, and one recommended minor revisions, a total of four comments. Fortunately, only some details of the article need revise but no data need supplement. In addition, the editor-in-chief also made some suggestions for careful revision. I returned the revised manuscript on March 26th. On March 28th, because the word count of highlights exceeded limit, machine inspected that and it was returned. I resubmitted it the same day. On March 31st it became with editor. On April 5th, the editor-in-chief sent an email notification of acceptance. It took more than three months, mainly due to the Christmas and the impact of the epidemic in the middle, which delayed a lot of time. Fortunately, the acceptance was smooth. I would like to thank the editor-in-chief for handling the articles in a timely manner, and there was no delay in processing progress due to the epidemic. The friend downstairs whose manuscript is with editor, please be calm. Recently, it is very slow to find reviewers because of the epidemic.

(11) Thank | Kreveng

Fast publishing. The review comments needed to be addressed with experiments and required additional English revision. Requirements for innovation are not very high, but the workload is very strict, mostly large studies. Emphasis is placed on overall performance evaluation and analysis of factors affecting overall catalytic performance. In addition, the journal focuses more on the analysis of the reaction, and does not like the papers with partial materials. One of my review comments is that “the author should strengthen the dynamic analysis of the reaction.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2025/8/8 Under Review Submission 7 received, 3 pending. No reviewers have completed the reviews yet.

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

2025/8/7 Under Review
2025/8/8 Required Reviews Completed

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

2025/07/01 Submitted
2025/07/10 Under review
It has been almost a month since the submission, and one of the reviewers has not provided feedback yet. Can we please speed up the process? It's taking too long.

(0) Thank | Chong

7.9 18/3/1, 7.19 20/3/1, 7.23 rrc, two reviewers provided 14 comments, with a 20-day revision period given, and resubmission due on 8.8.

(0) Thank | Krnkrn

2025/8/6 under review, 7 sent, 2 received, and 1 completed.
2025/8/7 under review, 7 sent, 2 received, and 0 completed.
One reviewer withdrew their comments, it's really annoying... I directly contacted Elsevier customer service to ask...

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

On August 7th, the article was still in the hands of the editor. After inquiring with customer service, they directly stated that it did not fit the theme of the journal and rejected it. Sincerely advise against submitting again, as they are slow and dragging their feet.

(0) Thank | Yongchong Yu

2025/8/6 Revised with editor.

(1) Thank | 在读理工生

Submitted on July 26th
Still in the editor's hands on August 6th
Too slow.

(0) Thank | Yongchong Yu

Not necessarily, mine is a mixed bag, so the third reviewer must determine, and major revisions were requested afterwards.

(0) Thank | 匿名人员..

Under review on 4th August 2025, sending 7, receiving 2.

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

2025/8/1 under review (probably processed in the middle of the night)
2025/8/2 under review, scheduled for delivery on the 7th, received on the 1st

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

Initial review, accepted by 3 reviewers, 2 completed, and 1 still Under Review. Does this mean that someone has rejected the submission? Is it going to be rejected?

(0) Thank | Mwwj

It has been half a month since I submitted my RRC, and there has been no editing done yet.

(0) Thank | 大小姐夫

On the afternoon of August 1, 2025, the status date almost changed, but it still says "with editor," so it should have been assigned to an editor.

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

Still pending review as of 8/1/2025.

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

Did you submit it for review today?

(0) Thank | Yongchong Yu

2025/7/30 with editor has not yet been submitted for review.

(0) Thank | 在读理工生

2025.07.23 Change status to Revise  Modification deadline is 20 days.

(0) Thank | 1.01

Under Review on 2025/07/26.

(0) Thank | DYY_BUCT

Excuse me, is this journal fast?

(0) Thank | Yongchong Yu

2025/7/26 with editor

(0) Thank | 在读理工生