The following is a rejection letter: I have received your paper and submitted it for an initial "summary review" by the Editors. This type of review isConducted on manuscripts submitted to the Journal promptly to determine whether they provide significant, new, and i

(14) Thank | Anonymous

May I ask how long the first review allowed for revisions?

(0) Thank | 暗星

The two reviewers of the first review provided over ten comments. The editor has given one month for revisions. Can anyone tell me how long the first round of revisions usually takes? And is there a high likelihood of rejection in the second review?

(0) Thank | 暗星

I would like to inquire about how to recommend reviewers. Our schedules are similar, but I still can't find the right person.

(0) Thank | lay0924

This journal takes too long to review.

(0) Thank | lay0924

Hello, OP. I am in the same situation. It has been a month and a half since wja. I received a template reply after sending an email, saying "peer review without problem." I want to know what this means. Does it mean that the manuscript has already been sent for external review, but the system has not been updated yet? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 牛牛王子

Submission on 11th May 2024
Out for Review since 17th September 2024, sent an email to urge, editor immediately replied
No reviewers assigned, asked me to recommend reviewers on 18th October 2024
Received a reject and resubmit decision on 8th November 2024
Completed revisions, resubmitted on 12th December 2024
Accepted on 9th January 2025

(0) Thank | 677

Excuse me, has the OP received any news yet? It has been almost two months since I submitted to With editor, but there has been no response. Despite my reminders, I keep receiving the same official template reply. I don't know if there is still any hope...

(0) Thank | Nancy116

Update: With editor 12 days later out for review; 30 days later decision pending along with revision required.

(0) Thank | helloS

10.15 submission
11.13 with editor
11.23 out for review
12.10 minor revision

This journal is considered acceptable in the field of human-computer interaction, but it leans more towards the non-cs part of HCI. Therefore, the reputation of this journal in the technical HCI community is average, and it is even referred to as 'a third-tier journal' by a well-known technical scholar in HCI. So, if you are a friend who wants to focus more on HCI in computer science in the future, be cautious about submitting to this journal. However, friends who are more inclined towards design & art or social computing can give it a try (the acceptance rate is very high).

(0) Thank | DynastyLi

08 November 2024 (1) Manuscript Submitted
08 November 2024 (1) With Journal Administrator

20 November 2024 (2) Manuscript Submitted
20 November 2024 (2) With Journal Administrator

(0) Thank | smallrice45

Submitted for review with editor after 12 days.

(0) Thank | helloS

Still with editor.

(0) Thank | helloS

I am in the same situation as you, waiting for the editor's decision after one month, and now it has been 12 days with no result. Have you heard anything about being out for review? What is your current status?

(0) Thank | AZ..

I am in the same situation as you, one month after "With Editor," and now it has been 12 days with no results. Can we expect it to be "Out for Review"? What is your current situation?

(0) Thank | AZ..

Hello, how did it turn out in the end? Do you have a template available?

(0) Thank | cv-master

The journal administrator updated it to "with editor" after a whole month. Prior to this, an email inquiry revealed that the result was "peer review without any problems."

(0) Thank | helloS

It's been extremely slow, over three months now. I went to check on the progress of the review, only to find out that it has just been submitted for review.

(0) Thank | hervey

Urged, the reply is very template. Thank you for checking your status with us.
I have checked the status of your manuscript within our online submission system and I can confirm that your submission is currently progressing through peer review without any problems.

(0) Thank | 大脑会思考

Overall, the process was very fast, with minor revisions taking two months to complete.

(0) Thank | Accept!

Received, thank you for sharing, I'll wait a little longer. I saw some people on XHS haven't changed in 30 days, even those who submitted on October 1st, still WJA.

(0) Thank | 大脑会思考

I emailed the editor and received a response a few days later: "I have checked the status of your manuscript within our online submission system and I can confirm that your submission is currently progressing through peer review without any problems. However, the system still shows it as 'with administrator'."

(0) Thank | helloS

Until now, there is still nothing. Why did it suddenly slow down?

(0) Thank | 大脑会思考

Has the OP received any updates? It has been over 20 days since my paper with the Administrator.

(0) Thank | helloS

10.22 Still with journal Administrator.

(0) Thank | 大脑会思考