5.2, received; 5.3, with editor; 5.9, under review, Khellil Sefiane; 6.16, required reviews completed; 6.17, minor revision (reviewer 1); 7.8, resubmission; 7.8, with editor; 7.10, minor revision (reviewer 2); 8.6 resubmission; 8.8, under review; 9.7, required reviews completed; 9.20. accept. The level of this journal is very good, it is a Top+ one in new Q1, it is also the authority in the field of heat and mass transfer. The review speed is relatively fast. It took about more than one month for the last article, and it took four months for this article. The reviewers’ comments were very professional. Although two minor revisions were given, I was responsible for the article and added a few experiments to improve the level of the article. It took nearly 50 days for the reply. I hope that a few more articles on heat and mass transfer will be published later.

(6) Thank | 皮卡上的皮卡丘

The manuscript was submitted at the end of April. Three days later, the editor-in-chief said that there are too many authors, and the number of authors was limited. We submitted it on the same day after the revision, and then one week later it was assigned to another editor from the editor-in-chief, where it took another week before it was sent for review on May 10. The comments of the first review returned on June 10, and the three reviewers required minor revisions. It took half a month to revise it, and it was submitted on June 25. It then was sent for review on the same day. After the second review returned on July 19, the first and second reviewers agreed to accept it. The third reviewer still had three questions. After 5 days of revision, I submitted it on July 24 and it was sent for review on the same day. On the morning of August 15, my supervisor called and told me that the article was accepted. I'm really happy. The journal is very fast, and the review comments can usually be returned in about a month. The editor is also very nice. I wish the journal better and better.

(7) Thank | wen123

The manuscript was submitted on April 2nd. The first review was completed on May 2nd. The first review decisions were sent back on May 23th. Four reviewers required major revision with many comments. I was given one month to modify. I didn’t upload my revision until the day before the deadline. I received the second review decisions in a month. Three reviewers had no comments, but the first reviewer put forward a lot of new comments. The editor still required a major revision. The major revision lasted nearly three weeks. After the revision was uploaded, the rejection email was received on September 22th. The first reviewer said that there was a problem with the boundary conditions of one of my models. In the second round of major revision, I had confirmed that this setting had no influence and other papers had the same setting. And I also provided those papers. Unexpectedly, the article was rejected because of this issue. The editor was not friendly. In this case, why the editor didn’t invite a new reviewer. It's a waste of time and energy to make two rounds of major revisions but without acceptance. What a deceptive Journal!

(15) Thank | wen123

Extensive review including grammar and language. 7 months overall. Very efficient editors.

(2) Thank | 妖仙姐姐

Have you submitted your article for review? I have submitted mine almost a month ago and it is still "with editor." This journal is really frustrating.

(0) Thank | 不发GRL不改名

May I ask what the final review comments were and if they were accepted?

(0) Thank | undefined

I am really amused. This journal is no longer in the top list of Chinese Academy of Sciences this year. It's good that it's been cancelled. I suggest everyone to submit to other journals in the future. Manuscripts submitted to this journal are left with the editor for over a month without being sent for review. They don't reply to reminder emails, but instead invite you to review other manuscripts in the system.

(0) Thank | hhhhh1234

Thank you very much, and best wishes for a successful review process.

(0) Thank | niuniuzhong

I revised it according to the suggestions given by the editor for two weeks and submitted it for review. Now, one reviewer has completed the review.

(1) Thank | undefined

Is there a chance for rejected submissions to be resubmitted for review? Is it common for this publication to allow resubmissions of rejected articles?

(0) Thank | niuniuzhong

This is the standard operation of IJHMT, everyone go and submit to ATE, it feels much better to experience submitting a paper.

(0) Thank | Zhou

I suggest submitting to other places instead of resubmitting here. I was told to resubmit my manuscript here, only to be told to submit elsewhere afterwards. Also, it seems like this is a Chinese editor. They don't work during the May 1st holiday and rejected me after just a brief look on May 6th. It's a waste of time, almost a month wasted.

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻—.—

The second round of revisions has arrived. The reviewer who rejected the first draft believes that the method is not feasible and has once again criticized the design of the proposed solution. I don't know how to respond.

(0) Thank | cheng

Last time I resubmitted my rejected article, they asked me to change the format. After resubmitting it a week later, they asked me to submit it elsewhere. This editor is really annoying, wasting my time and emotions. I have decided to blacklist this journal and will never submit to it again. I will replace all the references to their journal that they asked me to cite!

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻—.—

I am like you, still editing in there for 20 days. The editor of this journal is really ****.

(0) Thank | hhhhh1234

Those in a hurry should not submit, as the editing efficiency is too low.

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻—.—

24.12 submission
25.2 major revision
25.4 rework
25.5 rrc request for acceptance

(2) Thank | cheng

Please translate the following passage into English: ...

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻—.—

4.17 WE
4.25 WE
A little slow...

(0) Thank | 嘻嘻—.—

Looking forward to being recorded.

(0) Thank | 爱ky的小罗

How are you doing now? Have you resubmitted for review after the revisions? I encountered a similar situation today and provided 13 comments.

(0) Thank | gc13

There are two reviewers in total, and one of them has been reviewing for almost two months and still hasn't finished... Did they run away? Should I remind them, or have they forgotten about it?

(0) Thank | undefined

This journal likes to reject and resubmit, boost citations, I have also received your opinion before.

(0) Thank | Zhou

2.24 Submitted to/WE
2.26 WE
2.28 Rejected, editor provided 12 suggestions for revision and resubmission.

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj

I have also encountered it, how about you?

(0) Thank | yuanahsjsj