Junk journal, very slow, one year of review, minor revision after major revision, the reviewer agreed to publish, the editor-in-chief said it’s not in line with the direction. Waste a year.

(21) Thank | 农业遥感

Submission on June 17, 2019; July 28, major revision; August 11, revised submission; August 22, sent for review; September 25, minor revision; October 3, acceptance. It was published online around October 14. It was very fast and the efficiency was very high.

(13) Thank | 南海Ocean

I wrote the article about geothermal detection by thermal infrared remote sensing. The review was relatively fast, and the questions were professional. I submitted it on January 10, 2019. It was under review on January 11, 2019; major revision was required on January 27, 2019. (One reviewer had a good opinion, approved of the methods, and gave some professional advices. The other two mainly gave four comments in research, some suggestions on grammar and increasing field verification.) I submitted the revision on March 23, 2019. (It was Chinese New Year, so I revised it slowly. And after all the problems were revised, it took three or four days for the professional proofreading.) I was informed of acceptance on March 26, 2019.

(45) Thank | akang

2 month review, 2 reviewers, and high comment quality.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

What's the situation now, brother?

(0) Thank | Lianghj113

2025.08.04 Submission
2025.08.07 Under review
2025.08.10 Accepted for review by two reviewers

(0) Thank | deng Hua

Before, the paper was rejected due to the inability to find reviewers. After making many changes and submitting to RSE, it was rejected and then resubmitted to JAG. 
7.26 resubmitted to JAG
7.29 rejected, plagiarism rate greater than 13, word count greater than 8000, need to cite JAG literature
7.29 resubmitted after revisions
8.1 under review

(0) Thank | 粽子先生

Have you re-applied after being rejected?

(0) Thank | Sha Zhao

Brother, how many people have accepted the review?

(0) Thank | 水上行

There have been no changes to the RRC as of today, 6.5.

(0) Thank | 弓长ww

7.9 Resubmission indicates willingness to wait...only to be rejected directly.

(0) Thank | 粽子先生

I am also at the same time point as you with WD, and I can't find any reviewers either. I feel like it's about to be returned to me soon.

(0) Thank | 水上行

7.5 If reviewers' suggestions cannot be found, consider transferring the submission to another journal.

(0) Thank | 粽子先生

5.26 Major repair return
6.18 Minor repair return
7.7 Accept

(1) Thank | 阿呆斯基upp

Brother, have you voted?

(0) Thank | ZZZKKKKAAAAAA

4.18 Submit to journal
4.20 with editor
4.23 Under Review

(0) Thank | 粽子先生

The format review said that the duplication rate exceeds 23%. How much does the duplication rate of JAG need to be reduced to? It seems that this requirement is not mentioned on the official website. After being rejected, can the submission be resubmitted after the duplication rate is reduced?

(0) Thank | pppkk

This is too slow. Submitted on 6.10, still with editor on 6.19, it's been a month for the initial review now?

(0) Thank | pppkk

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 8000 characters excluding line numbers, a slight exceedance should be fine as well.

(0) Thank | 水上行

Hello, what is the required repetition rate for this journal? Is the limit of 8000 words including line numbers?

(0) Thank | pppkk

It seems that you have been waiting for a while. My paper is under review, but no one has accepted to review it yet. I have updated the status several times and invited reviewers again, but so far, there are still no takers. I'm not sure if the topic is too niche or if reviewers are just too busy during graduation season.

(0) Thank | 水上行

I have been waiting for two months with the editor, but there has been no progress. Even after pushing for updates, there has been no response. Have you taken any further steps now?

(0) Thank | zhou xiangbei

I am sorry, but "包真" does not have a direct translation in English as it is not a complete sentence or phrase. Can you provide more context or clarification so I can better assist you in translating it?

(0) Thank | Accepted-520

One year? Is that for real? Isn't that an exaggeration?

(0) Thank | 树熊

I have been waiting for a year and still haven't received the initial review, feeling very anxious.

(0) Thank | Accepted-520