The first comments were returned in more than 8 months. If I submit the article in my third year of master, then the examination and graduation of doctoral degree will be far away and not within the foreseeable future. Time cost is too high, I hope you will be cautious! To be honest, the opinions returned were quite pertinent.

(4) Thank | 鸣凡11

Several reminders were sent during first review of 9 months. There was one reviewer who made 7 or 8 comments. The revised manuscript was uploaded three months ago but they still hadn't had any news. It felt like the journal editors reviewed manuscripts only when they thought of it!

(40) Thank | SB期刊

06 May 2019 manuscript submitted; 20 June 2019 with editor. Reviewers assigning was slow.

(6) Thank | channingNJ

A medium-level journal belonging to the engineering technology industry. The impact factor is low, but the amount of acceptance is relatively large, easy to publish. Review speed: General, 3-8 weeks.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My schedule and availability are similar to yours, but we have only invited 4 reviewers at this time.

(0) Thank | 冰山一角

No one has accepted the review yet.

(0) Thank | 冰山一角

Has the situation changed now? It has been 20 days for me.

(0) Thank | 冰山一角

5.28 稿件已提交
5.29 由编辑处理
6.12 审稿中 0/0/7
6.12 审稿中 0/0/7

Translation:
5.28 Manuscript Submitted
5.29 With Editor
6.12 Under Review 0/0/7
6.12 Under Review 0/0/7

(0) Thank | 蜗杆分度圆直径

Have you received it?

(0) Thank | Oops

It seems like author confirmation is not necessary.

(0) Thank | Lfyuans

Last night we had a meeting with the editor.

(0) Thank | Oops

Roughly about a week, the author confirmed that I also do not know what the process is.

(0) Thank | 冰山一角

I am too, it has been 10 days since the paper was submitted and it is still in "submitted" status. I wonder if the editor has not been working on it during this time. How long does it usually take to become "with editor"? Is it necessary for the author to confirm before proceeding further?

(0) Thank | Oops

It has been in "with editor" status for 10 days, is this normal?

(0) Thank | 冰山一角

May I ask what is the maximum deadline for the second revision of this journal? It has been almost a month and neither of the two reviewers has reviewed it yet.

(0) Thank | 0005

Have your co-authors confirmed this paper? It seems necessary.

(0) Thank | spiderweb

Have your co-authors confirmed this paper?

(0) Thank | spiderweb

Submitted on May 6th, Under Review on May 12th, 9 reviewers were invited, 6 agreed to review, and one opinion was received on the 13th, followed by a second opinion on the 16th. The status changed to RRC. Opinions were returned on the 21st and 28th. Received an email on June 3rd for major revisions. One suggestion for direct publication, and a total of 33 opinions from 3 experts, with a one-month revision period.

(0) Thank | HaoLiu

Yes, just like you, all opinions need to be revised. Keep going!

(0) Thank | Lfyuans

In that case, the opinions of 6 experts are too many to be revised... I see that I have already revised 4 opinions, but in the system it still shows UR. However, when I revised 2 opinions in the link and WeChat, it changed to RRC. But the editor has not processed it yet. Now it turns out that at least 4 expert opinions need to be revised, which is frustrating.

(0) Thank | HaoLiu

Generally, all opinions will be given to you.

(0) Thank | Lfyuans

Hello, what I mean is, have the editor sent all 6 reviewers' comments for you to revise, or have they only selected two or three of them?

(0) Thank | HaoLiu

Six reviewers provided feedback.

(0) Thank | Lfyuans

Finally, a few reviewers.

(0) Thank | HaoLiu

2025-2-28: we
2025-3-18: UR 0-0-12
2025-3-20: UR 0-1-12
2025-3-31: UR 1-1-12
2025-5-3: UR 1-1-21

(0) Thank | Paper_muggle