Relatively fast and reasonable reviews.

(1) Thank | NicholasWu

After several months of review, only one reviewer was found, who provided relatively positive feedback. The paper was revised twice. However, it is intimidating to receive emails from the journal with the opening sentence "We regret to inform you" every time.

(0) Thank | 笑书神侠

Accuracy: The abstract should accurately reflect the purpose and content of the paper; Independence: The abstract should stand alone, so explanations should be provided for special terms, all abbreviations (except measurement units), and acronyms; Concise and specific: Each sentence in the abstract should provide as much information as possible, while being concise; Tense and voice: Abstracts generally use present tense and simple past tense, and passive voice is often used to describe facts

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Be structured, accurate, concise, highlight key points, and present complex ideas in an easy-to-understand manner. Use short sentences as much as possible to avoid ambiguity in semantics, but avoid repetition

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What are the key points to writing an abstract?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

What are the general requirements for an abstract?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Success Rate: 75.0
Experience Sharing: After submitting for two months, I received the first round of reviews. It has been two weeks since I received the comments, but there is still no update. Even though the final outcome is uncertain, both the editor and the reviewers have acknowledged my research work. Overall, I consider the process relatively fast

(0) Thank | 香风寻山

Crossing the threshold by one point, may the gods bless us! Let's aim for over two points next year

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁