It took about a month to review the manuscript. Three reviewers raised many questions. Because there was no way to supplement data for the beginning of the epidemic at the beginning of the year, we applied for an extension, and the editor extended it for two months. Finally, it was successfully accepted. The editor was very responsible, and many problems were pointed out in the second review.

(0) Thank | 魏伟安

Review process was a bit disjointed and inefficient.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Is there anything slower than this speed?

(0) Thank | @会飞的鱼

2024.07.30 submit to journal - with editor
2024.08.01 under review
2024.08.27 under review invite new reviewers
2024.09.3 required reviews completed 3/4 reviewers
2024.09.12 major revision immediately after being urged for revision
2024.09.25 submit revision - with editor - under review
2023.10.09 accepted
Special thanks to the special issue editor Mirto Mozzon for handling the process quickly, responding promptly, and keeping the time delays on the reviewers.

(0) Thank | --..--

2023.07.08 Submit to journal
2023.07.09 Under Review
2023.08.12 Required Reviews Completed
2023.08.14 Major Revision 
2023.08.30 Submit Revision
2023.08.31 Under Review
2023.10.02 Required Reviews Completed
2023.10.09 Minor Revision 
2023.10.13 Submit Revision
2023.10.13 With Editor
2023.10.15 Accepted

(1) Thank | 小机灵鬼儿

Sent to the editor in India, it took forever. Submitted on May 13th, took over half a month to review. Got feedback at the end of June, returned on July 20th, and waited another half a month to reach the reviewer. Still in review now

(0) Thank | Palm

7.26提交 - Submitted on July 26th
10.10接收 - Received on October 10th

(0) Thank | 贤儿

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for you to process the revised manuscript after I submit it?

(0) Thank | 朱古栗

What else do you want, a bicycle?

(0) Thank | 石头山上

I have submitted twice to ICA, and both times my papers were accepted. The editors provided prompt feedback and the reviewers were also decent. In my opinion, my articles were of good quality among the papers in the third tier.

(0) Thank | 四十英尺

Two reviewers, the problem is very professional and meticulous.Seriously revised, accepted after answering all questions, recommended

(0) Thank | zt

is actually very fast. I received the comments of Xiaoxiu 33 days after submitting the manuscript. It took four days to modify and then return the manuscript., directly accepted the third day after the manuscript.

(2) Thank | 大漠苍狼

Jun12, 2016 Submitted to JournalJun14, 2016 Under ReviewJul13, 2016 ReviseAug11, 2016 Completed acceptFrom submission to final reception for just 2 months, the review was very strict. Three reviewers answered the questions of the reviewers one by one and directly received them. Editor-in-Chief Jeremy M. Smith was super nice, but now it is already Zone 4.The journal hopes to receive more articles and return to the 3rd district.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

was acceptd less than two months after submission, a very good journal.

(1) Thank | 风铃儿

reviewing about 10 days, replying to comments, revisions, or very fast ah

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2013.01.07 contribution, 3013.03.07 received, 3013.03.14 network open.Faster speed!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is now in Zone 4, and Dalton has become Zone 3.Very good in

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Luck is better, from the time of submitment to receiving 2 months, the intermediate modification time is more than 2 weeks, Smith is very nice, directly received the next day after modification, very goodThree district journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

this journal is too slow now, I selectd in March this year, let in MayRepair, soon retired, no news in mid-June.Very anxious

(0) Thank | Anonymous

journal is good, which process is very slow!From submission to recruitment, it is close to one year!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /504086/description

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is a bit slow, justIn one of the articles, it was only after 4 months that I changed the letter and received it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is too slow. I don't know why. I selectd for six months before I gave the comments to be revised. After I revised it, I will give the reviewer two months later and say that there is a little problem and continue to modify.After submiting for a month and a half, there was no news, and I was waiting for an emergency.It is strongly recommended to increase efficiency.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has two similar crystal structures, plus the related properties, the possibility is relatively large

(0) Thank | Anonymous

medium journal, do a little more specific detailsIt's easy to accept.

(0) Thank | Anonymous