4.20, submission; 5.14, minor revision; 6.1, the revised manuscript was submitted; 6.5, minor revision for the format; 6.8, accept. Thank you very much, editor B.C. and reviewers. Very excellent!

(4) Thank | 夜神月

The manuscript was submitted in December last year. One recommended acceptance, one recommended minor revisions. One recommended major revisions and acceptance after the major revision. The editor was very responsible and conscientious. The repetition rate was a bit high, and some sentences were modified and repetition rate was reduced. When typesetting, every word and punctuation were marked for verification.

(0) Thank | Casper-lei

Submitted on January 12th. The results received around February 5th, requiring three minor revisions. We revised it back in three weeks, and it got accepted 18 days later. The editor is very responsible, and the changes in language are very big. Thanks to the editor, there were some minor problems in the proof stage, but it was finally accepted and will be published online on April 5.

(5) Thank | lnlong8891

I am doing research on inorganic new compounds. Three reviewers raised more than 20 large and small questions. In general, the ACS Inorganic Chemistry review is very strict, the formatting is very strict, and the questions raised are also very critical.

(2) Thank | zhuyang

In the field of organometallic chemistry, for the first time, an IC was submitted and assigned the number 40000+. 
25.09.01 Supervisor submitted the paper.
25.09.02 Editorial review, assigned to Professor Christopher Cummins.

(0) Thank | Axiaaaaa

Could you please clarify if he will assign a number to all the articles together, or if he will label each direction with a different letter?

(0) Thank | 超爱操人

Brother, which editor are you?

(0) Thank | 超爱操人

This is a very good journal, it is also a natural index journal. Although there are now a bunch of knockoff versions of inorganic chemistry journals, such as IC communication, IC Front, it is unclear why the Chinese Academy of Sciences classification would place this classic journal in the second tier, while smaller journals are in the first tier. This way, the Chinese Academy of Sciences classification will become less and less authoritative.

(0) Thank | Klose

2025.04.14 Submission
2025.04.15 Reviewed by editor Prof. Jochen Autschbach
2025.04.28 Under peer review
2025.05.13 Revision
2025.06.02 Revision submitted 3 positive 1 negative
2025.06.19 Revision
2025.07.11 Revision submitted
2025.07.15 Revision revised for formatting
2025.07.15 Revision submitted
2025.07.16 Accepted

(0) Thank | 浙大玉泉

Indeed, I submitted an article to Brandi before, and the editor was very kind. I basically made revisions according to the reviewer's comments and adjusted the format, and the article was accepted.

(0) Thank | 沅芷

Hello, which editor have you been assigned to?

(0) Thank | 樊仲皮

In the end, it was also this editor.

(0) Thank | 樊仲皮

Thank you very much Professor Brandi Cossairt for your prompt handling and for making some formatting changes and adding experimental safety statements as requested by the editor. The manuscript was accepted immediately. The process took a total of two months. Best wishes for Brandi Cossairt's smooth work and improving health and beauty! Here's to the continuous improvement of inorganic chemistry!

(0) Thank | 冰美式

3.5 submission
3.31 Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one rejection, editor requested major revision, one month
4.23 It has been over a month since the revision and there has been no progress.

(0) Thank | 寐语者

The editors and reviewers have excellent attitudes and provide very insightful feedback, which is constructive in improving the quality of the article.

(0) Thank | 听秋

20250217 submit
20250308 major revision
20250314 revised
20250404 accept

(0) Thank | accept100

Excuse me, how can I tell if it has been submitted for review? I am also the editor for this. I received the email assigning me as the editor today.

(0) Thank | Francis

Excuse me, how's it going? Are you fast? I am also an editor.

(0) Thank | 11

24.9.8 Submission, received by editor the next day (Brandi Cossairt)
24.9.12 Under review
24.9.30 Major revision (one minor revision, one major revision, one rejection; editor gave 30 days; received feedback the day before National Day and was very upset)
24.10.28 Revised
24.11.25 Minor revision of formatting accepted directly (editor gave two weeks)
24.12.4 Revised (too lazy to make changes while on vacation)
24.12.6 Accepted

Recently, this journal requires an experimental safety statement. At first, I didn't understand what it was about; later I found out that the safety statement is simply a brief mention of possible risks of drugs, operations, and methods before the experimental procedures, typically in 3-5 lines.

(0) Thank | 沅芷

Submission on October 6, 2024.
Review on October 9, 2024.
Minor revisions on October 21, 2024. All three reviewers requested minor revisions.
Revised manuscript returned on November 11, 2024.
Accepted on November 13, 2024.
The whole process took 38 days in total. The speed was really fast, mainly because I took too long to make the revisions myself. If I had been quicker, it wouldn't have taken a month.

(0) Thank | BestLuuuuu

Has anyone met the editor Partha Sarathi Mukherjee? How is he? Is he fast?

(0) Thank | Nuyoah-qqqq

How to view the process? Do you know if it has been submitted for approval?

(0) Thank | 千寻x

9.3 Submit
9.4 with editor
9.5 Under review
9.30 Minor revisions
10.9 Revise
10.12 Accept
10.15 Proofreading
10.17 Online
Really fast turnaround
Thanks to editor P. Shiv Halasyamani

(0) Thank | 波啊

Could you please ask if Prof. Jochen Autschbach is fast in editing and processing? It has been a week and there has been no response.

(0) Thank | 三重芳香

10.04 proof ready for review
First time submitting to ACS, the feeling is too professional. The editors made many adjustments to the language issues in the article in this process, making the article more in line with localization expression, which is great.

(0) Thank | 荷戟执子手