Received 15 August 2015; Revised 18 February 2016; Accepted 18 March 2016; Available online 25 March 2016.

(0) Thank | 河南省委

Direct employment after major repairs, with fast review speed and constructive suggestions.

(0) Thank | 羊岸上的旗

A research article is the main type of research papers published in journals, usually with longer length and larger amount of research data

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

In general, the size and length of the article are used to judge the research results

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What does the term "research article" mean?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

How to determine the type of SCI article?

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

How much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | 气甲松雪

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0 Experience sharing: Veterinary related research paper, submitted on April 6, 2021, revised on June 21, minor revision, revised on July 1, accepted on July 16

(0) Thank | 明智小公主

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese

(0) Thank | 明煦少女

Do you have to choose the reviewers yourself when submitting an article?

(0) Thank | 安德烈亚伍利

Can diabetes foot ulcer be published?

(0) Thank | 安德烈亚伍利

Diabetic foot ulcer, genes can be targeted

meimie 2016-06-30 16:10:00 posted: Nearly 4 months of review, too slow, two reviewers, one suggested publication, one praised the article as well written, then said the conclusions were not novel enough and rejected it. Heartbroken, waited so long in vain

(0) Thank | 安德烈亚伍利

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: I was hit in the past, and got 3 points back then. 2015 2.591 2016 2.885 2017 2.545 2018 2.611

(0) Thank | 日月小菊

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: One month for the first review, with two reviewers. Major revisions were required, and one month was given for revisions. The second review took half a month, with both reviewers from the first review agreeing to accept the paper. However, a third reviewer was requested, leading to another month for major revisions. The paper was revised within half a month and accepted by the editor in one day. It was online within 5 days, with no page charges. Overall, the efficiency was relatively high

(0) Thank | 北国斯伯

Received 15 August 2015, revised 18 February 2016, accepted 18 March 2016, available online 25 March 2016

(0) Thank | 明冠岚翠

Review Speed: 3.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted on 10th October 2017, received first major revision three weeks later. Experiment was added on 12th March and revised. Second major revision two weeks later on 15th December, returned for revision on 18th December. Third revision on 5th January 2018 (continued major revision), revised on 21st January 2018. Accepted on 29th January 2018. Overall, it was faster than I expected. Hope this is helpful to everyone

(0) Thank | 努力啊大雨华

Submission to acceptance took 2 months: received major revisions notice around 3 weeks after submission, spent a month on revisions, and accepted a week after resubmission

(0) Thank | 天欣baby

Everything can only hope for next year, after all, there is no need to worry if the overall trend is up. Even if it only rises a little bit in a year, it will accumulate over time, which is also good

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: It took nearly 4 months for the review process, too slow. Two reviewers, one suggested publication and the other praised the writing of the article at first, but later said the conclusion was not innovative enough and rejected it. It's heartbreaking, waited for so long in vain

(0) Thank | 宗室倩丽

Three reviewers, one says accept, one says revise, one says reject. And then it gets rejected

(0) Thank | 巴蜀又曼

Three reviewers, one said yes, one said revise, and one said reject. And then it got rejected

(0) Thank | 巴蜀又曼

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: Got one article accepted. 3 reviewers. Review completed in April. Conclusion: Patience pays off

(0) Thank | 江南香卉

Two months after submitting the manuscript, the reviewer feedback came back. There were three reviewers, two recommended minor revisions, and one recommended rejection. The editor decided to reject it

(0) Thank | 中原平凡

It has been exactly one month since yesterday, and the time for the "under review" status has changed a bit. I'm nervous, but still hoping for the best

(0) Thank | 中原平凡

I have been back for a month and a half and still no news. So slow

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁