The journal has a good reputation in the industry. Although the impact factor was a little bit low, it is stable in the top of Q1. It took three months from submission to acceptance, which was still quite fast. I hope this journal gets better and better, and everyone will cite more. Submitted to journal, Jun 11 2020; With editor, Jun 12 2020; Revision not ready for peer review, Jun 16 2020; Revision submitted to journal, Jun 16 2020; With editor, Jun 17 2020; Under review, Jun 24 2020; Under review, Jul 15 2020; Major revision, Jul 23 2020; Submitted to journal, Aug 17 2020; With editor, Aug. 18, 2020; Under review Aug. 20, 2020; Acceptance, Sep. 03 2020.

(3) Thank | 木易1

The review is still very fast. 2020.2.1 first submission; 2020.2.3 R1 (some parts of the figures did not meet the requirements); 2020.2.4 second submission; 2020.2.6 R2 (it was still the problem of the figures. The first time there was a problem with the legend, the second time the figures were not clear. Each figure has a dpi of 1200, and the figure was uploaded separately. However, after the system merged them into PDF, they were not clear and the problem cannot be resolved. We explained the situation to the editor and then it was resubmitted and the status became “review”); 2020.2.8 Under Review; 2020.4.8 Minor Revision was required (and three weeks were given); 2020.4.28 R3 was submitted; 2020.5.1 Accept. It went smoothly. Although the editor required a minor revision, I treated it as a major revision and almost all of them were revised. In addition: I would like to ask you how to solve the problem of unclear figures in the PDF generated by the system after they are submitted separately? (I have also encountered the situation before.)

(8) Thank | Coulee

Submission in early October 2019; major revisions in Mid-February, submission on March 5, 2020; minor revisions on March 26, 2020; acceptance on April 1, 2020. “with editor” lasted a long time, 3–4 months. Major revision. Four reviewers raised nearly 20 questions. Fortunately, the problems were concentrated in the preface and the reference parts, and the required supplementary experiments can be explained, and there was no need to supplement experiments. It was very difficult to submit a paper for the first time. This paper had been submitted before and was rejected. Later, the experiment was supplemented according to the opinion of a reviewer. It was resubmitted. It took 2 years. Fortunately, it was recorded and I can graduate!

(2) Thank | 绚石头

A little long, but the editor and reviewers were very sincere, patient and fair.

(10) Thank | zhaohuajun1210@126.com

No way.

(0) Thank | 额尔古纳

Will the major repair be reviewed a second time?

(0) Thank | w222

The major repair does not include a second review before submission.

(0) Thank | w222

Still no movement, it has been 78 days.

(0) Thank | 咸菜36

How is the situation now?

(0) Thank | LFX369

The editor who received the submission is from Aisville, not from the journal's editorial team. It is possible that they are overwhelmed by the large volume of submissions.

(0) Thank | jiangz~y

Strange, my situation is the same. Two weeks after submitting my manuscript, it showed as "RRC" and has been stuck like that since April 15th. Are submissions to other journals not welcomed?

(0) Thank | 小心o

The case has been solved. It is possible that the review comments are inconsistent. My paper was also with RRC for a month and a half, and it may be rejected or require major revisions. After the revisions, it may also need to be submitted to another journal.

(0) Thank | jiangz~y

Yes, it has been transferred to another journal.

(0) Thank | 咸菜36

Is it true that Esweil has transferred over?

(0) Thank | jiangz~y

It has been over two months since the external audit was sent out, and RRC has also been over fifty days, but there is still no news. >-

(0) Thank | 咸菜36

The submission is under review, but it has been sent to over 10 experts and none of them have accepted to review it. What should I do?

(0) Thank | dangligedang~

I am also in the second round of revisions. It has been a month since the revisions, and there is still an expert who has only received the revised manuscript but has not made any progress. It's urgent and frustrating.

(0) Thank | 李洋

5.18 minor revisions
5.22 accepted
Efficiency is very high, hoping the impact factor can reach 6 in the future.

(0) Thank | luoyongjian

I have reviewed this journal three times, and the review time is generally 14 days. However, it also depends on the speed of the reviewers. If the review time is exceeded, the reviewers will not be automatically reminded, and it depends on the efficiency of the editors in handling the manuscripts.

(0) Thank | kobe22

Which editor?

(0) Thank | azy1112

How is this editor, E. Johansson, PhD, guys?

(0) Thank | azy1112

Submitted in late October 2024, the submission was heavily revised that same month due to high similarity rates and some content and formatting issues. It was resubmitted on October 30th and entered the review stage on November 7th. The long wait began, and on May 12th, 2025, it was rejected. It is truly difficult to accept the result of rejection after six months of review. All the effort was in vain.

(1) Thank | 相忘于江湖

May I ask what is the status of the system after the major revision returns? I have always been "With editor" when I return for revisions.

(0) Thank | 卷~

Industrial Crops and Products
2025.2.16 Submitted
2.18 With Editor
2.19 Revise
2.23 Resubmitted
2.24 With Editor
3.15 Under Review (1)
3.16 Under Review (2)
3.17 Under Review (5)
3.19 Under Review (6)
3.23 Under Review (7, 1st review)
3.23 RRC (2nd review)
3.25 RRC (3rd review)
3.26 RRC (4th review)
3.28 RRC (5th review)
4.1 Rejected (2 agreed to revise, 1 neutral, 2 requested additional experiments, editor rejected)

(0) Thank | 梦里花香

Submitted on April 1, 2025
Weight reduction and modification of reference format required by April 4, 2025
Revised on the same day, April 4, 2025
Review completed on April 18, 2025 (major revisions took 10 days)
Revision returned on April 28, 2025 (awaiting response)

(0) Thank | luoyongjian