I just reviewed the manuscript for this journal, and I feel that the requirements are not high. A total of two reviewers are needed, the author just answered the questions raised by the reviewers, and the article was accepted directly.

(0) Thank | yjm1979

Find a new reviewer.

(0) Thank | 娴萝卜

There is still no progress at the moment.

(0) Thank | 娴萝卜

I have been waiting for 4 months. After the major revisions, two out of three original reviewers have not accepted the revised manuscript. One reviewer has already completed the review for almost two months, and now we are looking for another reviewer again...

(0) Thank | 娴萝卜

Post-comparison refers to setting up additional groups based on the characteristics of the data after the data collection is complete, proposing research hypotheses, and conducting statistical analysis; it is to test non-research hypotheses and further explore the results

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Post hoc comparisons are tests of non-research hypotheses. This is very common in actual research: I have completed the experiment, confirmed the hypothesis, but still need to extend the research, so I need to continue exploring the data to see which direction will yield valuable conclusions. At this point, it is as if I am testing all possible comparisons (although in reality it is not possible to exhaust all comparisons, but since there is no specific purpose, all comparisons are potential possibilities). Because comparisons do not only refer to the difference in mean values of two treatments, the linear combinations of multiple treatments are also comparisons

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is post-hoc testing?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

Why should we conduct a post-inspection?

(0) Thank | Darlene Pepys

Just finished reviewing this article for the magazine, the requirements don't seem very strict. Two reviewers are needed in total, and the author readily accepted the questions raised by the reviewers

(0) Thank | Mabel Hewlett

First trial took half a year, Xiao Xiuxiu came back, second trial only took one month, everyone can refer to this speed. During this period, I asked countless times, and could only communicate through customer service

(0) Thank | Rod Christ

Stay calm, I have asked them, this situation can be submitted to other magazines, the letters we sent are evidence

(0) Thank | 寒阴癸巳

Any news? Recently, no one has replied to the withdrawal letter. Also, the withdrawal has not been processed. Can I submit to another journal?

(0) Thank | 寒阴癸巳

I have never received a reply from the editor-in-chief. I have contacted customer service several times, and the latest reply from customer service said that the status and review comments have been received, but I don't know why the editor has not processed them. I now have a detail: this journal has not accepted any papers since March 20th. The "article in press" section has not been updated. What is happening with this journal?

(0) Thank | Rod Christ

Feeling like being on a thief ship, it's been over five months of external review, with three reminders in between, two withdrawals, and the responses, although polite, still do not withdraw the paper. They say the external reviewers have not provided feedback yet, really embarrassing A*V*

(0) Thank | 寒阴癸巳

Okay, how long have you been waiting for external review? Withdraw the submission if it doesn't work out

(0) Thank | 寒阴癸巳

I want to ask if anyone has submitted articles to this magazine before. It's been over four months and I haven't received any response from the external reviewers

(0) Thank | 寒阴癸巳

It has been nearly three months and it is still under review. It is not recommended to invest if you are in a hurry

(0) Thank | 金宇小哥哥

wangjs, this person is so annoying

(0) Thank | 金宇小哥哥

It has been three months since I submitted my manuscript and the status is still under review. After several rounds of email inquiries (I found that this journal can only be contacted through customer service), the editor finally replied to me. Surprisingly, they said that all the reviewers I recommended have declined to review. They asked me to recommend again... Have they not been able to find suitable reviewers for me in these three months? Oh, one misstep

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Fellow wanderers in the same world

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Why is it taking so long for the under review process, it has been over two months now

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

It has been three months with my editor, dizzy

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

So slow, it's been a month and still with editor, sigh, I don't want to say anymore! Sob sob sob sob sob, seeking advice from anyone who has submitted this

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Not too difficult, the experiment is quite comprehensive, as long as it can explain a problem, it should be acceptable!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

One of the reviewers, who was not a native English speaker, rejected my submission, while the other reviewer had no objections. The editor ultimately rejected it. Now I am resubmitting to this journal, hoping to encounter two rational reviewers! Bless!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁