The impact factor of IET RPG is much higher than that of IET Power Electronics and IET GTD, and it should be considered the most influential journal of IET in the power field, which is much difficult to be accepted, with at least 5 reviewers for the first review. The current manuscript processing speed of IET RPG has been improved.

(9) Thank | 电气小博223

Five reviewers for the first review and 3 reviewers for the second review. The experts in the second review are not the same as the firs round, and it is not easy to get accepted. Unlike many journals with few reviewers, it is easy to take advantage of it. The demanding is quite high. 17-08-2018, submitted; 08-12-2018, first review revision; 15-01-2019, major revision; 22-02-2019, minor revision; 20-03-2019, accepted.

(1) Thank | 香独秀2

2018.05.28 Submission2018.10.31 Returned in the first instance, re-submited after the change, gave 90 days, equivalent to overhaul2018.12.16 Revised and re-submited in the editorial department2019.02.06 Second review returned, minor repair, provisionally accepted2019.02.09 minor repair return2019.02.19 receivingIn the meantime, on October 16th, 2018, I urged it once. I want to see the expert opinions in advance. On the day of the editor's reply, I can't give me expert advice before returning all the reviewers' opinions.After half a month, the expert opinion returned.In fact, the expert opinion is not bad, even after a change was accepted, but the editor saw the "in order to" separately when looking at the expert opinions, saying that my reference documents were not quoted in order, and gave a re-submitment after the change.At that time, I was very depressed, but after all, I still had the opportunity and the temperament. I added more than 800 experimental results and returned to wait for results. In less than two months, provisionally accepted, minor repair, and then successfully accepted.The second SCI in life, happy ~

(1) Thank | 青羽

2018.05.28 Submission; 2018.10.31 The first review comments were returned, requiring resubmission after revision. 90 days was given. This is equivalent to a major revision. 2018.12.16 Resubmission after the revision; 2019.02.06. The second review comments returned for provisionally accept, but required minor revision; 2019.02.09 submitted after minor revision; 2019.02.19 Accepted. During the period, I urged it on October 16, 2018, hoping to read the reviewer’s opinions in advance. But the editor replied that they could not give me expert opinions before all the reviewers’ comments returned. Reviewers’ opinions returned after half a month. In fact, the opinions are not bad, and there is even one suggesting accept after revision. But the editor might make a mistake with the reviewers’ opinions and read the "in order to" separately, and said that my references were not cited in order and requiring resubmission after revision. It was kind of depressing at that time, but after thinking about it, there is still a chance for me. And out of anger, I added more than 800 experimental results and returned to wait for the decision. In less than two months, it was provisionally accepted. Then got accepted successfully after minor revisions. The second SCI paper in my life, happy~

(6) Thank | 青羽

Come on, submit a high-end journal.

(0) Thank | kekeshijie

6.10 submitted to the journal
6.11 with editor
6.21 under review 5-6-1//
6.23 under review 7-2-9//
6.26 under review 0-7-6//
The group should be a little insightful, this is nothing, it happens to everyone.

(0) Thank | kekeshijie

After accepting the offer, I have not received the payment email yet. I would like to ask what the next steps are. OP, have you received any follow-up?

(0) Thank | 好风凭借力123

Have any friends here ever published in this journal? It's been 2 and a half months since my article was accepted and I haven't received any follow-up emails regarding copyright or payment. The status on the official website still shows "complete final file updates". When I email the admissions department for inquiries, all I get are template responses. Does anyone know what to do in this situation?

(0) Thank | fightingY123

It's too trashy, a waste of time and energy. I would not recommend this journal to anyone. One reviewer said the manuscript was good, and I made changes according to the second reviewer's request, but it still got rejected. Shocked me for a hundred years, what was Associate Editor Chua KJ thinking! Speechless! I will never submit to IET again!

(0) Thank | 你鼓捣啥

May I ask who your 'de' is?

(0) Thank | fightingY123

The reviewers are not professional at all. Do they actually understand the algorithm research in this field? The associate editor followed the opinions of the reviewers. One of the reviewers had no comments, and the associate editor also had no comments. The paper was rejected simply because the other reviewer's shallow and superficial comments were not thoroughly understood. This is a trash journal.

(0) Thank | 你鼓捣啥

Have the results of your pending decision been released?

(0) Thank | fightingY123

How long did it take for your submission to be under review?

(0) Thank | fightingY123

How long did it take for your application to be under review?

(0) Thank | fightingY123

2023.10.28 submitted
10.28-2024.1.07 under review
2024.1.08 pending decision
2024.3.20 still pending decision
3. 30 first trial ending (minor revisions)
4.10 submitted for first trial
5.15 It's been a month and still no assigned editor or reviewer, this journal is really terrible
5.21 Finally assigned under review

(0) Thank | Todd_chen

Where should I remind you to submit the manuscript?

(0) Thank | WTPV

Did you directly send DE to ask about your pending editor?

(0) Thank | seuyyds

May I ask how much is the layout fee?

(0) Thank | 一颗菠菜

23.03 Consultation on manuscript status - Have not received review feedback yet, difficult to find the reviewer.
23.03.09 After more than 6 months, it is finally decided to withdraw the submission.
The decline of IET is really not without reason, slow review process, expensive fees, editors not responding to emails... Goodbye! Hope to never see it again.

(0) Thank | 宛飞丞

Summary: Average quality, responsible journal editors, low impact factor, easy submission process. Submitted to TII and got rejected after 7 months due to lack of experiments. Submitted to IET RPG to fulfill graduation requirements after conducting experiments. First review took over a month with minimal core content modifications. Accepted after second review, taking a total of 3 months, with a low impact factor.

(1) Thank | SCI马

2022.8.17 Submission
2022.8.17-9.09 Pending Editor Assignment Sent email to inquire, but received no reply
2022.9.09-9.21 Pending Editor Assignment Sent second email to inquire, associate editor said they are looking for reviewers
2022.10.25-Present Under Review
Feels like the process is slow, hope the review can be faster!

(2) Thank | 宛飞丞

May I ask who your editor is?

(0) Thank | 宛飞丞

IET Renewable Power Generation 
2022.09.08
Pending Editor Assignment
2022.09.09
Under Review
2022.10.01
Pending Recommendation
2022.10.03
Major Revision

2022.10.31
Undergoing initial checking
2022.10.31
Under Review
2022.11.19
Pending Recommendation
2022.11.22
Pending Decision
2022.11.22
Accept

(0) Thank | leotan000

Two reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision.
Submitted in early November 2021.
Received major revision feedback in mid-December 2021.
Submitted revised version in mid-January 2022.
Received minor revision feedback in early February 2022.
Submitted final revised version at the end of February 2022.
Accepted on April 1st, 2022.

(0) Thank | 小手

2020.10 submission, 2022.03 acceptance, 6 months for the first review, 6 months for the second review, 4 months for the third review. Relatively slow. It has now become Zone 3.

(0) Thank | 游客1