The review is quite fast =========== March 4th, submission; March 9th, AE assigned; May 15th, comments returned, with a Reconsider and Major revisions. The problems raised by the three reviewers can be solved very well, there were no technical problems, and they were all positive comments. ================= On June 12, the revised manuscript submitted, and then it had been with associate editor; on July 13, the status changed to awaiting editor review; on July 14, comments returned, still with a Reconsider and Major revisions. The first and third reviewers felt okay with it. The second reviewer had one problem and still pointed out that there was a problem with the certification part of the appendix. We rechecked it and found that it was more serious and quite hidden descriptive problems. Thanks to the carefulness of the reviewer, otherwise it will be very troublesome to publish directly. =================== July 21, the revised manuscript submitted; July 25, it changed from under review to with associate editor; August 24, it changed to awaiting editor review; August 25, accepted. ================== The review cycle is very stable, and the total time is less than 6 months.

(31) Thank | dl23321

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Time line: 1. First submission 2019.07.16, ID and ADM were assigned after the completion of the manuscript and the cover letter; Status: Awaiting Admin Processing; The second day status: Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment. 2. 2019.07.20, assigned AE; Status: Under review=============Long waiting============3. 2019.10.30, major revisions were required to be made within two months (the comments were pertinent and a lot of expansions were required) 4. 2019.12.23, the first revision will be submitted. 5. 2020.2.7, the second review comments came back, and the major revisions were required again (actually few opinions) 6. 2020.3.8, the second revision was submitted ==========Long waiting============ 7. 2020.05.28 I sent a reminder letter. 8. 2020.06.05 I received the notification of acceptance. 9. Copyright was transferred on June 14, 2020. 10. The follow-up is the proofreading. I paid the extra page processing fee. It was about 11 months in total. Although it took a long time, the result was good.

(10) Thank | 妮妮巴拉巴拉

Manuscript submitted, 05-Apr-2020; under review, 05-Apr-2020; reject and resubmit, 11-Jun-2020; manuscript resubmitted, 22-Jun-2020; under review, 23-Jun -2020; with associate editor, 06-Jul-2020. The submission process was extremely difficult. In the first submission there were a total of 2 reviewers. Both reviewers wrote sentences similar to “accept this paper after revised” in their comments, but the editor gave a rejection. After that, I modified it with tears and submitted it again. Over 10 days later, the status changed from under review to with associate editor. Give some suggestions to the friends who submitted to this journal. First of all, I think it is not very easy to be accepted, and the editor is still very strict. In addition, the review cycle of this journal is difficult to describe in one word. A friend around me spent 6 months on the first review, and another friend spent 7 months from submission to acceptance. At the same time, I also want to ask other friends, is it a good thing to change from under review to with associate editor over 10 days later. Does any friend have the same experience?

(39) Thank | 欧拉公式

Add a sentence, dear students and colleagues, the characteristics of your awesome trans are as follows:1. Your formula pushes the flow of water (60 formulas (extensions of exaggeration). The extremely complex representation of the transformed letter combination can be simplified.) The experiment is usually done with colored markers (because it is so huge according to you)The perfect formula that your lab can't do)2. Your ideas are very innovative (this is impeccable)3. Your experiment is very good, and the formula is less problematic (provided that the derivation is correct).Explain that there is no waste in your formula, which is consistent with the experiment.

(3) Thank | TLBJ

May I ask how long you have been using the AE allocation?

(0) Thank | 碧莲百合

AE: Dania Marabissi

(0) Thank | chestnutmomo

I am too.

(0) Thank | Zhou&Min

AE: Pokhrel, Shiva Raj. Extremely slow, the second review is also stuck at under review.

(0) Thank | Oliverlzy

Mine too. What is the status of your second review now, and who is your account executive?

(0) Thank | wxy

May I ask which AE handled this?

(0) Thank | wxy

It's been three months since the second review, and it still hasn't been sent out...

(0) Thank | wxy

Unified reply: If the status in the One system shows "Ur," it means it is in external review; if it is in second review or later, it is in the hands of the chief editor and has not been sent out. Only after it is WithAE will it be sent out and in the hands of the reviewer.

(0) Thank | 月与寒山寺

It has been one month since the resubmission and it is still under review. Is it in the hands of the reviewers or the Associate Editor?

(0) Thank | weixinlala

Submitted in February.
Rejection at the speed of light on April 10th.

Key points:
One of the three reviewers left their section completely blank.
The second reviewer only wrote a few simple explanatory questions (clearly did not read the article).
The third reviewer wrote, "A major revision is required."

The final decision was rejection, and I have already sent an appeal email.

The revision letter, combined, is not as long as a single reviewer comment from another journal. No additional files were requested, just a straight rejection.

It's outrageous, I wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience.

(0) Thank | 厉害了33

After the repair, Ur may also be in the hands of the reviewer?

(0) Thank | wxy

There is a problem, actually it was sent back for rework here, and I immediately turned into with AE. This state was actually caused by editing operations, and there are also some opinions from individual reviewers returning.

(0) Thank | Sci aaaaa

May I ask if the product that was sent back for rework two and a half months ago is still under review, or has it not been submitted for review yet?

(0) Thank | wxy

Here is a piece of advice for everyone: if your first review takes three months, then the second review will likely take 10 to 20 days less than three months. This pattern continues for subsequent reviews. Currently, it seems that everyone's time frame is following this pattern.

(0) Thank | 月与寒山寺

2024.11.2 Submit
2024.11.2 Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment
2024.11.17 Under review
2024.12.21 With Associate Editor
2024.12.22 Awaiting Editor Review (reject and resubmit)
2025.02.19 Resubmit
2025.02.19 Awaiting Admin Processing
2025.02.21 Under review
2025.02.21 With Associate Editor
2025.04.01 Awaiting Editor Review (Reconsider, Major Revisions)
2025.04.08 Resubmit
2025.04.08 Under review
2025.04.09 Awaiting Editor Review
2025.04.09 Accept for Final Submission

(0) Thank | 月与寒山寺

Hey guys, how long does your second review usually take? It's been three months since the second review with the associate editor, is this normal or have they added more reviewers?

(0) Thank | cccc1

24.0909 Submission
24.12.15 Major revision
25.0113 Resubmission
25.0223 Major revision
25.0228 Resubmission
25.0407 Acceptance

(0) Thank | QKQ1028

Submitted on the 21st, waiting for AE assignment on the 22nd. AE has not been assigned yet, is this speed normal?

(0) Thank | mazino

Oh my god, me too. I thought I was the only one so slow.

(0) Thank | cbeat

Family members, how long does the first trial generally take?

(0) Thank | 奋斗的小万

So slow, shivering.

(0) Thank | 奋斗的小万