The review is quite fast =========== March 4th, submission; March 9th, AE assigned; May 15th, comments returned, with a Reconsider and Major revisions. The problems raised by the three reviewers can be solved very well, there were no technical problems, and they were all positive comments. ================= On June 12, the revised manuscript submitted, and then it had been with associate editor; on July 13, the status changed to awaiting editor review; on July 14, comments returned, still with a Reconsider and Major revisions. The first and third reviewers felt okay with it. The second reviewer had one problem and still pointed out that there was a problem with the certification part of the appendix. We rechecked it and found that it was more serious and quite hidden descriptive problems. Thanks to the carefulness of the reviewer, otherwise it will be very troublesome to publish directly. =================== July 21, the revised manuscript submitted; July 25, it changed from under review to with associate editor; August 24, it changed to awaiting editor review; August 25, accepted. ================== The review cycle is very stable, and the total time is less than 6 months.

(31) Thank | dl23321

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. Time line: 1. First submission 2019.07.16, ID and ADM were assigned after the completion of the manuscript and the cover letter; Status: Awaiting Admin Processing; The second day status: Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment. 2. 2019.07.20, assigned AE; Status: Under review=============Long waiting============3. 2019.10.30, major revisions were required to be made within two months (the comments were pertinent and a lot of expansions were required) 4. 2019.12.23, the first revision will be submitted. 5. 2020.2.7, the second review comments came back, and the major revisions were required again (actually few opinions) 6. 2020.3.8, the second revision was submitted ==========Long waiting============ 7. 2020.05.28 I sent a reminder letter. 8. 2020.06.05 I received the notification of acceptance. 9. Copyright was transferred on June 14, 2020. 10. The follow-up is the proofreading. I paid the extra page processing fee. It was about 11 months in total. Although it took a long time, the result was good.

(10) Thank | 妮妮巴拉巴拉

Manuscript submitted, 05-Apr-2020; under review, 05-Apr-2020; reject and resubmit, 11-Jun-2020; manuscript resubmitted, 22-Jun-2020; under review, 23-Jun -2020; with associate editor, 06-Jul-2020. The submission process was extremely difficult. In the first submission there were a total of 2 reviewers. Both reviewers wrote sentences similar to “accept this paper after revised” in their comments, but the editor gave a rejection. After that, I modified it with tears and submitted it again. Over 10 days later, the status changed from under review to with associate editor. Give some suggestions to the friends who submitted to this journal. First of all, I think it is not very easy to be accepted, and the editor is still very strict. In addition, the review cycle of this journal is difficult to describe in one word. A friend around me spent 6 months on the first review, and another friend spent 7 months from submission to acceptance. At the same time, I also want to ask other friends, is it a good thing to change from under review to with associate editor over 10 days later. Does any friend have the same experience?

(39) Thank | 欧拉公式

Add a sentence, dear students and colleagues, the characteristics of your awesome trans are as follows:1. Your formula pushes the flow of water (60 formulas (extensions of exaggeration). The extremely complex representation of the transformed letter combination can be simplified.) The experiment is usually done with colored markers (because it is so huge according to you)The perfect formula that your lab can't do)2. Your ideas are very innovative (this is impeccable)3. Your experiment is very good, and the formula is less problematic (provided that the derivation is correct).Explain that there is no waste in your formula, which is consistent with the experiment.

(3) Thank | TLBJ

Is there a high chance of refusing to engage in heavy speculation?

(0) Thank | 加油吧123

0507 submission
0722 with ae
0810 Editor-in-chief decides to reject and resubmit.

(0) Thank | 加油吧123

I want to ask if the state of your small repair has changed from "ur" to "ae"?

(0) Thank | sciAAA

How are your results now?

(0) Thank | sciAAA

Accepted with Minor Revisions as a Paper

Does this status mean acceptance?

(0) Thank | 时间里的f人

Dear experts, it has been four months since the early access, and I would like to officially publish it for graduation. Is there any way to urge the editorial department? It's too slow and I'm really desperate.

(0) Thank | dddd_123

My paper has been accepted, with just minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status showed "under review". When I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" section. Can any experts tell me what's going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, but with minor modifications. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status still shows "under review". When I submitted this revision, it never appeared in the "AE" section. Can any experts tell me what is going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, but with minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and it still shows "under review". This time when I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can someone please tell me what's going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, just with some minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status is still showing as "under review". When I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what is going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, but with minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status still shows "under review". When I submitted this latest revision, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what's going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, but with minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status is currently showing as "under review". When I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what is going on? Thanks.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, but with some minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago and it still shows "under review". When I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any expert tell me what's going on?

(0) Thank | Mark2710

My paper has been accepted, with just minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status showed as "under review". When I submitted the revisions, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what is going on?

(0) Thank | Mark2710

My paper has been accepted, with just minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and it still shows "under review." When I submitted this revision, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what is going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Hello, my paper has been accepted, with just minor revisions. I submitted it over ten days ago, and the status still shows "under review". When I submitted this latest revision, it never appeared in the "AE" column. Can any experts tell me what is going on? Thank you.

(0) Thank | Mark2710

Congratulations, OP!!! Good luck, hope you can successfully submit your work.

(0) Thank | vigigo

2025.05 Submission
2025.07 Reconsider, Major Revisions

(0) Thank | waxxx

Please include this in the supplementary materials.

(0) Thank | Aaron

When submitting a rejected manuscript for re-review in the new system, the editor replied that the file was not submitted as requested. I do not understand how he wants me to submit it. The compressed LATEX package to be submitted contains a response, the PDF file of the article has also been submitted, and the response has also been submitted in the place for submitting comments.

(1) Thank | 马元强

Hello, I have also gone through two rounds of major revisions. May I ask if there is only one reviewer left for the third round? Is reviewer s1 still reviewing or editing the manuscript as shown on the system?

(0) Thank | xxx_