2020/03/01, submitted; 2020/03/21, in peer review; 2020/07/08, major revision; 2020/07/08–2020/08/15, revised the manuscript; 2020/08/15, the revised manuscript was submitted, it directly into “in peer review”; 2020/09/19, accepted. It is a top journal on image processing. The submission process was very formal and rigorous; the reviewers were very nice and the comments raised were very important. Revise carefully, and regard the revision process as a friendly communication with the experts, and the manuscript will finally be recognized and accepted.

(14) Thank | 科研菜鸟

Submitted in June 2018; first review opinion required a major revision (RQ) in February 2019; revised submission in April 2019; second review opinion (RQ) received in August 2019; revision submitted in October 2019; rejected in the third review in January 2020. It lasted nearly 19 months and was finally rejected. The reviewer and editor gave me two opportunities, but my revision was not as good as the last one, and it was ultimately rejected. While sad, I also expressed admiration for the rigor and seriousness of the journal. Less innovative articles are not recommended to be submitted to this journal. The review cycle is very long, and the rejection will delay a lot of time, which is not worthwhile.

(22) Thank | 曹孟德

It took nearly 15 months and we sent nearly 10 reminders in the middle. I finally got relaxed today. 2018.04.16 Submitted; 2018.05.18 In Peer Review, section editor preliminary reviewed, no associate editor assigned; 2018.06.11 Submitted (section editor agreed to send for review) ;2018.07.02 In Peer Review, associate editor assigned; 2018.10.21 Awaiting AE Decision; 2018.10.25 Major Revision (Due 2018.12.05); 2018.12.02 Major revision submitted, and the status directly changed to In Peer Review; 2019.04.18 Awaiting AE Decision; 2019.04.18 Accept with Mandatory Minor Revisions Including English Usage (Due 2019.05.08); 2019.04.22 minor revision version submitted, and the status changes For In Peer Review; 2019.07.06 Accept.

(28) Thank | hungter

Good reviews will improve your paper. Mostly responsible reviewers.

(53) Thank | 名字不重要

August 8, 2024: submitted
September 26, 2024: in peer review
October 4, 2024: submitted
December 4, 2024: in peer review
January 22, 2025: Awaiting AE Decision
January 27, 2025: in peer review
April 26, 2025: Awaiting SAE Decision Approval

(0) Thank | Salient!

My point is that the initial review is taking too long, and I am starting to lose hope for a positive outcome.

(0) Thank | asdwwwwww

The submission deadline is December 31, 2024. From April 11 until now, the status has been awaiting AE decision. Does this mean it has been rejected after initial review?

(0) Thank | asdwwwwww

Isn't it IEEE? Why can we find Elsevier?

(0) Thank | 秋哥

2025.2.28 submitted
2025.3.26 Author's contribution rejected and resubmitted
2025.4.23 in peer review

(0) Thank | white_

2025.3.26 Authorship unclear, returned for resubmission
2025.4.23 In Peer Review (Almost had to write a letter to the journal, it's really slow! Hopefully there will be a good outcome for my lengthy article)

(0) Thank | white_

Journal papers are like this, with a lot of relationship-based connections. Just get used to it! Don't get too worked up. If you have enough confidence in your work, I sincerely encourage you to submit to the top 6 conferences (ICCV, CVPR, ECCV, NIPS, ICML, ICLR), where the experts gather and the cutting-edge of research is. If it weren't for meeting graduation requirements, I wouldn't bother submitting to journals!

(0) Thank | 打，打，打个大西瓜

Not yet.

(0) Thank | redmery

Did you follow up after submitting 9-30? I am in the same situation, it has been two and a half months since I submitted my supplementary contribution and it is still marked as submitted.

(0) Thank | 腿腿

Have you updated your status?

(0) Thank | 腿腿

After acceptance, how long will it take for the article to be published online and indexed?

(0) Thank | misterjia

How long after being hired can I publish online and have it searchable?

(0) Thank | misterjia

Hey, has your status changed? Is it still Under Review? What will the status be after review?

(0) Thank | wangzengshuo

Has any senior submitted any manuscripts in the new system in the past few months? It has been under review for over two weeks, and I am not sure if it can be sent for review. Will the status change if it is sent for review?

(0) Thank | wangzengshuo

Can't we contact ADM to ask?

(0) Thank | Ye_vanish

Have you received the results of your AQ?

(0) Thank | xilai Li

Sharing a submission experience
2024.07.29 submitted
2024.09.18 in peer review
2024.09.30 submitted 
2024.11.16 in peer review
2025.01.01 awaiting ae decision
2025.01.06 awaiting sae decision approval
2025.01.15 major revision(1aq,2mr)
2025.02.26 in peer review
2025.03.27 awaiting ae decision
2025.04.08 awaiting sae decision approval
Will update after receiving the results.

(0) Thank | Ye_vanish

Why do the reviewers of TIP journals like to use GPT for reviewing manuscripts? 
Summary of the paper: Lack of innovation, insufficient experiments, and lack of details result in rejection, and then not providing any review comments at all? 
We call on TIP journals to severely punish such irresponsible reviewers who only want the identity of reviewers.

(0) Thank | Canyang

Submitted at the end of September 2024, under review until April 1, 2025...

(0) Thank | mlkk

Sep 12 2024 Submitted
10-30 2024 In Peer Review
10-31 2024 Submitted
1-8 2025 In Peer Review
3-16 2025 Awaiting AE Decision
3-18 2025 Awaiting SAE Decision Approval
3-19 2025 Awaiting AE Decision
3-26 2025 Awaiting SAE Decision Approval
Reject (29-Mar-2025)
Result: 1 major revision, 1 minor revision, 1 rejection
Reviewer ~ using gpt to generate some vague and non-novel comments and then rejecting, can you please take a closer look? It's a waste of emotions, a waste of time!! Waiting almost 7 months to see the comments generated by your gpt, it's really frustrating!

(0) Thank | 论文全中！

"Both submissions have encountered unidentified organisms, with no specific opinions given. Using GPT to generate some vague clichés that lack novelty and then reject it. To be honest, waiting six months to see this kind of thing is quite infuriating. It's really frustrating to be rejected because of one person.!!! Others all just need minor revisions."

(0) Thank | 论文全中！