2020.2.24 Submission. The comments were given after two months, and it was required to finish the revision within one month. It got accepted directly after the revised submission, but it was not published until December. Friends who are not in a hurry to have it published officially can wait patiently after the acceptance. After all, the publication in a bimonthly journal will be slower.

(2) Thank | chriiisssy

I heard about the TDEI name since I enrolled in school, but it was the first time I submitted in this journal this year. The opinions were returned in 2 months after submission, and revision was asked to be completed within 1 month. However, because of the epidemic, I couldn't return to school to supplement the experiment. After I responded to them, I revised it for entire 3 months before returning the revision. During the period, the editor’s attitude was very good, the review comments were also very rigorous and professional, and the experience was very good. I will submit to this journal next time.

(12) Thank | 皮卡丘！使用电光一闪！

I have an article accepted last year. It was about the performance prediction of insulating devices. It took two months for the first review, and one month was given for the revision. It was accepted directly after revision. I was surprised at that time, thinking that there would be external review. However, the insulation field is not popular all the time, and the impact factor rises and falls. When will the impact factor rise like (journals on) artificial intelligence?

(6) Thank | kevin91

Online submission; after the submission, the editor will contact the author via email. The review period is longer, and it usually takes half a year to get reviews. Publishing after acceptance is also very slow. This journal is an authoritative journal in the field of electrical insulation. Submission is difficult.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

After submitting the manuscript, the first major revision was done after 8 months, followed by the second major revision about 1 month after the half-month revision. About half a month after the revision, the manuscript was finally accepted, making the whole process from submission to acceptance nearly 11 months. At least it was accepted, and coincidentally, I was promoted to the second-tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in March 2025. I wanted to share this good news with everyone and wish you all the best.

(0) Thank | Yehaixing123

27 January 2025 - submitted
10 March 2025—Received first major revision
13 April 2025—submitted major revision
23 April 2025- Accepted

(0) Thank | animeshsarkartusher@gmail.com

Is there any change in status after submission?

(0) Thank | 锅炉

Is it always in the "Under Review" status before receiving feedback, or does it change after submission for review? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 锅炉

Submitted on July 24, 2024
Minor revisions on September 18
Outcome unknown

(0) Thank | XHNDXH

Dielectric

(1) Thank | 一个喷子

2024.3.7 Submission
2024.6.7 Revision (Major revision)
Standard 3-month review process. Two reviewers, both focused on the algorithm in my article. They pointed out nothing but issues with the electrolyte. I was completely puzzled. However, their questions were very professional, one of them raised 6 questions, each of them very lengthy, it felt like they were educating me on electrolyte knowledge. The other reviewer found the topic of the article very interesting and provided 15 suggestions

(0) Thank | 一个喷子

Submission timeline for reference:
2024.01.04 submitted
03.20 major revisions
03.26 submitted
05.16 minor modifications
05.21 submitted 
06.08 accepted

(0) Thank | Southern penguin

The speed of this journal's review process is as fast as the PD. If it's not processed by next month, I will withdraw the submission and submit to the PD. Anyway, it's all about waiting

(0) Thank | 三尺秋水尘不染

Three months later, major repairs will be conducted. Four months later, minor repairs will be carried out. Then, employment will take place in ten days.

(0) Thank | 机电耦合

Hello classmate, I would like to ask you a question. I am planning to submit an article to this journal, and according to the submission guidelines, it says that I need to send a separate abstract to the editor-in-chief. I am confused whether I should send the email to the editor-in-chief separately while submitting on the official website, or should I first send the email to the editor-in-chief and then submit the article after receiving their reply confirming that we can submit based on the abstract content? Thank you for your response.

(0) Thank | 科研小 白

DEI is becoming slower and I don't know how the new system is. It has indeed taken about a month for initial review of several manuscripts, and the reviewers take 3 to 4 months for their reviews...
What's even more concerning is that the reviewers' comments are becoming less professional. They only focus on trivial and insignificant issues, completely missing the key points.
It's difficult to motivate oneself to continue submitting work, as the illusion of highly professional journals keeps shattering.

(1) Thank | Trifles

I want to ask, when the submission of a journal article changes to "under review," does it mean it has been arranged for review? How can I find out if the content is suitable for this journal?

(0) Thank | 机电耦合

It has been 8 months already, and the editing work has been handed over to the experts. Until now, there has been no response, and the longer I wait, the more uneasy I feel.

(0) Thank | HEBUTZJQ

Unable to view the status of the manuscript.

(0) Thank | 皮卡丘！使用电光一闪！

The speed is really dependent on the reviewers. I submitted two articles on May 20th and May 23rd. I received the first round of comments for one of the articles, which was submitted on May 20th, on July 8th. The comments included both minor and major revisions, and the reviewer's opinions were very professional. They gave me four weeks to make the revisions. Today, July 27th, I have completed the revisions based on the first round of comments. However, I have not received any feedback yet for the article submitted on May 23rd. TDEI can be considered as the top journal in my field, and it is also a prestigious journal for mystical studies.

(0) Thank | 为什么是草莓君

Do you know where to check the status of the manuscript?

(0) Thank | bobo10086

Hello, I recently submitted an article to this journal, but I don't know the status of my manuscript. I have been searching for a long time but I can't find where to check it. Could you please tell me where I can check the status of my manuscript?

(0) Thank | bobo10086

Can I attach support information as an attachment in IEEE transactions, like those additional Word files in Elsevier, etc.?

(0) Thank | goodjob

Posted on February 3rd, received first review comments on May 23rd, revised the same day, accepted on June 15th, received proof on the same day, and the next day was notified that editing is complete and waiting for publication.

(7) Thank | 皮卡丘！使用电光一闪！

To be honest, the process is very difficult, and the middle has been repaired twice, but the review comments given twice are quite positive. The journal has a low impact factor, but it is the top issue in the field of electrical insulation.It is a bit difficult to accept. Both of my classmates have rejected the manuscript at the same time. They are very innovative. In addition, due to the new editor, the manuscript processing speed is much faster than before.

(14) Thank | 理工学渣