It took 4 months and a half in total. 2020.06.07, submitted to the journal; 2020.07.13, reject and resubmit; 2020.08.24, major revision; 2020.09.22, accept. The review of this journal was formal and meticulous, especially some reviewers were very serious and had many problems! It is a very good journal.

(16) Thank | ViviTsai

2020/04/24, submission (then the status in the system was always undergoing review); 2020/05/21, the decision was returned: major revision (the revised manuscript must be returned in 28 days). It was faster than I expected, the result came out in less than one month. My article was on cross application of artificial intelligence and remote sensing. There were three reviewers and more than 20 comments in total. Some were discussion issues, some were language issues, and some were experimental content issues. The reviewers were professional and responsible, and the issues (raised) were very accurate. I don't know why it is stipulated that I must submit the revision within 28 days (4 weeks). In addition, the editor now has sent two emails to remind me that the revision must be submitted before the deadline, otherwise it should be resubmitted. Because of the need to do new experiments, time is actually a bit rushed. It is currently under revision. I will share the experience with you when there is news later. I hope it can be accepted later!

(21) Thank | 贫民窟的科学家

The manuscript was submitted on the 12th, and it was rejected on 16th for being not suitable for the journal scope based on the reference. The speed is extremely fast… It is not clear that this is the adequate venue for your manuscript... Your list of references is a strong indication that your manuscript targets the Geophysics and Geology community. It may indeed not belong to remote sensing, but it is indeed a study of earth science issues. So I must use remote sensing methods to study Geoscience?

(0) Thank | 竹泉听风

Nearly half a year for the first review. The second and final reviews were relatively smooth. Both reviewers were professional.

(8) Thank | Robert3443@vip.qq.com

Has your article been accepted for publication?

(0) Thank | Jh_SCUT

Can you please clarify if resubmitting a rejected manuscript is considered as major revision? What are the main keywords in the response?

(0) Thank | Paxil

Please check the status of the submission on the official website, and then carefully review the comments from the associate editor. There are usually major or minor keywords to look out for.

(0) Thank | Paxil

3.30 submitted
6.5 received first-round comments
By the way, will the opinions of GRSL clearly indicate whether it is minor or major revision? I didn't see it in the Decision letter.

(0) Thank | answer365

How much is the layout fee for this?

(0) Thank | 哎呀呀呀呀论文真难

2025-05-24 Rejection
The first review process took over 3 months, and the rejection letter stated that the manuscript "falls outside this format" and suggested submitting to TGRS instead, with a link for submission provided. The reviewer also recommended supplementing the manuscript with additional experimental data before resubmitting to TGRS.
I'm curious, is this a polite way of rejecting the manuscript or a genuine suggestion to submit to TGRS?

(0) Thank | Aplomb

Submission on 2025-02-16
Still under first review, the review speed may be related to the research direction.

(0) Thank | Aplomb

Three reviewers, each with six or seven points. It seems quite common for articles to be rejected and resubmitted for IGRSL, as many below have experienced rejection and resubmission.

(0) Thank | 常棣

How many people provided feedback on the review? What is the probability of rejection and resubmission?

(0) Thank | 3%

2025-03-07 Submission
2025-04-09 Rejection and Re-submission

(0) Thank | 常棣

The journals of IEEE are under review from submission to acceptance. My paper is under external review.

(0) Thank | wang

Bro, do you have any updates now? Did the journal accept the submission or is it still under review?

(0) Thank | answer365

Brother, do you have any results now? Will this journal become "Under Review" once the submission is successful?

(0) Thank | answer365

First submission on February 22, 2025.
The editor rejected the submission on February 27, 2025, saying that the images in the article needed to be remade as they were not clear.
Submitted again on February 27, 2025.
No news yet. Should I give the bank full marks? Hope to receive feedback soon. I am currently in my second year of graduate school and hope to get published before graduation.

(0) Thank | wang

Very good journal, reviewers are fast and professional. Editors are responsible.

(0) Thank | 奔跑的鱼

Hello, I would like to ask, my status is "create a revision", with 21 days for modification. After I completed the modifications and submitted the response, is this the 8-day stage you mentioned?

(0) Thank | 猪肉炖粉条子

Could you please tell me how the layout fee is calculated?

(0) Thank | ZYS

Did you invest later on?

(0) Thank | 李H

24.5.14 submitted
24.7.16 reject and resubmit
24.9.6 resubmit
24.9.16 accept

(2) Thank | xiezilailai

Dude, why are you still investing when the reputation is bad? Don't bite the hand that feeds you and then blame it, should we just issue a warning tomorrow?

(2) Thank | 学吊一枚

The specific timeline is as follows: 
- 2024.07.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review 
- 2024.08.21 Manuscript Need Revision, with comments from two reviewers overall positive, estimated minor revisions needed 
- 2024.09.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review, with Response and revised paper submitted 
- 2024.09.10 Accept, with the associate editor's opinion being Accept as is 
Overall, the first review took longer, 50 days in total, while the second review only took 8 days, possibly due to the thorough and well-presented Response.

(0) Thank | OneSway