In the first review, two reviewers raised many good suggestions, and the editor gave the opportunity to resubmit! After more than 20 days of revision, I resubmitted it and wrote the ID of the previous manuscript. The second submission was also marked accordingly. However, it was estimated that the editor was not the original editor, and the reviewers were not the original reviewers. The comments given were completely wrong. Too hasty! The reviewers in the first review and second review were different, which was very unfair. The manuscript was revised in accordance with the comments of the first review. The editor and reviewers were changed in the second review, their comments must be different.

(7) Thank | dongdongding

I received the notice of acceptance this morning, the result of the first review was raised in 40 days, and 20 days after revision, it was accepted. There were 2 reviewers in total. In the first review, one reviewer only had some grammatical suggestions, and the other reviewer had three comments, all of which hit the nail on the head. I spent more than one week revising it, and finally there was a good result. 6.21, submitted; 9.14, accepted. It took less than three months, and the efficiency of this journal is indeed ok. Although not as good as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, the journal is quite recognized in the industry.

(145) Thank | 不忘初心@

Submitted at the end of July 2019; receive the first review result at the beginning of September 2019, rejection and resubmission; submitted at the beginning of December 2019; receive the second review result at the end of December 2019, minor revision; submitted at the end of January 2020; accepted in February 2020.

(4) Thank | 匿名1234

Very good journal, the review comments are punctual, the editor is very responsible.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Hello, how long after submitting your EA did it get officially published? I submitted my EA in early June and it still hasn't been published, even after the 6/20 Proof.

(0) Thank | 阿牛哥

Hello, how long did your admin Not Assigned status last before it ended?

(0) Thank | 阿牛哥

Hello, how long did your admin Not Assigned status last before it ended?

(0) Thank | 阿牛哥

The review speed is very fast, and the quality of the review comments is also very high.
4.1 Submitted
4.30 Rejected for major revision
5.8 Submitted
5.9 Under review at Journal of Admin
5.10 Under review
5.25 Waiting for Associate Editor
5.29 Waiting for Technical Editor
5.30 Waiting for Editor-in-Chief decision
5.30 Accepted

(0) Thank | 阿牛哥

I have been in the status of "dmin Not Assigned" for a month now. Can I send an email to inquire about it?

(0) Thank | svsav

2025-2-28: Submit
2025-3-30: Reject & Resubmit
2025-4-3: a resubmission has been submitted
2025-4-29: Accept

(1) Thank | Minghuan2425

Could you please confirm if every author needs to confirm? Or is it sufficient to have just one confirmation? Also, how long will it take to proofread? Thank you for your response.

(0) Thank | PIPIPIPIZHU

Could you please confirm if every author needs to confirm, or if just one confirmation is sufficient? Also, how long until the proofing process is completed? Thank you.

(0) Thank | PIPIPIPIZHU

Here are some time points in the article submission process for reference:

2025.02.20 Submit
2025.02.26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2025.03.13 Awaiting AE Recommendation
2025.03.15 Awaiting TE Recommendation
2025.03.16 Reject & Resubmit
2025.04.08 Resubmit (Awaiting Administrator Processing)
2025.04.14 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2025.04.20 Awaiting AE Recommendation
2025.04.21 Awaiting TE Recommendation
2025.04.23 Accept

AWPL is still quite fast compared to journals like TAP and TTST.

(0) Thank | youhayouha

How long does "Awaiting Administrator Processing" last? It's been four or five days and still like this.

(1) Thank | yuninn

I made several revisions over the past month, such as ensuring the article content did not exceed four pages, adjusting the font size of images, and not including Support Information. After addressing all issues by January 21st, I started looking for reviewers. By early March, I received feedback that the topic did not align with the scope and did not involve electromagnetics, leading to rejection by one reviewer and the editor.

(0) Thank | YuanGaoy

I made the changes and also wrote a revision note. I submitted a revised document with track changes and a clean version without any markings.

(0) Thank | niming

Excuse me, OP, did you make any changes to the article when you reposted it? I have completely revamped it, so I'm not sure if I should make any further edits.

(0) Thank | TAPAWPL

This article's acceptance process was a bit complicated. It was delayed for several months due to my own reasons. Let me share my experience.

Year 24
5.22 Submitted
8.4 Rejected
The first round had two reviewers. Reviewer 1 suggested revisions, while Reviewer 2 thought the article's motivation was unclear. The editor also noted unclear motivation and rejected the article.

Since the email did not mention the option to resubmit after rejection, I thought it was a complete rejection and did not handle the manuscript. Later, I realized that the reviewers' comments were not difficult to address, so after more than 2 months, I decided to resubmit. This time, I submitted a new manuscript, but I was unsure whether to include a revision statement. I asked a fellow author who had been accepted on LetPub, and he advised against it (I was also a bit lazy), so I did not include a revision statement.

24.10 Submitted
24.11 Rejected (Editor said it was a resubmitted manuscript and needed a revision statement)
24.11 Resubmitted
24.11 Rejected (Initial manuscript body cannot exceed 4 pages, with the fifth page only for references)
24.11 Resubmitted
24.12 Under review
1.22 Minor revisions accepted
1.22 Minor revisions completed
1.30 Waiting for reviewer scores
2.21 Accepted

So, don't give up after the first rejection! Always include a revision statement when resubmitting.

(1) Thank | niming

I am in the same situation. I have been investing for almost a week now, but there has been no change at all.

(0) Thank | cyq4782

Did you continue to review after submitting the minor revisions?

(0) Thank | niming

Me too, is it because the editorial department is on vacation?

(0) Thank | JHJXD

2024.08.20 Submit
2024.09.19 Reject-resubmit (major revision)
2024.10.02 Submit
2024.11.23 Reject-resubmit (major revision)
2024.11.28 Submit
2024.12.16 Minor revision
2024.12.21 Submit
2025.01.10 Accept

After 144 days, two major revisions, and one minor revision, it was finally accepted. Thank you so much. This is my first article in the second-tier journal.

(0) Thank | 科颜

Submitted for two weeks, still not assigned by admin.

(0) Thank | happiness11

Submitted for review on November 4th, 2024.

(0) Thank | 第欧根尼的酒桶

A very good journal, wish the journal will do better and better!

(0) Thank | 资深投稿人