Hypertension is a very time-sensitive journal. The review period is no longer than 28 days. My article was in minor revision for 3 months. Our department has submitted 15 articles from 2010 to the present, and currently had 3 articles accepted, which is close to the acceptance rate of this journal.

(0) Thank | yuxiufeng0806@126.com

Hypertension, first review took 28 days, second review took 20 days. It was received yesterday, with a total time of 5 months.

(0) Thank | duan_2020

Submitted on August 7th, it is still in the first round of review. The agonizing wait continues...

(0) Thank | duan_2020

Same question, any results?

(0) Thank | 舒兰小仙女

Second External Audit

(0) Thank | 坠星倩影

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, with the headings ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 水月秀兰

Is it considered under external review if the status changes from submitted to under review to decision back to under review? Or is it being reviewed by the associate editor?

(0) Thank | 风芹小哥哥

Is it submitted--under review--decision--under review, that means it has been sent for external review? Or is it with the associate editor?

(0) Thank | 风芹小哥哥

Hello! I would like to ask how long it takes from online to formal publication, thank you

(0) Thank | 是昕雨吖

Hello! I would like to ask how long it takes from online to official publication, thank you

(0) Thank | 是昕雨吖

Authoritative journal in the field of cardiovascular, difficult to submit, high quality articles required, need to have a certain level of innovation. Submission difficulty and article quality are both in the 7-9 range, without any superficial content. However, there is still a gap compared to CIRCULATION RESEARCH

(0) Thank | 邻家飞跃

#Cardiovascular# Pulmonary hypertension, 1st review for 12 days with three reviewers, major revision, resubmitted after two months, 2nd review for 2 days, one reviewer had questions, resubmitted after 2 days, 3rd review for 1 day, accepted, publishing requires great innovation and effort, not easy!

(0) Thank | 子睿Sama

Help: I need to find a supplement to an article in this magazine, how can I do that?

(0) Thank | 华清阏逢

Do you have the submission link of his? Can you share it with me?

(0) Thank | 骨架雪磊

High accuracy of hit rate

(0) Thank | Oliver Jerry

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: Rejected after 3 weeks of review, feeling down

(0) Thank | 落雁正业

Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: I received an acceptance notification this morning. Hypertension is a very time-sensitive journal, with a review period of no more than 28 days. My article was given 3 months for minor revisions, with strict deadlines. If the article exceeds 3 months, it will be evaluated as a new submission. Our department has submitted a total of 15 articles from 2010 to now, with 3 accepted so far, which is close to the acceptance rate of this journal. Personally, I have submitted 2 articles, the first one in 2013. After a major revision and the requirement for further modifications, I gave up because I was facing my doctoral graduation at the time. Today's submission went smoothly, with minor revisions and feasible requests for additional experiments. It took about 2 months to complete all the required experiments, communicating solely through data

(0) Thank | 东风采蓉

The problem of the external auditorA burst of blood, can not be evaded.It is very laborious to answer.It took 3 months to supplement the experiment, which was not delayed and the pressure was great.After the repair, the trial will be passed and received.

(1) Thank | pub

The questions from the external audit experts were incisive and could not be avoided. Answering them was very difficult. It took 3 months to complete the supplementary experiments, and there was no room for delay, so the pressure was high. After making revisions, it was re-audited and accepted

(0) Thank | 一只珠玉呀

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The review speed is very fast, two weeks after submission, it was rejected with opinions from three reviewers

(0) Thank | Christine Housman

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: The latest published study on birth cohort, congenital heart research: The results of this study support and extend the findings of the early NBDPS, indicating a possible association between the use of antihypertensive medications and an increased risk of specific CHD, although we cannot completely rule out the confounding effects of potential disease characteristics

(0) Thank | Nicola Cooke

Definitely not yet to external review. HSH1234 2016-03-13: Just submitted for one day, and the status changed to under review. Received an email (have begun the assignment/peer review process). As it's my first submission, I'd like to ask if this status means it has been sent out for review or if it's an initial editorial review. Please advise, thank you

(0) Thank | Nicola Cooke

This issue should be dealt with rationally, and foreigners' programming thinking is very important. There are internal and external reviews, with technical review first and peer review later. The criteria examined at each level are different

(0) Thank | Nicola Cooke

One of the seven major flagship journals of the American Heart Association.The top mark journal in the field of cardiovascular research, the reviewers are all big cattle in the field, and the articles are more than the circulation research every year, but the review ratio is very low, so the impact factor is about 7 in recent years.There are few articles made in pure China, and research requires a combination of basic clinical methods, and model animals are often used.At the same time, research results need to be strongly innovative.The reviewer's question is sharp and unambiguous. It can be published in this journal. It has already explained the level of research and is a journal with great influence in the cardiovascular field.Articles charge a page fee, see the journal faster!The receiving ratio should be less than 10%.

(7) Thank | qiye

Hello, may I ask if this magazine charges for page fees?
Anonymous, July 18, 2014: Research interests: epidemiology; clinical research; acceptance rate: about 5%; review time: about 1 month. Submitted an article on June 25th, on clinical aspects, with a relatively large sample size. Received first review in 14 days, with 2 reviewers requested. The first reviewer highly praised our research, only suggesting that we find a native English speaker to polish the language. The second reviewer raised 5 minor issues, including language and some very small details. Spent 2500 yuan on language editing, carefully answering the reviewers' questions, and resubmitted after 1 week. 2 days later, it was rejected, stating that although the research was good and the reviewers had no objections, it did not meet the priority conditions for publication. I have replied asking why we were asked to revise if the research did not meet the conditions for publication. Could it be just for the so-called language editing fee? I suggest to comrades, don't be fooled again. In the future, regardless of the journal, language should be the final thing to be modified. Let the editor check everything else first. If everything is okay, only then consider the language issue. It's not a big deal if it's just a language issue. Chinese-written SCIs are often criticized by foreigners for language issues, and you know the reason – the profits of the language editing companies. Although it failed, there are lessons learned to be shared with comrades

(0) Thank | 金蛇怡君