Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1080-7039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1549-7860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 11.70% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/bher20/current | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/bher20/current | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC, 325 CHESTNUT ST, SUITE 800, PHILADELPHIA, USA, PA, 19106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Environmental Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1080-7039%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT: | Write a review |
Author: 琪琪科研狗 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-11-07 12:08:00 It is a very good journal. It took more than two months from submission to acceptance. One revision was made in the middle. There were two reviewers, whose comments were strict and meticulous. The impact factor has been rising year by year, and I hope it will rise to Q3 as soon as possible. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 南宫 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-08-26 21:05:54 At present, there is a backlog of manuscripts in this journal, and the time of publication is basically about one year. According to the journal, it claims that it has changed its publishing house. If you only want to make your article online, you can submit to it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Fei & Yin Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-08-06 14:44:02 It was fast from submission to acceptance, but it was too slow to be published. It has been a year, and the issue has not been scheduled, and the journal has too many articles backlogged. I don’t know what’s going on this year; it’s too slow to be published. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-23 13:20:00 Wonderful editor. Simply submitted and it was returned in a few months. The reviewer evaluated it as positive, and the editor gave a minor revision. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LSH001 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-18 15:00:44 I submitted my paper for the second time, and this time the fate is even more unpredictable than the first submission, and the reviewers are also stricter. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ..11 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-29 16:05:36 Is this journal open access? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 93秦先生 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-07 04:06:37 The review speed is acceptable, but it took a long time in the hands of the editor. Submitted on March 31st, it was with the managing editor on April 1st, and didn't move to "with editor" until April 23rd. Then it was stuck for almost a month, finally sent for review on May 19th. After only being reviewed for 11 days, it was marked as "decision pending," making it seem unlikely to be accepted. However, on June 1st, it was requested for major revisions, which were submitted on June 16th. It was then stuck in the editor's hands for another nine days, sent for review for another ten days, and finally accepted. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 人生要刘白 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-10-07 11:24:33 The chance of being selected is higher this time, it takes nearly a month to revise and upload the paper again. Please be patient, and I wish you good news! ![]() ![]() |
Author: lij_deng Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-18 20:05:30 There is a submission that has been under review for five months without a decision. On August 24th, it showed "Decision Pending" and there has been no further update since then. I followed up last week but did not receive a response. I am wondering if the editors of this journal are currently working. I noticed that there have been no new articles posted on the official website for the past 20 days. What are the chances of my article being accepted? It has been too long and the wait is becoming unbearable ![]() ![]() |
Author: 人生要刘白 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-13 07:51:16 Urbanization and ecological environment-related content, submitting articles is really mysterious, submitting to Land was directly rejected, submitting to Ecological Indicators two months later, the reviewer said there was insufficient innovation and was rejected. After transferring to this journal, the reviewer also raised the issue of innovation, gave many constructive suggestions, and the article was accepted after revisions. Submitted on May 15, 2023 Sent for review on June 12, 2023 (with editor for almost half a month) Revised on June 25, 2023 Revised on July 21, 2023 With editor on August 15, 2023 (no processing for almost a month, a bit anxious) Second review on August 20, 2023 Accepted on September 12, 2023 ![]() ![]() |
Author: lij_deng Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-06-08 10:24:02 Submitted in mid-April, three days after submission, asked to revise the format; On May 1st, the status changed to "with editor" and has been ongoing without being sent for review. Sent an email to the editor in chief in late May to inquire about the progress but did not receive a reply. It feels so slow, it seems like recently published articles take about six months to be accepted. Any fellow researchers currently submitting? Welcome to discuss. ![]() ![]() |
Author: CILY Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-05-08 20:40:38 May I ask what is the status of your manuscript submission now? Is this journal recommended for submission? Thank you for your response, miss. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一份鸭肠 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-12-09 10:26:10 May I ask about the progress? It has been over a week and it still hasn't reached the editor's hands. 555. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Qiang Sun Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-09-27 15:26:35 May I ask what is the status of your article? When did it change? Mine has been in the same state all along? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 拉拉啦啦 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-04-18 12:25:39 May I ask how long you have maintained this state? Are there any subsequent changes? Thank you very much! ![]() ![]() |
Author: tomatoxiao666 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-03-28 17:28:20 Does "online" mean the first release on the internet? ![]() ![]() |
Author: leech Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-03-15 09:12:09 I also voted for half a month and have been in this state all along. I don't know the final outcome of yours. ![]() ![]() |
Author: hbsyly Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-01-20 20:14:44 I submitted it on January 14th, and the status today is "With Editor". I would like to ask how this journal is. It had a rating of 2.3 last year, but this year it is 5.1. I was a bit hasty when I submitted it. Can any experienced person provide some guidance? ![]() ![]() |
Author: zibuyu~ Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-06 16:27:38 Submitted on November 3, 2021, I have been constantly in contact with the Journal Administrator. May I ask what the matter is? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 胡 Subject Area: Medicine Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-10-16 20:09:55 Submitted on October 1, 2021, until October 14th, it has been "With Journal Administrator" status. It is still in this status till now and has not even reached the "With Editor" status. What's going on? ![]() ![]() |
Author: AUSTLY Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-06-29 16:58:34 The latest prediction for the impact factor of this journal is 3.937. ![]() ![]() |
Author: titina Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-14 16:59:05 2.11 contribution3.16 Notification modification4.05 returned the revised draft6.01 notice second repair6.19 Return to the revised draft6.26 receivingFrom submission to reception, it lasts just 4.5 months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-26 17:36:00 has submited in a risk of heavy metal exposure.The two reviewers, the reviewer was very serious, and was quickly acceptd after the revision!In addition, the editorial attitude is also good, I plan to select again.The review period is about 2 months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-13 15:46:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/bher20/current ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-16 09:38:00 This journal has submitted two articles, one on environmental concentration testing, questionnaires and residents' health risks. The editor's opinion is that the results of the questionnaire are not credible. It is recommended to keep only the concentration.Detection.With the change. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |