Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1354-1013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1365-2486 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 7.60% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/gcb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Environmental Science | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 409 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1354-1013%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.3 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 37.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY: | Write a review |
Author: 中中中678 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-06-05 14:15:53 It took about two days for undergoing initial checking for my manuscript. And it then took one month for under review. There were two reviewers. The notice of major revision was given immediately after review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: garyhzy0418 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-06-03 16:20:38 Excuse me, how long will the status “undergoing initial checking” last after submission? My article has been submitted for more than ten days, and it is still this status. It is my first time to submit to GCB, and I don’t know what the status of each step is and how long will it last. Thank you! ![]() ![]() |
Author: 地学 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-13 04:23:10 There were three experts, their comments were professional, and hit the nail on the head. The experts gave unanimous affirmation due to the highly innovative topic selection which made up for domestic vacancy. It was accepted after major and minor revisions! The overall feeling is that the reviewers are strict, the experts are professional, the papers are highly innovative, and the papers with greater impact can have a try. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-12-25 05:36:52 The first submission was in June, and after four weeks, the overall comments of the three reviewers were positive. The editor gave a rejection and resubmit (two-month period). Revised, applied for a one-month extension; returned revisions in early October, received the results in early November. Only took 4 weeks. Reviewer 1 still has minor concerns, and reviewers 2 and 3 recommended acceptance. The newly added reviewer 4 gave some comments. Overall positive, and the return was made in mid-December and received directly after 5 days. Very good journal, quick review, strict editorial process, high peer recognition. Definitely a top journal and worth a try. Good luck! ![]() ![]() |
Author: forlinger Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-31 15:10:47 The editor gave a major revision. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 可口可乐1331 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-15 11:46:31 It has been almost a month, is everything still checking out okay? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Eldon_kh Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-13 23:54:58 Oh, this is clearly an editorial issue. Not a single reviewer rejected it, yet the editor did. It could have been spared from review, wasting the resources of reviewers and the time of the contributors. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小白龙 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-03-02 21:36:38 The status of my application submitted on February 13th is still the same until now. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Tembin Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-24 18:06:26 I have been in this state for over a week now, how about you, OP? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 艾森伯格 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-19 20:15:54 It has been a week, is everything normal? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 艾森伯格 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-16 00:27:17 May I ask about the outcome? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 艾森伯格 Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-16 00:08:00 May I ask how long does it usually take for the status of "Undergoing initial checking"? ![]() ![]() |
Author: SJNing Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-17 00:22:38 You are most likely being sent for review in your current state. ![]() ![]() |
Author: forlinger Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-12 23:31:13 Three days after submission, "Under Review" means it has been sent for review or the editor is evaluating it? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 梦想成为更好的自己 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-01-09 15:28:40 The submission process has been bumpy, here is a record: August 2, 2024: Submitted September 26, 2024: Revised and resubmitted, with two reviewers requiring additional validation results and some text reorganization November 20, 2024: Resubmitted, currently under review I have previously submitted to GCB with a trial mindset, but the results were not very good. This manuscript was submitted to several sub-journals before, but ended without any progress. The journey with GCB has also been difficult, hoping for a smooth process for the manuscript in the future. PS: GCB is still considered a "white moonlight" in my heart, being able to have one accepted can bring joy for a long time. ![]() ![]() |
Author: sunny- Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-20 16:25:29 Top journals in the field of environmental ecology, such as GCB and Ecology Letters, are focused on regional and global scale issues, emphasizing innovation and quality of work. The editors and reviewers are highly professional and provide constructive feedback. While there may be rejections and resubmissions, the handling of manuscripts is faster compared to other journals. Submitted on May 17, rejected and resubmitted on June 1, revised on August 13, major revisions on September 23, revised again on November 5, and finally accepted on November 7. The journal has a high reputation, and I hope to publish another article there in the future. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 林宇艾 Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-20 10:17:57 It needs to have global significance, be connected to major issues, have a large scale, but not be nitpicky about details, and be less rigorous than association journals. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ysalc Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-13 02:23:21 The flagship journal in the global change field should be the top tier among both the main journal and its sub-journals, with many articles coming from the sub-journals. I was fortunate to have an article accepted, and the process was very fast. The first review took a month and a half for major revisions, and the second review took three weeks before acceptance. It took just over two months from submission to acceptance. In my personal opinion, GCB places a strong emphasis on the novelty and interest of research. The research should have global significance, and they are not very picky about details. The best part is the speed - I have noticed that articles published online on their website are usually accepted within six months from submission, which is much better than journals like AFM. Overall, it is a very authoritative, high-level, and fast-paced journal. Articles with strong innovation and significant impact are worth a try. ![]() ![]() |
Author: GUNDAM Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-09 15:56:26 Submit on 2024.7.7 Try it out, not sure how it will turn out. ![]() ![]() |
Author: microeco Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-21 09:05:21 Two major revisions and one minor revision were rejected by the editor. ![]() ![]() |
Author: XAZZ Subject Area: Life Science学 Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-06 14:13:11 03-Jan-2024: Submission; 04-Mar-2024_16-Apr-2024: Resubmission; 28-May-2024: Minor revision; 05-June-2024: re-submission; 06-June-2024: Accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: microeco Subject Area: Environmental Sciences Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-05-10 08:25:51 5.7 Submitted 5.10 Under review Is it under review or with the editor? Hoping for a positive outcome ![]() ![]() |
Author: Dogontheleft Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-04-15 19:23:16 Submitted in November 23, received the result one month later. Got one major revision and one minor revision, then got rejected and asked to resubmit. Made revisions in March and got accepted in April. The editor's decision was one level below the reviewers' recommendations ![]() ![]() |
Author: grammays Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-04-05 08:32:55 Hello, is there an online proofreading stage at the end? ![]() ![]() |
Author: grammays Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-04-02 09:48:31 Thank you for your help with translating this paragraph ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page |