Review cycle was long (it may be difficult to find suitable reviewers). Reviewers were very serious and responsible, and greatly helped to improve the quality of the article. The specific review process is as follows for your reference: Submission: 2017-01-16; Major revision: 2017-09-17; Resubmit after major revision: 2017-10-24; Minor revision: 2017-12-03; Resubmit after minor revision: 2017-12-03; Accepted: 2017-12-15.

(2) Thank | 飞天小猪ljzhu

Received, 19 February 2020; Received in revised form, 20 June 2020; Accepted, 20 June 2020; Available online, 23 June 2020. The review was not only efficient, but the editor was also very responsible. It is a recommended journal. It was my first time to write the article submitted to SCI journal, and it was accepted, which was lucky.

(3) Thank | DFCM

The review speed has been accelerated, and the result of review was given in a month. 2019.10.25, submission; 2020.1.1, moderate revision; 2020.1.27, the revision submitted; 2020.2.26, accept (the editor was on holiday or in vacation, it was delayed); 2020.3.2, online. There were two reviewers; the requirements for format were high; requirements for the completeness of article presentation were high; the questions raised were also professional. I hope the journals gets better and better.

(4) Thank | ygtwrdx

Submitted on August 23, 2017; major revision on December 3, 2017; revision submitted on January 15, 2018; with editor January 15, 2018; with editor March 15, 2018; with editor April 15, 2018; Major revision on May 3, 2018; revision submitted on May 28, 2018; accepted on August 5, 2018. Took a lot of effort to get this published. During the process, I was so anxious and even thought of withdrawing the manuscript, but it was over now. Review takes a long time at this journal, mainly because of the large number of accumulated papers, and also because the editor is very responsible. The editor read every sentence carefully and gave a lot of comments.

(4) Thank | nimin

I am the same as you, I submitted the revision to WE on January 9, 2025, and now I am considering sending an email to inquire about it, but I am a little afraid to rush them (covers face).

(0) Thank | 什么时候发一区

I am just like you, I submitted the corrections on January 9, 2025, and now I am considering sending an email to inquire about it.

(0) Thank | 什么时候发一区

After giving a moderate revision on 1/22, there was a revision on 1/28. It has been almost 4 months and there has been no action taken. What is the situation?

(0) Thank | Larca

Excuse me, does this journal not have track links?

(0) Thank | 郑子铭

How's the speed of your reviewers in reviewing?

(0) Thank | 额可赛普特

2024.10.25 Submit
2024.12.9 Under review (5)
2024.12.16 Required reviews complete (2)

(0) Thank | 额可赛普特

The four reviewers I assigned are about to cry.

(0) Thank | 凉皮僧666

How many external auditors do you have on your side?

(0) Thank | 凉皮僧666

I am also curious if we have invited any "reviewers".

(0) Thank | Hoood

Guessing blindly, three districts will be lost this year.

(0) Thank | Hoood

The main point of criticism is actually the editor's sloppy and lazy work, which is a key reason hindering the publication of papers. If you don't want to work, you can resign. There are plenty of people willing to do the job.

(0) Thank | Hoood

Don't worry too much, just be patient and wait. The quality of the article in this journal is still good, so prepare well for the next one! Keep it up!

(1) Thank | 破碎的雨音

This might be the editor reviewing it themselves and feeling that it's not good enough, so they rejected it. I submitted to a certain district 6-point journal this year, and the same thing happened. The review took two months and then it was rejected. The feedback was that the editor reviewed it themselves and the rejection was based solely on their own review, without any specific content.

(0) Thank | 破碎的雨音

Is the final review invitation sent to the reviewers or not?

(0) Thank | Ge Duo

2024.7.9 Submission
2024.9.9 External review
2024.10.20 Invitation to reviewers
Is it a bit too slow?

(0) Thank | Ge Duo

There is a reason why the impact factor of this journal keeps hitting new lows. The editors hardly intervene and rarely send submissions for review. After over a month under review, the manuscript was rejected based on a template without any reviewer comments.

(0) Thank | Hoood

2024.1.27 Submission
2024.2.2 External audit
2024.3.20 Completion of the first external audit review
2024.5.16 Completion of the second external audit review, rrc status

(0) Thank | wo123

Usually it's two digits, no matter how many times you try, it's always two digits

(0) Thank | 不懂

Hello, how many referees have accepted the comments? I'm ten days late, and I'm still in RRC

(0) Thank | Lpl57524

Submitted on November 30, 23.
Reviewed on January 20, 24.
RRC on April 1, 24

(0) Thank | Lpl57524

2023-11-20: submitted
2023-11-24: with editor
2023-11-25: under review
2023-12-24: Major
2024-2-7: resubmitted
2024-2-8: with editor
2024-2-22: completed - accept

(0) Thank | 不懂