Old-brand journal. The article quality is OK, and the development trend good. The article is about transcriptome sequencing, some phenotypes constructed from materials and verification data have also been added. Sequencing alone will definitely not enough. Manuscript review was fast and professional, which took about one month, and it was directly been accepted after minor revisions.

(4) Thank | 柯

I thought that it could still be very smooth as long as the content meets the journal’s requirements. The manuscript had been under reviewing for 1 month and then it was required to be revised. And it was accepted soon after the revision according to the reviewer comments. The language requirements were not particularly harsh. It is recommended for those graduates who are in hurry. Good luck to everyone.

(2) Thank | jean_valjean

Agood journal, 2016-2017 latest impact factor 2.415. I published some time ago “ECSM2, an endothelial specific VE-cadherin binding protein, has a tyrosine phosphorylation site essential to cell migration.” It is now online, and here’s my experience: Received 1 December 2017, Revised 21 March 2018, Accepted 9 April 2018, Available online 10 April 2018. To be honest, the reviewers of the article determine how fast your paper is published. It is best for you to suggest reviewers relevant and familiar with the field for reviewing the manuscript when submitting it. This is very important. This is my own experience.

(0) Thank | huiyao197662@163.com

Submitted on January 23, 2025, and suggested to transfer to a subsidiary magazine on April 11, 2025. Two reviewers were invited, and their opinions were fair, but it was rejected. I don't understand, none of the subsidiary magazines are SCI, so I decisively switched to another magazine to submit, wasting time!

(0) Thank | Germuse

Review article, overall experience was great, the review process was very fast. Submitted on January 26th, invited 2++ reviewers, received revision comments on February 26th from a total of three reviewers. Given 3 weeks to make revisions, with over 30 questions in total. Carefully addressing each question significantly improved the quality of the article. Revised on March 5th, all reviewers replied with positive feedback on March 12th, and all three reviewers agreed to accept the article. Today, we happily received the acceptance notification.

(0) Thank | 丽丽cherish

I submitted the article in May 24th, after 3 revisions in November, the editor said the article was going to be accepted. However, in February, I was informed that the previous editor had left, and the new editor disagreed with publishing it... It's really ridiculous.

(0) Thank | cristianoW

Submitted on November 13th, revised on December 25th, accepted on January 7th. It was a quick process, less than 2 months.

(0) Thank | ssagw

Does the magazine have to be related to genetics? Can it be about general tumor mechanisms?

(0) Thank | .W.W.

The review process takes 2 days after being sent to the editor.

(0) Thank | 上岸在即

I transferred to GENE and will accept manuscript reviews within 10 days after being invited as a reviewer.

(0) Thank | 上岸在即

Submitted on July 26, major revisions on October 2, minor revisions on November 27, rejected on December 10. During the minor revisions, it was mentioned that my article should be acceptable, but it was still rejected. The reviewers all gave positive feedback.. I am speechless.. They said my topic is not relevant enough to genetics.

(0) Thank | chichichcihic

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for your article to be reviewed?

(0) Thank | 幸运

Hello, may I ask if there have been any updates on your article? Mine is also currently with the editor.

(0) Thank | 幸运

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 3

"我昨天去了动物园，看到了很多可爱的动物，比如大熊猫、长颈鹿和斑马。我最喜欢的动物是袋鼠，它们跳得非常高非常远，看起来非常有趣。我还喂了一些小动物，它们非常可爱，我玩得非常开心。"

(0) Thank | 云来雅晗

Are you trying to manipulate peer review?

(0) Thank | 云来雅晗

The reviewing process has been a bit convoluted, as each time revisions were made, a different reviewer was assigned.

(0) Thank | 上岸在即

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The official website clearly does not accept 1. pure bioinformatics 2. Mendel randomization 3. a case report. A junior fellow of mine submitted a pure bioinformatics article and was instantly rejected. A female scientist in France who won the Nobel Prize for inventing gene editing technology, and a Nobel Prize-winning scientist in Japan, have both published articles in Gene. The official website shows an acceptance rate of 15%, and the review process is quite strict, but very serious. I have had three reviewers, and one of them asked me to change all bar graphs to scatter plots for data evaluation. The downside is that the impact factor is not high, but it has been stable and not classified as a risk category.

(0) Thank | 云来雅晗

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submitted in 2024.4, first decision in 2024.7, with 2 reviewers, major revision in 2024.8.2, sent back for revision, invited new reviewers in 2024.9, major revision in 2024.9.17, sent back for revision, minor revision in 2024.10, sent back for revision on 2024.10.17, accepted on 10.23.

(0) Thank | 云来雅晗

There is no page fee for this publication, it is optional. I chose to subscribe when I submitted my paper.

(0) Thank | 2601960247

I am too, super slow.

(0) Thank | 璃月世敏

Wow, has it been this long?

(0) Thank | 蒙德初真

Patience is a virtue, victory is just within reach.

(0) Thank | Adelaide Lawson

2024/06/26 Submission
2024/08/09 Major revision (3 reviewers invited, 22 questions; editor, 5 questions)
2024/09/10 R1 submission
2024/09/24 Minor revision (2 reviewers invited, 0 question; editor, 3 questions)
2024/10/04 R2 submission
2024/10/08 Accepted
2024/10/09 Proof
2024/10/10 In press

(0) Thank | 一只胖橘猫

Still under review... I want to withdraw the submission.
Are you a minor revision?

(0) Thank | Julia

I am also waiting for the third one. I submitted the manuscript in February, and it underwent a major revision once. Now I am still waiting for the third reviewer. It's really frustrating...

(0) Thank | Julia