The review speed is still relatively fast, and there will be results in 3 months. Hope the journal gets better and better!

(3) Thank | paper boy

The opinions were very pertinent. The revision opinions were received two and a half months after the first review. It was accepted one month after submitting the revised manuscript.

(0) Thank | TingtingGaoXing

Submitted for the Safe area of IoT. A few days to four months, the first review came back, and one month later after the second review with major revisions, I received the notification email of Sent to Production. The review comments are very pertinent and critical, and it was accepted after our careful revisions. They’re quite efficient.

(4) Thank | amosx

I submitted a paper related to applied cryptography. I received the first review of that paper within three months. It was a major revision. After that, I received two minor revisions. To get the first minor revision, I waited another 2-3 month. Overall my experience was good.

(0) Thank | nazatul@iiitg.ac.in

2024-10-17 With editor
2024-10-19 Under review
2024-11-23 Major revision
2024-12-26 Resubmit
2025-5-13 Minor revision
2025-5-14 Resubmit
2025-5-18 Accept

(0) Thank | sheeperyang

I am the same, my rrc status has been over 30 days and there has been no change.

(0) Thank | 仅仅

It has been nearly seven months, either the reviewers accepted but did not review or the new reviewers did not accept the invitation, please review it as soon as possible.

(0) Thank | accept！！！！！

More than two months have passed without any results. The submission deadline is February 25, 2025, and the last update on April 09, 2025, states that Required Reviews have been completed. There have been no changes in the current status for the past month.

(0) Thank | GHRABI

May I ask what the requirements are and where can I find them?

(0) Thank | suibianqide

It should be visible to all.

(0) Thank | 知北游

Hello everyone, I would like to ask, after the first author fills out all the information and invites the corresponding author to confirm, can the first author not see anything on the page, can't see the progress, but the corresponding author can see it, is that correct?

(0) Thank | Lattice

I am using the official universal two-column LaTex template provided by Elsevier.

(0) Thank | alice_lcw

The first review was fast, the second review took 2-3 months (one of the reviewers disappeared and we had to invite another one), and now it's been two months for the third review. Currently, only one reviewer has submitted their comments, while the other two reviewers have not responded (suspected to have disappeared again).

(0) Thank | alice_lcw

It is best to confirm everything, there seems to be someone downstairs who may be a co-author who has not been confirmed, and has been there for 4 months.

(0) Thank | 知北游

Do all authors need to confirm in the system after submitting a manuscript to this journal?

(0) Thank | goodlucky

Do all authors need to confirm in the system after submitting a manuscript to this journal?

(0) Thank | goodlucky

2025.04.01 submit
2025.04.02 with editor
2025.04.16 with editor
It's been half a month and still haven't found a reviewer, it's too slow.

(0) Thank | 中啊@

The author's confirmation is sufficient. If there is an ORCID, please include it, but it is not necessary.

(0) Thank | 小苦瓜

Do you need the ORCID of all authors or just their confirmation?

(0) Thank | Accepted(xyer)

Hello, do you need the ORCID of all authors? Or just confirmation is enough?

(0) Thank | Accepted(xyer)

Hello, do you need the ORCID of all authors?

(0) Thank | Accepted(xyer)

How long will it take for you to complete the required reviews before there is any news, as mine is also about 39 days old.

(0) Thank | GHRABI

It has been over five months since the first trial and still no news.

(0) Thank | accept！！！！！

2024/9/18 Submitted to Journal
2024/9/19 With Editor
2024/9/27 Under Review
2024/10/20 Required Reviews Completed
2024/11/1 Decision in Process
2024/11/3 Major Revision
2024/12/29 With Editor
2025/1/9 Under Review
2025/2/3 Required Reviews Completed
2025/2/4 Decision in Process
2025/2/7 Major Revision
2025/2/15 With Editor
2025/3/5 Under Review
2025/3/19 Required Reviews Completed
2025/3/24 Decision in Process
2025/3/29 Accept
The quality of reviewers is excellent, the feedback provided is very constructive, and the editorial processing speed is also very fast. Congratulations to FGCS for continuously improving!

(0) Thank | 小苦瓜

Bro, if you want to know which division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences your friend is in, you should check the division table of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. There is only one intermediary here.

(0) Thank | 知北游