I was under review the next day, and then received revision comments two weeks later without noticing if there was a step with the editor. Your under review should be in the peer review process. Good luck!

(0) Thank | 科研人

I just submitted it yesterday, and 10 minutes later it changed to "Under review". Does this mean it is being reviewed, or is it just a normal status?

(0) Thank | 快乐风

Hello, may I ask if it is normal for a submission to show "under review" on the second day? Is there no "with editor" process for this journal?

(0) Thank | 快乐风

The first submission to angew resulted in tragedy after review. It is suggested to resubmit to advanced science or small. If rejection continues, consider submitting to aggregate, where feedback is received within two weeks. After making revisions for over twenty days, the revised manuscript was accepted just two or three days later. The whole process took about a month, with efficient editors. Good luck to aggregate for continued success!

(0) Thank | 科研人

There are no emails for submission, you can see them in the system, and every author can see them. Only the corresponding authors of Weily's other journals can see them.

(0) Thank | Jamie0703

Is there a notification for submission?

(0) Thank | xuwz

Instant IF=14.4 The impact factor may plummet next year

(0) Thank | Taqiangrentaqiang

The review process takes about a month, and the editor is very good. The acceptance comes a little over a week after minor revisions

(0) Thank | 哈哈哈哈哦

Review process takes one month, and accepted after minor revisions in two weeks. The speed is impressive.
Initially wanted to submit to well-known journals like AFM or ACS Nano. The article has highlights and data, and the mentor also thinks the chances are good. However, eventually chose this journal seeing other big research groups submitting to it. Also optimistic about the future development of this journal

(2) Thank | lucissu

Submitted to AM, rejected after revisions, rejected the resubmission to AM, turned to Aggregate themselves
Submitted on 2-11
Received first round of comments on 3-14, from three reviewers, should be minor revisions
Resubmitted on 3-17
Accepted on 3-25
Just because I submitted to this journal doesn't mean it's great, it's just a choice. Given the opportunity, I would still choose AM. Never expected to be rejected even after revisions. But reality is, choosing Aggregate is also my choice. I hope this journal can maintain its impact factor with everyone's efforts, aiming for 20+. Maintaining the impact factor will naturally attract high-quality submissions, creating a positive development cycle

(1) Thank | Jamie0703

Submitted to Angew for review

(0) Thank | Once Young

Domestic top journals seem to target Nature and Science

(1) Thank | 科研小白Tsu

Do smaller research groups not have to go through the review process?

(0) Thank | Lianping

The majority of them are from the top research group, with most of the papers being review articles

(0) Thank | WilliamTsu

Before you submit an aggregate, may I ask what article you submitted before and what level is the positioning of this article at the moment?

(1) Thank | Mitchell_Chen

Direct district one

(0) Thank | yemeng

May I ask if your "under review" is capitalized or not? Mine has always been "Under Review." If it should be in lowercase, approximately how long does it take to change to lowercase? Thank you

(0) Thank | lala999

Is this magazine good? I think it's in the four districts of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

(1) Thank | rebornwj

The editing efficiency is very high, and the submission received peer review comments in just half a month. There were three reviewers, and minor revisions were required. After one week, the revised manuscript was returned, and it was accepted directly after another week.

(1) Thank | mad world

I took a quick look at the aggregate public account. Most of the articles published on it are written by famous authors, and there are also a large number of reviews. I still have high hopes for this journal. It has been under review for over half a month now.
It was returned for revision on June 3rd, and the two reviewers had a positive attitude. The editor gave minor revisions.
It was accepted on June 17th. I wish aggregate will continue to improve. The whole process took about a month, which is quite fast.

(1) Thank | Xianpeng

This magazine is not open for just anyone to contribute.

(0) Thank | SDGGH8866

Rejected after submitting a minor revision, I resubmitted and was rejected again. One reviewer said the work was not suitable for such a high-level journal. I made a major revision and a minor revision, but it was still rejected with the same reason that it was not suitable for such a high-level journal. Confused...

(3) Thank | 姒昃