Submitted on September 22nd, it has just entered the review stage. I heard that the review process is very slow, so I recommend not submitting if it is urgent

(0) Thank | 水月白梦

Research focus: Anesthesia experience sharing: It has been a week, and the submission is still pending. I feel dizzy

(0) Thank | Martina Jeremy

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 晨风智敏

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: It has been a week and I still haven't been assigned a manuscript number. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | 虚徒丰雅

Research focus: Pain; Anesthesia experience sharing: 
Submitted the article for one week, the editor showed interest in the content, but suggested to resubmit it in the form of correspondence. In the end, it was accepted for publication

(0) Thank | 艾尔莎诺顿

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Authors need to objectively evaluate whether the quality of their research work matches the level of the selected journal. Top journals have high requirements for the originality of manuscripts. The acceptance rate of top journals such as Nature is less than 10%, and most manuscripts are rejected at the stage of the handling editor

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Can I submit directly to top journals like Nature/Science? Will they provide feedback?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

How many alternative journals should be generally selected for each journal level?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

How long did it take for you to review the manuscript later?

(0) Thank | 雨巷少年晨辉

Is the external review status under review? It has been over a month for this status

(0) Thank | 是你的承允呀

**
Review Speed: 6.0 Experience Sharing: The review process is very time consuming, and after six months of external review, the paper was rejected. Be cautious when submitting.

**

(0) Thank | 长安文阁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Just got rejected today, so I'll share some experience to accumulate good karma. The first submission didn't follow the scheduling requirements of the journal, so it was rejected. I revised it and resubmitted, and received feedback from external reviewers after over 3 months. The feedback was quite positive, so I spent a month carefully revising and adding data analysis. The second round of review took 20 days, and it was rejected again. It seems that I didn't meet the statistical requirements, possibly due to my inaccurate explanation. Sigh, I hope to get accepted soon, please wish me luck

(0) Thank | 璃沙忆青

Seeking experience, seeking to share

(0) Thank | Oliver Jerry

Does this magazine require a layout fee? Thank you

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This journal is now rated at 2.5, which is a significant increase from last year. Is there hope that it can go up further? To a 3?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Journal Homepage URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=EJA

(0) Thank | Anonymous