The review results are available in 1 month, which is very fast. It was online in 2 months. One major revision, two minor revisions, and one rejection were received, and finally a major revision was required. The revision was resubmitted after 7 days, and it got accepted directly after 3 days. The efficiency is really high. I am very optimistic about this journal.

(4) Thank | lone

An article of mine has just got accepted recently, and the specific process is as follows: Submitted on December 22, 2019, and major revision made on February 8, 2020. One reviewer gave a lot of comments, another one basically had no comment. Revision submitted on February 12, 2020. Accepted on February 15, 2020. I don’t know when it will be published. Is there anyone knows?

(4) Thank | 千与千寻123

December 2018, submission; February 2019, first review comments---major revisions required. (Under review 2 times during this period. We didn’t know if the reviewer were changes.) April 2019, revision submitted. (It took 2 months to make a lot of revisions.) May 2019, second review comments---minor revisions required. May 2019, accepted. The overall speed is still very fast.

(2) Thank | 玩的就是蛋

This journal is legendary, but my first review length was three and a half months, and the total to acceptance is 7 months. It doesn't feel very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

May I ask about the current status of your pre-print article?

(0) Thank | 雨辰

Family members, who knows, it's been almost two months since the return for repair and still no news.

(0) Thank | 我喜欢开挂

I submitted the manuscript on August 5th, received peer review on August 6th, and feedback on September 24th. I was asked for major revisions and additional experiments, with a deadline of 14 days. However, due to time constraints, I requested a 14-day extension from the editor. I submitted the revised manuscript on October 15th, but I have not received a decision yet. As of now, I can see that three reviewers have been invited (presumably the same three as before), two have accepted the invitation, and one reviewer has already provided feedback. I hope it will be accepted.

(0) Thank | 我喜欢开挂

It has been several days, is it going to get cold soon?

(0) Thank | 我想毕业球球了

Excuse me, how long have you been? I have been for several days and I am worried.

(0) Thank | 我想毕业球球了

How about it, did they receive it? It's been six or seven days and I haven't heard anything about my article being revised.

(0) Thank | 我喜欢开挂

How long does it usually take for the results of rework to come out? It has been half a month already, and I see that others are getting results in just five or six days.

(0) Thank | wyyywywyyy

Excuse me, if I accidentally selected preprint when submitting my paper, what should I do? Can I send an email to the editor of European Food Research and Technology to withdraw the preprint?

(0) Thank | 张12

Under review for two days, rejected in a week, not satisfied with the outcome. On the bright side, at least it feels good to have someone take away my trash.

(0) Thank | 让我中吧啊啊啊

Submission deadline is December 23rd, notification of acceptance will be sent by the end of February, and proofs will be sent one month later. Quite fast

(0) Thank | stephanieho

The review process was quick, with an EIC decision appearing in less than a month, but it was soon placed under review again. It seems like the chances are slim

(0) Thank | fake

Hello, why is my submission in an "unassigned" status instead of "under review"?

(0) Thank | Jinji_Lau

Hello, may I ask how long it usually takes to receive feedback after submitting a contribution? Do you have an idea of the approximate time? Can contributions generally be accepted within three to four months?

(0) Thank | Jinji_Lau

Hello, may I ask how long it usually takes for feedback after submission? Do you know the approximate timeframe? Can a manuscript be accepted within four months?

(0) Thank | Jinji_Lau

22-Jul-2022 Submission, 15-Sep-2022 Major revision, 12-Nov-2022 Acceptance. This journal puts manuscripts "under review" as soon as they are submitted, followed by a period of time with the Editor-in-Chief (EIC), and then continues with the "under review" process. The reviewers' comments were very good, and the review process was relatively short. After the major revision, I didn't feel like making any more changes, so it took a long time. Still, I highly recommend this journal, as they accepted it a few days after the revisions were made. I feel that this journal has good prospects, as long as it goes through the review process. Unfortunately, one of my junior colleagues had their manuscript rejected because they didn't submit it. My manuscript number is 1000, and they publish around 300 articles a year, with a one-third chance of acceptance. I hope to have the opportunity to be published in a higher-tier journal in the future.

(0) Thank | 科研小陈努力

Hello, would it be convenient to add you as a friend and consult about the submission questions of this journal?

(0) Thank | lhazrael

After repair, it was quickly submitted on the 13th and received on the 15th.

(1) Thank | Hehe@he

Has anyone submitted a summary? How is the situation?

(0) Thank | wgylllu

Under review means that it is being reviewed, is that correct? Upstairs.

(1) Thank | Paper will be accepted

The review process took about one and a half months. It was first under review for a month, with the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) taking about a week or so. After that, it remained under review for over half a month before receiving the revision request. I took about a month to revise and resubmit, and I returned it in about a week. Soon after, it was accepted for publication. Overall, it was relatively fast.

(0) Thank | 写的都是什么鬼

Under Review means that it is being reviewed. When written with a capital R, it refers to the reviewers. When written with a lowercase r, it refers to the editorial department.

(0) Thank | 浩然伯爵