This submission experience is quite good. The editors and reviewers are also responsible. Good option for fast publication of moderate tier work.

(0) Thank | Cavatina

Select the issues you want to delve into for in-depth discussion; discuss the selected issues from multiple perspectives in a certain order, reasoning must be based, the issues must be clearly explained and thoroughly discussed

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Highlight the innovativeness of your research, demonstrate prominent features that differentiate it from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue, what matters is having a distinction. As long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovative

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to highlight the innovation of an article in a discussion?

(0) Thank | 上清雨真

What is meant by in-depth discussion/ How can we deepen the depth of discussion?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The submission experience this time was quite good. The editors and reviewers were very responsible and nice. I received major revision comments within a month, and then went through a minor revision before acceptance. If your work is good but not outstanding, you can consider submitting to this journal. No page charges are required and the process is fast

(0) Thank | 稻妻古韵

The quality of articles in recent years has been a bit low, it is a bit of a shame compared to the articles from previous years for this journal

(0) Thank | 无妄玉惠

The quality of articles in recent years is a bit low, or the articles in previous years are better, it is a pity that this journal

(0) Thank | Barsabas

It's a bit bleak, can't even keep this 1.5 points, how can I go on?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁