2020.4.30, submitted; 2020.7.21, the comments were returned, and major revision was required; 2020.9.18, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.10.8, accepted. I feel it is pretty easy, and the editor-in-chief was nice. Due to the pursuing for doctor degree after the master period, I urged it once during the period. Unexpectedly, it was accepted on the next day. The review speed is a bit slow, so don’t submit it if you are in a hurry.

(0) Thank | sch401

Nine months since I first submitted in May 2016. Still waiting. I hope I can get a final result back in three months, by this April. Fingers crossed.

(2) Thank | DAAT

How are things going now?

(0) Thank | zzj_researcher

Dear friends, may I ask where I can check the review status of this journal? I'm not sure how many reviewers have been invited, and I'm feeling unsure.

(0) Thank | 易半柳

May I ask how long it took for your status to change? I just submitted mine and it went straight to Under Review.

(0) Thank | 论文多多投稿必中（祈求版）

I would like to ask, does "under review" after submission of the manuscript mean it is under peer review?
After submitting my article, it displayed "submission," and then quickly changed to "under review." I am not sure if it is still with the editor or under peer review

(0) Thank | Louisyyl

First submission: March 1, 2023
Current Status: Submit to Journal
Current Status: Under Review - March 5, 2023
Current Status: Major revise - June 17, 2023
Current Status: Under Review - July 5, 2023
Accept: September 5, 2023
Overall it is quite slow, this paper is the experimental part of the senior brother’s paper in the first year of enrollment, and then I did some numerical simulations by myself, but there is not much innovation in reality. Many journals were rejected in the summer of 2021, and it is quite good to finally be accepted by this journal. Now there are several top journals, this paper is just used to make up the number of papers, which is quite good!

(2) Thank | 夜枫之舞

It has been 40 days already, and it has been like this all along. I want to consult and ask, how long does this condition usually last? It's driving me crazy.

(0) Thank | 期待晴天

Nabiha Brahmi
Sihem Saidani

(0) Thank | Khemirin@yahoo.fr

2016August contributionReceived review comments in February 2017Received in March 2017It is now November 2017 and has not been published...

(5) Thank | jizehua2010@163.com

was submitted in early February, and the rejection was rejected at the beginning of September. The reason is that the language is not good.No other comments were given.Waiting for 7 months to wait for a bad language evaluation is really a bit speechless.

(6) Thank | Anonymous

This journal has a serious manuscript accumulation, which can't be dealt with at all, and the editing process is very slow, so I won't select in the future.The drafts submitted in September-September are still evaluating opinions, almost one year.On average, I don’t know how to calculate it for two months, and I’m pulling it into the blacklist.

(18) Thank | 高原雨

reviewing the slowIn the editor, the delay is too long, and the overhaul is twice.In the 15th year of the 11th, the draft was submitted for more than one month, and after 4 months, I went back to the overhaul.The results of the overhaul were submitted in mid-May, and returned to the minor repairs in early August. They were accepted only on October 16 for a full 11 months.There is no movement after receiving it now.

(0) Thank | chenpei9009@126.com

Review period is long: Submitted at the end of August last year, the first trial ended in mid-to-late March this year, two reviewers, one minor repair, one overhaul - editor-in-chief to overhaul; upload revised draft one week laterIn the middle of the second trial, there was a bit of twists and turns (maybe the third reviewer), and in mid-May, I received a notification - Accepted! Anyway, it's a good thing!Still very grateful to EE: Abraham, MartinADM: Challa, Geetha!good luck!

(0) Thank | hpuabing

Review period: Submitted at the end of August last year, the first trial ended in mid-March this year, twoReviewer, a minor repair, a major overhaul - editor-in-chief to overhaul; uploading a revised draft a week later, a bit of a twist in the middle of the second trial (possibly looking for a third reviewer), received a notice in mid-May - Accepted! Anyway,Good things and more!Still very grateful to EE: Abraham, MartinADM: Challa, Geetha!good luck!

(0) Thank | 769577490@qq.com

On July 6th, there was news on December 6th, the first trial agreed to publish, the second trial had some opinions, and the final editor refused to comment, feeling that it was not a very responsible journal.

(0) Thank | aljnel@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

3 months in the first trial, the review speed is relatively fast, but the time in the editor is relatively long. If this time is shortened, the result will be basically within one and a half months.My work is still smooth, minor repairs in the first instance, repaired after 7 days, no external trial, directly received.

(2) Thank | 高飞

The review period of the journal is very long, and all have already selectd 4Months, the status is still Assigning Editor

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed can be, generally one month or so in the first trial, but the editor is very inky, minor repairs after minor repairs, returning for a week, no news.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7450

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Review speed is OK,The difficulty is not high, the publication period is relatively long

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2011 IF=1.649, the result is 2 months, 15 days after the minor repair!

(0) Thank | Anonymous