During the epidemic period, it took 4 months, and the revision in the middle was delayed for more than a month: 05/Mar/2020 With Editor; 06/Mar/ 2020 Under Review; 27/Mar/2020 Under Review; 29/Mar/2020 Ready for Decision; 03/Apr/2020 Ready for Decision; 04/Apr/2020 Under Revision; 31/May/2020 With Editor; 02/Jun/2020 Under Review; 16/Jun/2020 Ready for Decision; 19/Jun /2020 Under Review; 24/Jun/2020 Under Revision; 30/Jun/2020 With Editor; 01 Jul 2020 Accepted; 01 Jul 2020 Sent to Production.

(3) Thank | 地化小子

2019-11-18 initial submitted; 2019-11-19 send back to author (Because of the issue that how many digits should be reserved in the number of the table it was returned by the editor, and it is recommended to use valid numbers); 2019-11-19–2019-12-04 review invited (Although the list of recommended reviewers was submitted, it was still difficult to find reviewers, so it took a lot of time for the editor to find reviewers); 2020-01-21 major revision [The two reviewers had 23 questions (10/13) in total, which were not difficult to answer. But during the epidemic period I was at home, and I was in a hurry to write my thesis at the same time, So I started to revise the manuscript on February 22, 2020. On March 9 the first revision and response letter were sent to my supervisor and some suggestions were given. Later, under the guidance of the supervisor, the revision was made twice. On 19th duplication was checked and I revised again. Finally, it was submitted 2 days before the deadline.] 2020-03-20 revised submitted; 2020-04-03 accept (it was sent to the reviewer the next day after submission, and the reviewer was very fast this time). I feel that both the editor-in-chief and the deputy editor-in-chief are very responsible.

(3) Thank | yyfx

Very good editor, very efficient. Requires substantial data and good discussion.

(13) Thank | Tony

On the 30th, the reviewer completed the review in 10 days and it feels like it's going to be rejected.
On July 1st, another reviewer was pulled in.

(0) Thank | 赖皮的小白

Brother, how do I contact the editor? It has been two months since the external review and we can't find a second reviewer.

(0) Thank | 弱小无助

Submitted on the 17th
Reviewed by the editor on the 20th
Submitted with the idea of giving it a try, and the editor surprisingly reviewed it so quickly.

(0) Thank | 赖皮的小白

6.4 Rework
6.15 Accept

(0) Thank | WOO YX

The review process was very fast.

Submitted on July 5th
Revised on July 27th with 25 comments for changes
Re-submitted after changes on August 15th
Revised again on August 28th, one reviewer had negative comments while the other suggested acceptance
Re-submitted after changes on September 6th, successfully accepted
Published within a week.

(0) Thank | 梦想发表nc

Record
4.9 Submission
5.14 Revision with two reviewers Major Revision

(0) Thank | WOO YX

5.13 Accepted

Please translate the above paragraph into English.

(0) Thank | whywhywhy11111

Record
Submitted on 3.26
Reviewed externally on 3.28
Returned on 4.18 for major revisions on 5 pages with a total of 43 comments
Revised on 5.4
Returned on 5.11 for minor revisions

(0) Thank | whywhywhy11111

Please translate the following paragraph into English:
Record
0423WE
0503DIP
0507R-Transfer

(0) Thank | LEE SONG

Record, submission by 4.30

(0) Thank | chris mib

0423WE
0503DIP

(0) Thank | LEE SONG

Please submit your contribution by 0423.

(0) Thank | 林奈L

The first review had two reviewers with mostly positive comments, suggesting major revisions. After revising as requested, a new reviewer in the second round completely rejected the manuscript, causing the editor to reject it, wasting six months of time.

(0) Thank | 银河系超新星

The editor-in-chief has been transferred.

(0) Thank | ccw521

Oh, when submitting the article it was top, but after the revision it's no longer destiny.

(0) Thank | zzzzz11122

EP, Zone 2, has now become a non-top journal?? This old and well-respected journal in the industry has a high level of recognition, what's going on?

(2) Thank | 枫下拉莫

3.17 提交给期刊
3.18 由编辑处理

(0) Thank | supermanxqt

How are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 海绵宝宝0123

It's been almost a month and it's still in the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | 溪*

It's too slow, it's been four months since submission, three months of review, and initially only one person accepted the review. Later, a second reviewer could not be found. After writing a letter to urge, new reviewers were found, and currently four people have accepted the review, but the review has not been completed yet.

(0) Thank | 银河系超新星

Submitted for a month now, it's still in the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | 投稿人啊

Hello, may I ask what is the current status of your paper? I have been with the editor for 11 days now, but still haven't heard anything.

(0) Thank | Cherry_Huang